The Kings of Summer

Posted on June 6, 2013 at 6:00 pm

kings_of_summer_posterWhen Mark Twain had Huck Finn leave the kind-hearted widow who hoped to “civilize” him to “light out for the territories,” he tapped into the dream of all teenagers and the teenagers inside all of us to escape from all rules and restrictions and create our lives from scratch.  Peter Pan and the Lost Boys had Neverland.  Baby boomers sang along with Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young about “trying to get ourselves back to the garden.”  Every generation wishes for the simplicity and purity of the natural world.  In the wise, touching, and often wildly funny “The Kings of Summer,” three 15-year-olds follow their own call of the wild to run away from home and build a house in the woods. Their parents may see them as boys, but they want a place where they can define what it means to be men.

Nick Robinson, who perfected a look of exquisite pain at the humiliating behavior of his father in a brilliant series of Cox cable commercials, plays Joe Toy.  He lives with his widowed father, Frank (“Parks and Recreation’s” Nick Offerman in a witty and heartfelt performance).  Of course at that age, a parent does not have to do anything to be excruciatingly embarrassing.  It is bad enough that Frank actually exists, but he also has the nerve to tell Joe what to do.  Worse, he is dating someone, and worst of all he expects Joe to play a board game with her.  The horror!

Joe’s best friend Patrick (Gabriel Basso), is smoldering with his own adolescent fury.  His parents say things like, “Rope in the attitude, mister” and just because his ankle is in a cast, they want him to be careful. How dare they!  “I’m happy to be where my parents are not,” he says.

Another kid named simply  Biaggio (the wonderfully oddball Moises Arias) wants to join them.  He does not have any special problem with his family.  He just “didn’t want to do nothing.”

Joe, Patrick, and Biaggio build their house in the woods.  They breathe the air of free men and rejoice in their liberation from all rules and conventions.  They vow “to boil our own water, kill our  own food, build our own shelter, be our own men.”  If foraging for food in the woods means a stop by the Boston Market across the highway from the forest, well, no one can argue with how good it tastes.

Director Jordan Vogt-Roberts  and writer Chris Galletta bring a fresh and sympathetic eye to the story, evoking the pleasure of what feel — for a little while — like endless possibilities.   The film perfectly captures that liminal moment when teenagers live in the space between childhood and becoming an adult.  And they’re old enough to carry it off, at first.  They are young enough to be certain their parents are wrong about pretty much everything — and to be confident that they can do everything better.   The house is like something the Lost Boys might build for Peter Pan, with a stolen door from a port-a-potty for the entrance and essentials like a mailbox, a slide, a basketball hoop, and an air hockey table.As is often the case with boys of 15, they look like they are from three different planets.   Patrick is muscular and physically much more mature than the others and Biaggio could be 12.  Joe is somewhere in the middle.  Biaggio’s random and inscrutable pronouncements are amusingly accepted by the other two as if they made as much sense as anything else, or as if making sense did not matter.  And of course the most unexpected complication is when a girl comes through the port-a-potty door.

Like that other icon of the dream of escaping the oppression of civilization, Henry David Thoreau, the boys learn that there is a time to go to the woods, and a time to come home.

Parents should know that this movie has very strong and crude language and teen drinking and smoking.

Family discussion:  What was the most important thing Joe learned?  What about Frank?  What would you bring to a house in the woods?

If you like this, try:  “Stand By Me”

 

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Drama Independent

Interview: Stuntwoman Gaelle Cohen

Posted on June 5, 2013 at 8:00 am

gaelle cohen

It was a great treat to talk with Gaelle Cohen, the French fencing champion turned stunt woman behind some of the movies’ most remarkable action scenes.  She told me the unexpected extra challenge faced by a woman doing stunts and which classic James Bond stunt she always wishes she had a chance to perform.

What was the first stunt you ever did in a film?

I actually started with a TV show, but in a film my first stunt was with a movie called Young Blades and it was with that actor Hugh Dancy, who is now the main actor in Hannibal. I think it was a twenty five feet tree, and I was sliding down the rope hitting a guy that was passing on horseback and we were both falling off the horse after that. 

It was great.  I started on the TV show called Highlander.  I was a bad girl and I was getting killed.  Their head was chopped off.  Sixteen years ago and that’s actually how I started.  It was just a coincidence that I ended up on that set doing a short fight.  When I did it, I thought, “Oh my God this is what I want to do.”  

So when you were a child were you a daredevil?

No, I was not.  This is a question that I think almost all journalists ask all stunt people.  And no, I was not daredevil at all.  I was actually afraid of heights.  I couldn’t go down stairs.  I had to go down, you know, sitting on my butt and going one step after another.   Then the fear just left.  I was seventeen. I have no idea how it left.  I think that one of the main qualities of a good stunt person is to actually be aware of danger.  I think daredevils’ are, are more “Oh whatever, I just want to do it.” And we’re not like that.  We are careful.  We know what we’re doing and we analyze things before doing them.

What are some of the safety procedures that you think are very important?

It starts with yourself.  You have to be trained and you have to be skilled.  So, if you don’t have that it’s like jumping off a thirty feet cliff into the water.  You have to be aware of your limits as well, know what you can do, what you can try to do, and what you really can’t do.  So you’re responsible for your own safety.  Also that on set you have a stunt coordinator who is in charge of the stunt people and in charge of the scene and of the safety of the scene, so you rely a lot on him.  Usually I work with people that I know, I respect, I admire, and I put one hundred percent of my trust in their hands.  And then, beside that there is a lot of pads, and equipment that you use on set that are there to protect you if you can use them.

For woman it’s very rare to be able to use the pads because most of the time actresses in movies, I don’t know why, they are wearing very  little clothing….

Yes, I think I know why that is…

Oh you do?   I think I know too!  So seriously we’re just fighting and being kicked out of cars in, in miniskirts and high heels, and so for us it’s really hard to pad up as men are able to do.  

Do you have to spend a lot of time in wardrobe and hair and makeup to help you look like the actress you are supposed to be?

Sometimes we do, sometimes we don’t.  Actually it’s very enjoyable to sit in the chair, have someone, you know, make up your hair for an hour and then do your makeup.  It’s the very girly part of the job that we enjoy.  Sometimes it’s just make your hair the way she is and here you go.  And sometimes the transformation requires more time and you spend between thirty minutes to an hour and a half in the chair.

Is there a stunt from a classic movie that you look at and you say, “Boy I would like to have done that one?”

Yes.  Oh yes.  It’s one of the James Bond movies with Pierce Brosnan.  I think it’s the first one he did. There’s the big water reservoir?  And he’s on the top of that and he puts a rope on his ankle and he’s just diving.  I don’t know how high that fall was.  It was played with what we call the descender, which is a wire connected to a computer that makes the speed of your fall go from really fast to slow, slow, slow until it stops at a certain point, so it’s very smooth.  But it’s still a great jump so I would have loved to do that.  It’s fantastic.  It’s very elegant, the way the guy, the double dives.  It looks so easy when we all know it is not.  

Tell me a little bit about performing in “Zero Dark Thirty.”

It was literally a dream come true.  I was shooting a movie in Europe and I received a phone call from one of the Production Managers who says, “Would you be available to work with us in Jordan from that day to that day?”  And I say, “Yes, I am, sure.  Um…  But what is it for?”  “Um…  Um…  It’s a movie…  And well we’ll get in touch for the transportation and all that.”  And I’m like, “Well what am I going to have to do?”  “Oh I don’t know you’ll speak with the Coordinator.”  So I was like, “Okay, I’m going to go somewhere, do something and I have no idea.”

We’re used to that, but not knowing on what you’re working and what you’re going to have to do, that’s even weirder.  So, I arrive in Jordan, in the middle of the night after three planes, and I arrive on the set which looks like a bunker, and I’m like, “What is that movie?”  And I’m waiting for hair and makeup to seat me and say, “Yes, you’re good to go,” and I see her, Katherine Bigelow coming out of that bunker, and I’m like a kid in a candy store.  I swear probably my mouth was open because, when she won the Oscar for “The Hurt Locker,” I remember thinking, “Oh my gosh just one day…  Just one day  if I could get the chance to work for her.”  And there it is.  And I was, seriously, I thought, “I can stop now,” because she’s the ultimate female dream for me.  And then I get to do the, uh, the biggest action scene of the movie.   It was an amazing opportunity.  An amazing movie…  Fantastic lady…  And a great action to perform, so…  It’s one of my best memories.  It was short, it was only two weeks, but, it was fantastic.  Really.

What is it like to be a stunt coordinator?

It’s a completely different story than just being a stunt performer.  Stunt performer you’re in shape, you know your skill, your art, you go in.  You follow what the Stunt Coordinator does.  You do your best and there you go.  As a Stunt Coordinator, you’re really in charge of the action scenes of the movie, so have a real complicity with the director since day one of production.  Personally what I like to do is see everything the director has done, to see his universe, how he’s seeing the world, basically.  And I picture that to that vision.  And then, you have meetings and, and you propose things.  You propose fights. You propose things.  You show them, on video or live.  The director comes to your rehearsal place and you show him, and then he says no or he says yes or he says I like it but I want to change some things.  So, you just adapt yourself to, uh, to his muse and his, uh, wish.  You just have your stunt team with you and you try to make the double look as good as possible compared to the actor and, and you just do your best in creating the action scene based on what the director has in his head.  The job of a Stunt Coordinator is more complex.  It’s a work of creation.  Basically you see a drawing, a storyboard, of a set, on the production table and you have to be able to create the whole scene with the actors in that area.   It’s a more creative job.  And also it’s a job with big responsibility.  Beside the quality of the shooting that you are providing you also have the security, the safety of the whole set of your team, but also, you know, during the stunts, you have to make sure that the whole crew is safe.  It’s actually more comfortable to be just the performer.  You’re not responsible.  You don’t have to deal with budget.  You don’t have to deal with production.  You don’t have to deal with the casting.  You don’t have to deal with actors,  because you don’t have to train them for anything.  You just come, do your stunts, and leave. 

Are there still barriers for women in getting the Coordinator positions?

I’m from France and I moved in the States five years ago mainly for that reason.  I was a Stunt Coordinating Assistant for many, many years and to a point where sometimes the Coordinator was not even there set up the scene and train the actors.  He would just be there and go on set the day of the shooting, and it was, it was fine until a day where I said, “Why can’t I go with you?”  And he said, “Because I’m the Coordinator,” and I said, “Yeah but I, I created that fight and actors trained with me and the Director knows me.”  And he said, “Well, you keep your place, you’re an  Assistant and I’m the Stunt Coordinator.”  And I said, “Why can’t a woman be a Stunt Coordinator?”  And he answered, “Woman…  A woman being a Stunt Coordinator… That will happen when pigs will fly.”

Before that, I was not that interested in being a Coordinator, but, when he said that — now I think it’s my goal.  I started getting some shows.  And also, you know, I was pushed by some actors and directors, telling me, “How come you’re not in charge of the movie since you’re so good?”  And I was telling them, “Well because, you know, I’m young in the business.  Those guys have more experience,” and they were like, “It doesn’t matter.  If you’re good at what you’re doing, you should, you should, step up and do it now.”  So, I was pushed by people like that and I decided soon to do it.  And after a while, I started receiving messages from Coordinators saying, “Oh you want to get…  You want to take our job?  Well fine then, you know what, you will never work again as a Performer for us.  So, I was like, “Okay I’m going to start basically because those guys do not appreciate the fact that I’m becoming a Stunt Coordinator…”  So, I decided to move, and work here, in a  brand new country where nobody would judge me.  And, actually in the States men are way more tolerant than in Europe.  There are some really good stunt woman that are Stunt Coordinators.  They are respected.  Nobody would even think about, you know, trying to undercut them, or not work with them because they’re a woman.  

Related Tags:

 

Behind the Scenes

“The Emperor’s New Groove” — A Neglected Gem from Disney

Posted on June 5, 2013 at 7:19 am

I am really pleased that one of my favorite Disney animated movies, “The Emperor’s New Groove,” will be out on Blu-Ray next week.  It is a neglected gem, colorful and very funny, with wonderfully executed sight gags and action and a great story, with an Oscar-nominated song from Sting.  It’s about an arrogant and selfish young emperor (David Spade) who is turned into a llama by the evil Yzma (voiced by the magnificent growl of Eartha Kitt).

Here is a glimpse and a song from Tom Jones.

 

Related Tags:

 

Not specified

My Thoughts on Happiness, Work, and Family

Posted on June 4, 2013 at 3:34 pm

Many thanks to the Huffington Post for publishing my thoughts on happiness, work, and family in connection with this week’s Third Metric Conference.

Pretty much everything you’ve ever been told about what will make you happy and secure is wrong.

You shouldn’t be surprised to hear that. In your heart, you know that you’ve been listening to the two least trustworthy sources in the world. The first is the people who want to sell you the idea that doing what they want you to do, whether it is buying some product or accomplishing some goal, will make you feel better about yourself.

The second is even more insidious. It’s that little voice inside you that has internalized all the people who made you feel embarrassed or inadequate — your judgmental aunt, your crabby teacher, the mean girls, your awful boss, your frenemies. They are the people who keep you thinking that you do not deserve to be loved, even by yourself — especially by yourself.

Those are the voices of the first and second metrics — money, power, being thin, looking young and somehow achieving the kind of professional success that gets you on magazine covers while giving exquisitely-prepared dinner parties and raising children who ace their SATs. It is time to talk about the third metric — cherishing intimacy, finding meaning and doing work that matters, what Jewish tradition calls tikkun olam: healing the world.

It is true that some people achieve true happiness primarily through professional achievements. Those are the people who know from the moment they’re born that they were put on this earth to break world records and create great works of art and run big organizations. Good for them. We need them. But that does not mean we want to try to be them when that’s not who we are.

We speak of a “third metric” because we are trying to braid three different strands: work, family, ourselves. That begins by getting rid of the notion of work-life balance. There is no such thing. It’s just like a board game: you have to choose between hearts, stars and dollars. You don’t balance them. You establish your priorities.

For most people, men and women, that will mean that what comes first is your adult intimate relationship. I am not saying this out of some retro ’50s women’s magazine notion of being responsible for your partner’s domestic happiness. My advice applies equally to men and women. Whether or not you believe that a loving, intimate partnership is the key to happiness, I think you will agree with this: We make our biggest mistakes in our professional lives when we try to make them fill the space we are missing in our personal lives. If you know who you are at home, if you get what you need emotionally and spiritually at home, you will be a better, more professional, more capable person at the office. It is just as important for single people to make their adult outside-of-work connections their priority.

It may sound heretical to say that the kids come second. My husband and I had the lifeboat conversation like every other parent and agreed that while we loved each other deeply, we would of course save the kids over each other. That is the choice you make when you become a parent. We love our children selflessly. Anchoring yourself in your primary adult relationship is a great perspective restorer that will make you a better parent. It will keep you from boundary issues with your kids that happen when we ask them to be better us-es than better thems.

And here is a thought that is even more heretical: Your first duty to your family is your own happiness. It takes enormous courage to be happy. It takes a bracing honesty with yourself. It takes a constant sense of gratitude and a lot of thank you’s to everyone, from those closest to you to those you will see only once. It takes a clear notion of happiness that is separate from pleasure. Pleasure is important, too, but it is not happiness.

And there’s an added bonus: you will be more successful, by any standard, at work as well. You will project an air of confident authority and you will make wiser decisions. People will want to work with you and for you.

Being happy does not require everything in your life to be perfect and contentment does not mean that you have lost sight of what needs to be fixed. The Talmud says, “It is not upon you to finish the work, but you are not free to ignore it.”

You can start very simply, by resisting the temptation to go to a place of snark, smugness and sarcasm. Of course you should share real problems with real friends. But those eye-rolling “joke” insults are not funny; they are toxic. It means not spending time worrying about things you can’t control, especially how anyone else feels about you. Stop expecting that your work, your partner, or your family will make you happy. It’s the other way around. You are happy first.

You deserve to be happy. And the adults and children in your family deserve a happy you. In a recent TED talk, Bruce Feiler described a study that asked 1,000 children what they would most want to change about their lives. They said they wished their parents were less stressed. Children deserve to have parents who do not seem overwhelmed. We all say we want our children to be happy. The best way to make that happen is to be a model of someone who knows how to be happy.

Related Tags:

 

Media Appearances

Interview: Jordan Vogt-Roberts of The Kings of Summer

Posted on June 4, 2013 at 7:17 am

Jordan Vogt-Roberts’s first feature film is “The Kings of Summer,” the story of three teenage boys who run away and build a house in the woods.  It’s one of my favorite movies of the year, so I was very glad to get a chance to talk to him about it.

How did you get involved with this project?

I made a short a few years ago called “Successful Alcoholics.”  It balanced tone in a similarly tricky way, starting out funny and then getting more serious.  And the company that did “Little Miss Sunshine” had this script.  They were looking for a director and I was looking for a movie.  I got into this business because I want to make movies.  I’d been doing TV and commercials and that’s great to work your way up.  But then I read this script and I fell in love with it.  I knew it was exactly the movie that I needed to make.  Not that I could or wanted to  — I needed to tell this story.  So I just pitched my ass off, and spent the next couple of months trying to get the job.  I didn’t want to say that someone else beat me on merit.  It had a jumping off point I wanted for my first feature, a lot of different things at once, magic and beautiful and hilarious — there was so much fun that I could have with it.

You were working with young kids, which is a challenge. 

The movie lives and dies with the kids. I have an incredible adult cast — stand-ups and improvisers and brilliant comics like Alison Brie, Nick Offerman, and Megan Mullally.  But the movie rests completely on the kids.  All of them had to be good.  When you watch “Stand By Me” or “The Goonies,” all of those kids are great.  I couldn’t cast 25-year-olds.  I had to cast kids who  as much as they could go through what the characters were going through, who could be as real and awkward as the characters they played.  And Gabe and Nick and Moises really took over the roles at a certain point.  I forgot what the characters were as scripted and it started becoming them. We did improv training, not so they’d be super-quick and witty and punchy but just so they’d be comfortable enough in their own skin so that if I didn’t yell cut or changed something on the fly, they could adapt to it.  My favorite stuff in the movie, a really important part of the movie, is those moments, just glances or mannerisms, that’s what it was to be that age.  A movie like this is made up of small, little moments, where watch it and you say, “I love that.”  I just wanted to give those kids the trust and faith so they could elevate it themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYQvwJ0G7qQ

The moments that I love are the three jump kids of him exiting the house in different ways, that’s how a kid would pass time.  That came from him and me just playing around about the best way to do it.  There are so many weird little moments that stem from them cracking me up.  I made a weird decision on set where I didn’t want them to think of me as the boss or watch themselves around me.  So they would punch me in the arm and treat me as though I was a kid.  We created a fun environment.  The stuff where they were banging on the pipe, finding out that Gabe played the violin and adding that to the movie.  That adds authenticity because it is so particular.  The unscripted things are what make me laugh.

In another movie, some of the things Joe’s father said could be disturbing, but you made it feel safe.

A lot of it is that it is from the perspective of the kids, so we know that it is heightened.  They can feel a little bit more overbearing or harsher because that is how the kids were perceiving it.  And we ran the spectrum of emotions without turning them into caricatures.  We did some ridiculously funny things but to ideally always have it be informing the character and the story and the moment.

Related Tags:

 

Directors Independent Interview
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik