Leatherheads
Posted on April 3, 2008 at 6:00 pm
BLowest Recommended Age: | Middle School |
MPAA Rating: | Rated PG-13 for brief strong language. |
Profanity: | A few bad words |
Alcohol/ Drugs: | Drinking, drunkenness, speakeasies, smoking, drinking and smoking by a child |
Violence/ Scariness: | Fighting, peril, suicide attempt, brief non-explicit wartime battle scene |
Diversity Issues: | Integrated team, strong female character |
Date Released to Theaters: | April 4, 2008 |
Like the 1925 ragtag professional football team it follows, this movie has more high spirits than ability to deliver.
George Clooney directs and stars in this affectionate tribute to 1920’s “professional” football and 1930’s movie comedies, but it it captures more of the letter than the (high) spirit of the rat-a-tat-tat dialogue and ebullient effervescence of those Turner Classic Movie channel-worthy gems. It is entertaining without being especially memorable.
Clooney plays Dodge Connelly, a player on a failing team in a failing league. In 1925, football was a college sport. Cheering crowds filled college stadiums while professional football was disorganized on and off the field — or cow pasture, as the case might be. Dodge decides to recruit the top college player, Carter Rutherford (John Krasinski of The Office), who is not only a football hero but a real American WWI hero as well. Carter agrees to leave school because Dodge guarantees him a ton of money and because he is very happy to have a chance to keep playing. He is guided on this by his agent, CC Frazier (suitably, if silkily, satanic Jonathan Pryce), a character who raises the intriguing Jerry Maguire-ish question of whether pro sports would have been created without pressure from pro agents.
My 12-year old laughed throughout Leatherheads and she only came with me under duress.
I think warning about an attempted suicide in the movie is ridiculous.
Thanks, Steph! I am so glad your daughter enjoyed the movie. I liked it more than many of the critics.
Every family has a different list of what is and is not a concern for appropriateness. Many years ago, I received a very thoughtful email from a reader who reminded me about issues that may seem over-sensitive to some people but to others are reminders of a deeply painful loss. I promised her I would always mention references to suicide, even those intended to be light-hearted. I don’t mind erring on the side of disclosure to protect people from unpleasant surprises, for those who are not lucky enough to think of these references as ridiculous.
My husband and I are in our fifties, which means this movie was before “our time”. But we thoroughly enjoyed it, being fans of movies based on history, true happenings/people. We didn’t think it was too “schmaltzy”. We took everything in the spirit of the movie and the times it depicted, and got a kick out of the music, clothes, cars, etc. And there were just good feelings afterwards, no nightmares from gore and blood and killings, no high blood pressure and tension. We would like to see more movies like this one! And we’re not old fuddy-duds, either. We’ve saw “Gone, Baby, Gone” and “I am Legend”, too.
Thanks, Patty! I also thought it was a lot of fun.
Nell – please keep up the good work! I have four sons ages 10 to 21, and they’ve learned to check Movie Mom before we watch a family movie as a group. Also, I agree that mentioning any suicide reference is important, especially for families who have xperinced his tragedy.
Thanks so much, Pauline! My best to you and your family and I hope you and your sons will visit often and let me know what you think about the movies you see.