Thunderstruck

Posted on August 23, 2012 at 6:00 pm

C
Lowest Recommended Age: Kindergarten - 3rd Grade
MPAA Rating: Rated PG for mild language and rude humor
Profanity: Some schoolyard language ("sucks," "crap")
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: None
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: August 24, 2012

This “Freaky Friday” with basketball keeps throwing airballs.

It’s the story of Brian (Taylor Gray) a sixteen-year-old kid who wishes he could have the skills of Olympic gold medalist and NBA star Kevin Durant playing himself, not very convincingly but with an engaging low-key unpretentiousness.

A magical basketball (don’t bother trying to figure it out; the movie doesn’t) switches their abilities.  Suddenly Brian can’t miss and KD can’t even make a free throw.  Brian goes from being the subject of jeers and humiliation in the school cafeteria to being a big man on campus, with the entire student body wearing shirts in his honor.  And to the dismay of his agent (Brandon T. Jackson) and the poor director moaning “take 47” as they try to film a commercial for KD’s new shoes, KD can’t get out of his slump.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0wiLTsDqag

Brian first meets KD at half-time, when he has just been given the chance to do a free throw for a big prize.  Instead of hitting the basket, he hit the mascot.  “I wish I had your talent,” Brian says.  “I wish you did, too,” KD tells him, but then says that it is hard work that matters more than talent.  That is a good message for kids but the entire premise of the movie is the opposite.  Both Brian and KD work very hard but it makes no difference in either case.  This is typical of the carelessness of the script.  Even the good guy characters are self-centered and without any interest in learning anything new.  The coaches (Jim Belushi and his son, Robert) have no understanding of the game’s skills or strategy and no interest in the team other than winning.  “Don’t suck!” is their charming mantra.  When it comes time for the big pep talk before the championship game, the best they can do is recite some lines from “Hoosiers.”  Plagiarism and insincerity — a nice lesson for the kids, both those on the team and those who are watching.

Parents should know that this movie has some schoolyard language (“it sucks,” “crap”), crotch hits, brief potty humor, and some bullying.

Family discussion:  Why did Kevin and his agent react differently when Kevin lost his talent?  Why did Brian become thoughtless and hurt his friends’ feelings?  If you could have someone’s talent, who would you pick?

If you like this, try: “Like Mike” and “Rookie of the Year”

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Fantasy Movies -- format School Sports Stories About Kids

Premium Rush

Posted on August 23, 2012 at 6:00 pm

He’s a Manhattan bicycle messenger and his name is Wilee, like the coyote.  But Wilee (the always-brilliant Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is more like the road runner in this story.  He has an envelope to deliver, and Bobby (Michael Shannon) wants to stop him.  This nifty little thriller does not need much more than that to hold our attention.  And yes, it delivers.

Director and co-writer David Koepp (writer of “Spider-Man,” “Panic Room,” and “Jurassic Park”), like his hero, pares everything down to the essentials, and that means removing the brakes.  Wilee explains that his bike has no gears and no brakes.  It cannot coast, so the pedals never stop turning.  “People risk their lives for 80 bucks on a good day,” he tells us.  But he loves the freedom, the adrenalin, the constant recalibrating as he swerves in and out of traffic and tries to stay safe in a city were “door” is a verb and getting “doored” (slamming into an opening car door) can cause major injuries.

Just as Wilee is constantly juggling and recalibrating his options as he determines his strategy for getting to his destination as quickly and as safely as possible, with the priority on speed.  Koepp takes us inside Wilee’s head as he looks down different paths and calculates what the outcome will be for each one.  He applies the same sort of calculus to the rest of his life.  He graduated from law school but never took the bar because he cannot see himself wearing a suit to an office, at least not now.  He cares about his girlfriend, Vanessa (Dania Ramirez), but he cannot plan far enough into the future to manage to get to her graduation.  He likes being in the moment.  He does not like anything that reminds him of the other life beyond the urgency of making the deadline.  He loves being a part of the few, the proud, the bike messengers — in a world of email and FedEx, there are still some things that have to be carried in person — but he is feeling increasingly competitive with Manny (Wole Parks), who seems to be chasing Wilee on the streets and Vanessa after hours.

Nobody gets mad better than Michael Shannon.  I do not want to give away too much about what he is trying to do and why, so I will just say that he is great as a volatile man cracking under extreme pressure.   Like Wilee, he looks from side to side to evaluate his options and is still just about able to continue to appear normal when he needs to.  Koepp keeps the gears moving like a Swiss watch, hitting rewind to show us how the characters got to where they are but keeping the pacing tight, with just the right touches of comedy, romance, and plot for a nicely satisfying little late-summer treat.

Note: Be sure to stay for the credits to see a clip showing Gordon-Levitt’s real-life on-set accident, which required 31 stitches on his arm.

Parents should know that this film includes extended peril and some violence including bicycle accident and a gun, characters injured and killed, and some strong language (one f-word).

Family discussion:  Why did Wilee prefer being a messenger to being a lawyer?  What does his name tell us about him?  What did the movie gain from being told out of order?

If you like this, try: “Quicksilver” with Kevin Bacon, “Cellular,” and “The Transporter”

 

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Crime Thriller

The Expendables 2

Posted on August 23, 2012 at 4:37 pm

The Botox budget must be bigger than the catering costs but less than the ordnance in this sequel to Sylvester Stallone’s first round-up of the 80’s and 90’s A-Team for an action extravaganza.  That’s A as in AARP.

This time, our heroes: Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Terry Crews, Dolph Lundgren and Randy Couture, along with their summer intern and obvious redshirt Liam Hemsworth are on a rescue mission.  I’m not going to bother with their character names because the point of this movie is the actors, not the characters.

The guy tied to a chair and about to be tortured is hooded, so you know we are in for a big wink-wink surprise, and yes, it is former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who said, “This is embarrassing.”  The group rescues him and the Chinese billionaire he was guarding and then literally drops the client off by tossing him out of a plane with Li to guide him down.  Li wisely exits the movie at this point, so my hopes for a rematch with Lundgren were tossed out of the plane with him.

Mr. Church (Bruce Willis) calls in a favor that has Stallone and the gang out for a job he insists is simple.  All they  have to do is retrieve the contents of a safe in a plane that crashed.  They will need to take Maggie (the “combat proficient” Nan Yu) along, despite Stallone’s grousing that he does not want to be anyone’s babysitter.  Hemsworth comes along for what he says will be his last job because he wants to quit to be with his wonderful girlfriend.  He might as well be wearing a sign that says DBTA.

Or, he could be wearing a sign that says, “I am here to let the bad guy show everyone how really, really bad he is.  Here I am, cute as a kitten and calling everyone ‘Sir’ and sacrificing myself for the others, so he must be really, really bad.”  We also know he is really, really bad because (a) he is played by Jean Claude Van Damme wearing very mean-looking sunglasses and (b) his character’s name is, I am not kidding, Vilian.

The over-the-hill gang engages in various shoot-outs punctuated by lame wisecracks that refer to their iconic roles.  Do you want to guess whether someone says, “I’ll be back?”  At its best, it’s like watching a theme park stunt spectacular, one set-up after another, with brief distractions as the guys bond by discussing what they would pick for their last meal or just by the usual macho put-downs.  Not that any of these guys were great actors to begin with, but they are less so, now.  Between the Botox and the scar tissue, their faces don’t really move anymore.  As the movie goes on, Li’s decision to literally bail out seems like the wisest move.

Parents should know that this film includes constant mayhem, peril, and violence, chases, explosions, fights, assault weapons, many characters injured and killed, drinking, smoking, and mild sexual references.

Family discussion: What did Barney mean when he said “we keep it light until it is time to get dark.”  Why did he agree to fight the bad guy without weapons?

If you like this, try: the earlier action films starring these actors and the first “Expendables” movie

 

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Series/Sequel

Interview: Julie Steiner of Percy 3D

Posted on August 23, 2012 at 8:21 am

Percy 3D lets you “put yourself in the picture.  And I spoke to founder and president Julie Steiner about what it is and how it does that.

What is Percy 3D?

We take either existing video or new video that we create and we allow users to insert messages or images directly into that video using 3-D visual effects.  The goal is to make it look like it is part of the video. Percy is short for “personalized” and 3-D refers to the fact that our personalizations take place in 3-D space, so it is all about visually dynamic, personalized messages.

Because our personalization uses the same 3-D visual effects technology used in the movie.  We entered into an agreement with Universal and Paramount and we have taken short clips of movies and we allow users to insert short messages into their favorite movies as if it were part of the movie and send them to their friends.

Do people pay to do that or is that considered a promotion for the movie?

There could be small micro-payments for that or we could work with a client for promotional use. But this is really just a way to demonstrate our platform.  We have samples that include a ‘birthday e-vite.”’ This is using our own Percy character but you can imagine any character in place of Percy.  We’re going to be making this available with all the traditional response control that you might expect with your traditional evites.  It’s a party management tool. But that is one of the areas, that is the license side of the business that we’re working with, and the other side of our business is for marketing purposes, promotional use, things like that. It’s specifically for brand use.  We always say if you picture any large brand that has a character, we allow you to create a fun little video with your character.

Here in Canada we have a gas company called Esso, and Esso has a tiger, the Esso tiger, and they use him in their promotional gift cards and things like that. So for instance, let’s say I’m Esso and I make a gas card, so in the physical world of course you’ve got your gas card, your plastic credit-card like loyalty card and it’s always mounted on a piece of paper, to Nell from Julie, great job or whatever it happens to be…we like to consider ourselves as ‘the digital envelope.’ So for instance, if you take that physical thing into the digital world—so instead of a physical card that is mounted on a piece of cardboard, let’s say we create a little video with the Esso tiger and the Esso tiger is saying something cute, whatever it happens to be, and that’s where I write my personal message, To: Nell, From: Julie, enjoy this card  — the difference being is that now if I’ve created a funny, interesting little thing, not only does it have the purpose of acting as my digital envelope to send it to you, but then the recipient, once they receive it, presumably it’s an entertaining little thing that they’ve gotten, they can then put their own message and send it to another friend, someone totally different. So what we allow you to do is send your own message and extend the brand message as well.

Are these things intended to go from individual to individual in a viral way or are you anticipating that people will put them up on their websites or put them on their blogs or tweet about them?

There are really any number of uses. As I said, on the license side of things it is the more traditional evite, ecard, that kind of thing where I’m sending it to you, I’m inviting ten kids to my party and each child gets their own name, using licensed character that kids love. Especially with young kids, they like to watch and watch the same stuff over again, if they see their own name with that character, that is sort of a more traditional use, from me to you, and that’s that, but on the branded side of things it is a great way to get a personalized message out. Let’s say I’m a company and I want to send out a massive message but make it personalized to each person, so it’s almost like a one-way communication from a company to an individual, but then by allowing that individual to then take it and create their own message and send it to a friend, then it’s more of a viral thing. How we use these things makes no difference—if it’s sending to a friend, posting on your own website, Facebook, whatever it happens to be. We’re a video personalization platform so there are any number of things that we can do, but those are the two main areas that we play in.

How would you say that this kind of use of these clips enhances the brand of a particular movie that is just about to be released or has been released?

In the case of Universal and Paramount it was very specifically meant to bring younger audiences into some of the older films.  It’s funny to call a movie that is 20 years old a “classic,” but these are classics that they may have missed. I myself am a mother of teenagers and my kids have never seen, for instance, “Animal House.” They’ve never seen it. They took one look at John Belushi with his mouth full of mashed potatoes, when he says, “What am I now? Can you take a guess of what I am now?” and he spits out the mashed potatoes, and of course your message is in the mashed potatoes.  They took one look at that and were like, “Oh, I’ve got to see that movie!” So it allows the studios to reach a new, younger audience, the new younger audience that may have missed some of these “classics” of their parents’ era.

As the mother of teenagers, what do you see about this new generation in terms of the way they look at brands?

We have five teenagers in our house, so I am endlessly fascinated by the way they consume media. When we were kids, you were always on the phone watching TV. Our kids don’t talk on the phone, nor do they watch TV. They text each other and they watch their computers. They consume media so differently, and if they like something, they’ll post it on their Facebook wall. Kids are identifying so much more with a brand—if they like a brand, they’re sort of pointing to that brand and saying, “This is who I identify with.” It’s a great way for a brand to make available something cool and clever and fun with their brand—and I’d especially point to brands with identifiable icons or logos that we can play with and things like that. Letting your fans play with your icons and then share them is great because more and more research is coming out showing that if you receive a branded message from your friend you’re far more likely to act on it than if you receive it directly from the company.  So what we’re trying to do is really give brands (or in the case of these movies) we’re giving kids a way to identify with these things and show their friends what they like.

Can you give me an example of a movie property that you think is especially well suited to what you’re talking about?

The movies that work best for us are comedies, iconic scenes in movies, CG features, kid’s movies. I always go back to being in high-school. In your high-school yearbook everyone would pick a quote–more often than not from a movie–that you identify with. That’s really what we’re trying to do here in so many ways. Often we’re looking for a great line in a movie that you identify with.

Related Tags:

 

Advertising
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik