Interview: Vera Farmiga of ‘Higher Ground’

Interview: Vera Farmiga of ‘Higher Ground’

Posted on August 24, 2011 at 3:48 pm

Vera Farmiga (“The Departed,” “Up in the Air”) directed and stars in a new film based on the memoir by Carolyn S. Briggs, Higher Ground: A Memoir of Salvation Found and Lost.  As she spoke to a small group of reporters in a Georgetown hotel, it was clear that she shares her character’s passionate yearning for an intimate connection with the Almighty.

I began by asking her about her character’s hair, which seems to reflect not just the changing fashions over the decades covered in the film, but her spiritual and emotional state as well.  “It was three different time periods.  The church changes.  It goes from worshipping outside to worshipping in basements, hallways, annexes, to a proper, steeple-topped church.  As the hippies turn into yuppies, so do the hairstyles.  Her hair starts off wild and carefree and long and tangled.  And passionate.  And then there are the trials and tribulations and ebbs and flows of her path, and she engages in spiritual warfare and her hair also has its phases.  Childbirth, and then she gets shorter.  We did a perm curl – it gets corrupted.  It gets poisoned — by a home perm!  And then by the end it’s a looser wave, gentler.”

She admitted that this book was an unusual choice for her debut as a director.  “It chose me.  I really feel that way.  I tried to wriggle out of its grasp, several times.  Every time I tried, something else would happen that made it unstoppable….It touched me in divinely mysterious ways.  It slayed me in the spirit.  I loved this woman’s yearning to be passionate in her faith and all her relationships.  That yearning is such a holiness to me that it touched me in a very deep way.  I wanted to defend her journey….It was so juicy to me….I had a lot of ideas I wanted to bring into the film, ideas about music and praise and worship and joy.”  It began to come together when her mentor, Deborah Granick, agreed to advise her and John Hawkes (from Granick’s “Winter’s Bone” agreed to appear in the film. “Before I knew it, I was on the set, having to deliver the last speech first.”  And after that, she relaxed and enjoyed it.

“A story about God tends to make people tremble,” she said, “as the Almighty should.  We all have our personal concepts of that that means.  But that three-letter word makes people quake, especially in Hollywood.”  But she had the support of her producers (including her husband) who “totally vibed with my vision, no mockery or judgment, just to look at how arduous that spiritual road is, how bumpy.  No matter what your religion is, what your spiritual tenets are, what your idea of God is, we’re all on the same human team, trying to transcend self and look upwards for healing and holiness.”

She spoke of learning from directors like Granik, Anthony Minghella, and Martin Scorsese about the spirit they bring to their work, “their leadership, their approach, their wholesomeness, their joy, the good cheer that they spread as they attack their missions.  In order for it to be a ‘holy experience,’ everyone’s got to be invested.  You have to treat them like kings and queens and show them you are truly grateful.”

Farmiga cast her real-life sister as the younger version of her character.  “We have the benefit of genetic similarity, so we did not have to do much as far as matching our performances.  We move in similar ways because of the house we grew up in, probably even the Ukranian folk-dancing!”

I asked her about the portrayal of the main character’s friendship in the film.  “I’ve learned so much from my best friends and they demand so much of me and inspire me in the ways that make me me.  The character is able to be her best carnal self and her best spiritual self because of her friendship with Annika.  We wanted to make it the most passionate and pure relationship — and then it gets taken away so she can find it within herself, the same energy, the same approach with the rest of her relationships, including her relationship with God.”

The tone of the film is respectful of all of its characters and their journeys.  “My heart and my intent, indigenous to my personality is not cynicism, but compassion and serenity and gentleness and respect.  I’m curious, what draws me into a story is recognizing my humanity, my imperfections, telling a story about struggle.  This is not a general statement about Christianity; this is a moment this woman found herself in.  We are still finding our voices.”

Related Tags:

 

Actors Directors Interview Spiritual films

Film Stage calls ‘One Day’ Toxic

Posted on August 24, 2011 at 8:00 am

I did not like One Day much and neither did the audience.  The box office in its first week of limited release was under estimates.  But it really riled up Kristy Puchko of Film Stage, who called it “the most toxic romance of the year.”  She objected to the disparity between the two.  Emma is thoughtful, principled, and diligent, while Dex is self-centered and spoiled.

The visual disparity in their appearance alone is striking. (It’s like Beauty and the Sex Offender.) But what it suggests about these characters status is even more shocking. To recap: when Emma was a frumpy loser with no career prospects, her romantic equal (according to Dex, the film’s ultimate protagonist) was a similarly stunted server with a hopeless goal. But now that Dex is the one who is lost, lonely and physically beat — he sees his romantic equal as wildly successful and enviably gorgeous Emma. This double standard asserts to impressionable audience members that girls should aspire to Lancome good looks to land even a once-handsome man.

SPOILER ALERT:  She also objects to the ending, which seems to suggest that Emma’s ultimate purpose was to sacrifice herself to give Dex a growth experience.  I had the same problem with both the book and movie and would be glad to hear from a fan who feels otherwise.

Related Tags:

 

Understanding Media and Pop Culture
Who Scares the Scarers?

Who Scares the Scarers?

Posted on August 23, 2011 at 3:59 pm

The New York Times asked people who make scary movies about the movies that scared them in a piece called What Spooks the Masters of Horror?  The answer turns out to be pretty much the same things that scare the rest of us.  Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining was mentioned by director Ti West (“The House of the Devil”) and Guillermo del Toro (“Blade” and this week’s “Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark”). The Exorcist terrified John Landis (“An American Werewolf in London”) and Eric Red (“The Hitcher”).  Check out what else scared who and why in this goosebumpy survey.

Related Tags:

 

Understanding Media and Pop Culture

Tribute: Nick Ashford and Jerry Lieber

Posted on August 23, 2011 at 12:19 pm

We mourn the passing of two greats who contributed to the soundtrack of our lives.  Nick Ashford, with his partner Valerie Simpson, wrote some of Motown’s most romantic and best-loved hits, including “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough,” “You’re All I Need to Get By,” and “Ain’t Nothing Like the Real Thing.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz-UvQYAmbg

Here he is with Simpson, with their own hit song, “Solid as a Rock:”

Jerry Lieber was the lyricist for 1950’s hits like “Hound Dog,” “Jailhouse Rock,” “Love Potion Number 9,” “Yakety Yak,” and these two classics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxRyPKYlIsc&feature=fvst

Here he and his writing partner Mike Stoller appear on “What’s My Line.”

May their memories be a blessing and their music live on forever.

Related Tags:

 

Music Tribute

Interview: Harry Markopolos of Chasing Madoff

Posted on August 22, 2011 at 5:32 pm

The award for the biggest “I told you so” of all time has to go to Harry Markopolos, who fought for nine years to convince anyone — regulator, prosecutor, journalist, or customer — that Bernard Madoff was a crook.  Finally, Madoff turned himself in for what turned out to be the biggest financial fraud in history.  At least, it’s the biggest one we know about so far. And it continues to make headlines, the latest today as a court ruled that Madoff victims cannot recover the fictitious profitsreflected on the statements they received.

Markopolos is the subject of a new documentary called “Chasing Madoff.”  He spoke to me about preventing and detecting fraud and the cases he is involved with now.  He will be attendng the Taxpayers Against Fraud conference in Washington, D.C. next month.

In the movie, you describe yourself as the boy who cried wolf — except that there was a wolf.

It felt like a fairy tale or was entering The Twilight Zone, no straight lines, just crooked lines.

I can understand why harried bureaucrats and conflicted politicians and journalists might be reluctant to tell the emperor he had no clothes. Madoff was a very connected and distinguished man. But why would the people who had money invested with him have no interest at all in asking him about the questions you raised?

The key point is that the smart people assumed he was front-running. That would put Madoff in jail if he was caught, but not the people who invested with him, and they’d still have the money. He was handling 5-10 percent of the stock value trades in the US and they assumed they were the beneficiaries of the fraud, not the victims. He intimidated people into not asking any questions. If you tried, he’d offer to give your money back. People did not pursue it because they wanted to remain in the money club.

Why would such a successful man think fraud was worth the risk?

You’re assuming he was successful before. He had a boiler room operation out of his apartment when he first entered in 1962. He had a 46-year-long crime spree.

Why did he finally give up?  To protect his sons?

To protect himself. It didn’t start out dangerous. When I saw the offshore hedge funds putting money in, I knew it was organized crime, laundering money against host nation tax authorities. Prison was the only place to keep him alive.

Do we know the truth now? Have you read his interviews since going to jail?

He is still lying. One or two or three things are true; the rest are lies. It is true that he hates me; he said that. He worked with the Chicago Board of Exchange and the big banks; they were willing conspirators. He named some names, threw some people under the bus. But three out of four of them are dead and the other one is 99 years old. There were a lot of people in bed with him.

Have any lessons been learned? Are we doing a better job of preventing and spotting fraud?

Not really. They should call them “compliant officers,” not “compliance officers.” Their specialty is looking the other way and not rocking the boat. You might as well give them a broom, they just sweep things under the rug. They are about appearances, not reality. Our cases against Bank of New York and State Street are moving forward and more are in the pipeline. For years, they were taking .3 of a percent from every trade for their pension fund clients.

Related Tags:

 

Crime Documentary Interview
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik