27 Dresses
Posted on January 17, 2008 at 7:40 am
BLowest Recommended Age: | High School |
MPAA Rating: | Rated PG-13 for language, some innuendo and sexuality. |
Profanity: | Some strong language (s-word, b-word) |
Alcohol/ Drugs: | Drinking (as liberating and empowering), characters get tipsy |
Violence/ Scariness: | Comic violence including slaps |
Diversity Issues: | None |
Date Released to Theaters: | January 18, 2007 |
Jane has a special closet in her apartment filled with 27 dresses so ugly that only two things can be true: (1) they were all bridesmaid’s dresses, and that means (2) all 27 brides assured her that they could be shortened and worn again.
Jane (Katherine Heigl of “Grey’s Anatomy” and “Knocked Up”) is a natural caretaker. After her mother died when she was a child, she took care of her sister. She has taken care of 27 different brides, helping out with wedding details that have her over-stuffed day-planner bristling with yellow sticky reminders. In her job, she takes care of her boss, George (Edward Burns), the too-good-to-be-true mountain-climbing CEO of an impeccably politically correct corporation. She makes sure he gets his breakfast burrito and picks up his dry cleaning. In her few spare moments, she sighs with love for George or sighs with hope over the weekly write-ups of the most romantic weddings in the Sunday paper. Her dreams are of white dresses, tossed bouquets, and big cakes with lots of icing. Her reality is…dreams.
Just as she decides to let George know how she feels, urged on by her best friend Casey (the marvelous Judy Greer, wasted in an underwritten role as the movie’s designated sleep-around friend), Jane’s globe-trotting model sister Tess (Malin Akerman) arrives and she and George immediately decide to get married, with guess who taking care of all the cake, flower, and decoration details. All of this is so distracting that Jane barely has time to notice the killer smile of Kevin, a cynical reporter (the marvelous James Marsden, almost-wasted in an under-written role that seems left over from an old Clark Gable character). For no reason except the demands of the increasingly flimsy plot, Kevin is required to keep a couple of obvious secrets.
Heigl is the real deal, with girl-you-wish-lived-next-door imperishable but accessible beauty, appealing, endearing, vulnerable, with understated comic timing. Marsden, too, has charm to spare. Both hold our interest and keep us rooting for them even when the script does its best to get in the way. Do we really need yet another scene with characters letting go by getting tipsy and singing 80’s songs? Akerman (“The Heartbreak Kid”), in her second role in five months as a selfish, irresponsible, and all-around nightmare bombshell who impulsively gets engaged, struggles with an impossible task as she tries to be both over-the-top obnoxious and sympathetic at the same time. What does work is Heigl and the dresses and the fact that, like Jane, most of the audience loves to get misty at weddings. Watching this film is like waiting to catch the bride’s bouquet, more anticipation than fulfillment.
Parents should know that this film includes some strong language and drinking (getting drunk portrayed as empowering). There are some sexual references, and characters have sex with people they just met. There is a non-explicit (and alcohol-induced) sexual situation. There is some comic violence, including slaps.
Families who see this movie should talk about why Jane loved weddings so much and why it was hard for her to say no. Why didn’t Kevin tell Jane about his assignment sooner? Have you ever been a bridesmaid or an usher or would you like to be one?
Families who enjoy this movie will also enjoy Runaway Bride, Picture Perfect, and My Best Friend’s Wedding.
Quick question. The group of friends I hang out with occasionally go to see a movie. And there’s one person in our group that desperately wants to see this but what I’m wondering is, is this going to be funny or atleast entertaining for five 13 year old boys?
I am doubtful that 13-year-old boys will find much to enjoy in this film. But if one of your friends is desperate to see it, it might be interesting to see what appeals to him/her and it might be more important to support that interest than to find a movie that everyone is excited about. If you do see it, let me know what you think!
Is this movie okay for my 13 yr. old niece to watch? She really wants to watch it but I read the review and am not sure. Please let me know going to movies this weekend.
“27 Dresses” has some questionable material — the main character gets drunk and has sex with someone, her best friend is proudly skanky, there are a few crude references — but it is milder than many PG-13s and indeed many broadcast television shows like “Two and a Half Men.” I’d ask her parents about the level of material she is comfortable with and see what they say.
Thanks for writing, Melinda, and please write again any time you have questions or comments.
You usually give your own age that you think it is appropriate for regardless of the MPAA rating. Would you say it’s OK for a mature 12 year old?
The above shown pink dress with flowers was originally designed as a prom dress by DeBora Rachelle (http://www.deborarachelle.com). You can still purchase the dress at http://www.promdressshop.com the same place the wardrobe person for 27 dresses purchased the dress from.