Guest Post: Tara Sonenshine on “Calvary”

Posted on September 17, 2014 at 11:19 pm

Brendan Gleeson in "Calvary"
Brendan Gleeson in “Calvary” Copyright Fox Searchlight 2014

My deepest thanks to Tara Sonenshine for allowing me to publish her thoughtful comments on “Calvary,” starring Brendan Gleeson as a troubled priest in a small Irish town.  It is a moving story of betrayal, despair, faith, and sacrifice.

Faith in Things: How A Movie Moves You

In what do you believe? In whom do you believe?

Those are separate but related questions in the recent film, “Calvary” starring Brendan Gleeson as an Irish priest, Father James, confronted by an agonizing life and death dilemma laid out in the first few minutes of the film. The movie opens inside a confessional, where an unseen parishioner — a childhood victim of a pedophile priest, promises to kill Father James as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of the Roman Catholic Church’s clerical brethren. The audience is not sure who this parishioner is—only that the murder of Father James will take place a week later even though the parishioner is clear that Father James is not a rapist nor a “bad” man, but must be killed to draw attention to the issue of sexual abuse. The entire premise is a bit unwieldy but the movie managed to hold my attention.

The film is really about Father James and his struggle to handle not only the threat to his life by this unseen parishioner, but other earthly troubles like his suicidal daughter (he was married before becoming a priest) and ministering to a host of depraved and troubled parishioners –any of whom might be motivated to kill. Suffice it to say the story is dark, depressing and full of despair as Father James deals with corrupt people, an uncertain clergy, and acts of betrayal including the burning down of his tiny church—the physical embodiment of his religious faith.

In the end, the film leaves you wondering, in what or whom Father James and others in the film believe. The inescapable question is—where is God?

I saw “Calvary” at a time when I had been thinking about faith as part of the annual summer run-up to the Jewish High Holidays. At this time of year, Jews start preparing for the start of Rosh Hashanah—the Jewish New Year, and Yom Kippur—the Day of Atonement. Both holidays tend to concentrate the mind on religious belief, on faith, and on the more mundane Jewish practice of juggling school dates with High Holiday tickets for services and filling out membership forms for synagogues. Only in America do Jews end up deciding if you want to worship during the holiest of days in the traditional synagogue or in the “over-flow” space at a local high school. (Despite the struggle that many synagogues today face to retain membership, these two special Jewish holidays –Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur- draw record numbers of worshippers and strain the ability of synagogues to accommodate everyone in one place.)

In an world of e-everything, there is also a new option– to simply stay home and follow a service online, via SKYPE, or, for that matter, an audio or video recording. More and more people simply forego membership or affiliation to a permanent house of worship and look for religious services on an ad hoc basis or online.  The very act of choosing a location in which to worship can become a test of faith, itself. Where is God? Is God in a physical place like a house of worship, or in a spiritual place within us? Do we even need places of worship if God is everywhere and anywhere? Why bother to find parking on the High Holidays if God is higher than a holiday—let alone pay membership dues to “belong,” to a synagogue. The internet is free. Maybe God even has his or her own Facebook page?

Having pondered the issue, I come down on the side of faith venues—a physical place of worship. There is something to be said for bricks and mortar in religion—be it a church, a mosque, a synagogue or simply a sanctuary where communities gather to worship, collectively.

Prayer is lonely business and for some, like me, it feels good to be surrounded by people during prayer. “Practicing” religion takes practice and houses of worship encourage it and symbolize it. Asked to choose between attending a service with others or “bowling alone,” I’d go with a place I can enter that is neither my home nor my work and where someone has put together an organized service to follow.

Asked to support a religious institution all-year round, I vote yes—even if I don’t use it all-year round. I want it to be there beyond me.

Organized religion has its fair share of critics. There are monetary requirements to operate religious institutions. As is revealed in “Calvary,” even the highest clergy members can be of dubious value. Houses of worship rely upon donations and donors—not all good ones. Someone has to pay to keep the lights on.  Institutions, even in an age of declining faith in them, do offer places and spaces for gathering.( It’s why many of us still go to movie theaters—the sense of community and tradition.)

Houses of worship provide physical reminders that religions are ancient. They remind us that centuries before us, others came to pray. The services keep communities believing in community—and give children a reason to complain as well as the fondest of memories about things and people of meaning.
Depending on your interpretation of the movie, “Calvary,” the Irish priest either finds faith (even without a physical church) or loses it despite his best efforts. Regardless, one is left hoping that traditions continue– that we leave legacies for others—and that faith is in the eyes of the beholder but must be something to behold.

Tara D. Sonenshine teaches media and public diplomacy at George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.

Related Tags:

 

Commentary

Why Are We Getting So Many Split POV Stories About Couples?

Posted on September 10, 2014 at 3:27 pm

I wonder why there are three (so far) different stories coming out that tell us the same saga of an up-and-down romance from two different perspectives (POV, or point of view).

“The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby,” starring James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain, is being released in three different versions, one called “The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them,” which alternates between her story and his, and then full-length feature films coming out later that each tell just one side of the story.

On “Showtime,” a new series called “The Affair” stars Dominic West and Ruth Wilson are the lovers who have a relationship we get to see from both points of view. The New York Times reports:

The affair begins after a happenstance meeting at a diner in Montauk, where Alison (Ms. Wilson) waits on Noah (Mr. West) and his family. Her recollection of the encounter differs from his on several crucial, often funny points, like her memory of wearing a knee-length waitress uniform: in his recollection, her skirt ends midthigh.

Anna Kendrick and Jeremy Jordan, both Broadway veterans, star in “The Last Five Years,” a film version of the popular musical that tells us both versions of the love story — with a twist. We see his story from the beginning to the end, but her version begins at the end and then goes back in time to the beginning.

It’s not unusual for a book to be told from the point of view of one character, whether narrated by an “I” in the first person or whether the narration just lets us hear the thoughts of one or more characters. In film, we often see what one character sees but it is rare to alternate points of view. One famous exception is the classic film Rashomon. A terrible, violent rape and murder is recounted by the man accused of the crime, the wife who was raped after her husband was killed, the ghost of the murdered man, and finally a witness. Many, many stories have been inspired or influenced by “Rashomon,” from a “Star Trek: TNG’s” episode “A Matter of Perspective” to “The Dick Van Dyke Show’s” hilarious “The Night the Roof Fell In.”

A far-from-classic example is a soapy pair of movies starring Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton called “Divorce: His” and “Divorce: Hers.” Yes, that twice-married/twice-divorced to each other (plus many others) pair should know. Mark Twain’s charming Diary of Eden gives us both Adam’s and Eve’s sides of the events of Genesis — witty and insightful, with the most deeply romantic ending of all his writing. Thanks to Kristie Miller for reminding me of Dave Berry’s classic piece about male/female thoughts about a relationship. I’m a huge fan of The Norman Conquests by the wildly talented Alan Ayckbourn. We don’t get the different perspectives of characters — we get three different plays that tell the same story from three different places, the living room, the dining room, and the garden. An exit in one play is an entrance in the other. The more you watch, the funnier it gets.

Is there a message in this new vogue for splintered storytelling? Are we in a moment of history when we are feeling a need to be more empathetic? Or are we less sure of what the truth is? Any answer I’d give, of course, would be from my own POV, so yours is just as valid. Isn’t it?

Related Tags:

 

Commentary Understanding Media and Pop Culture

Should Movie Audiences Text to the Screen?

Posted on September 2, 2014 at 3:59 pm

It is annoying enough when someone near you in a movie theater takes out a cell phone to text. Imagine how it would be if you then saw the text on the screen. That’s what a Chinese theater is experimenting with in what they are calling “bullet screens.” The idea is that what you are there to enjoy is not the film made by actors, cinematographers, costume and production designers, the editors, and the director, but instead to enjoy the wisecracks made by whoever felt like buying a ticket. It’s sort of like paying to watch “Sharknado” in a theater and read everyone’s texts instead of tweets.

Bad idea.

Related Tags:

 

Commentary

Summer Summer-y: The Summer Movies of 2014

Posted on August 31, 2014 at 3:46 pm

fault-in-our-stars-poster-largeA few concluding thoughts on the summer movies of 2014:

A good summer for food movies: “The Chef,” “The 100-Foot Journey,” and “The Trip to Italy” had some big-time actors but the real stars were the luscious meals. Special mention of the delicious French comedy “Le Chef,” starring Jean Reno, and “The Lunchbox” as well.

A bad summer for comedies: “22 Jump Street” was uneven, but at least it had some laughs. Can’t say the same for “Neighbors,” “Blended,” “Tammy,” “The Other Woman,” “A Million Ways to Die in the West,” or “Let’s Be Cops,” excruciating and un-funny wastes of time and talent.

A good summer for super-heroes: “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” and “Guardians of the Galaxy” were all we hoped for in summer comic book blockbusters. “Spider-Man 2” was pretty good, primarily due to the sizzling chemistry between leads Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone.

A good summer for Scarlett Johansson: She followed up last year’s prestige hit, “Her,” with brilliant work in an astonishing range of films, from the spooky “Under the Skin” to her witty performance in “Captain America.” She was even good in Luc Besson’s second-rate “Lucy.”Guardians of the Galaxy

A good summer for YA adaptations: “The Fault in Our Stars” was skillfully brought to screen, with “If I Stay” and “The Giver” solid runners-up.

A good summer for CGI: “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” was a new leap forward in the realism of the motion capture and special effects, especially the expressiveness of the characters. “Guardians of the Galaxy” had terrific CGI, especially Groot.

A bad summer for CGI: “Godzilla” was a disappointment.

I loved: “Boyhood” and “Life Itself”

I wanted to but did not love: “Jersey Boys,” “Magic in the Moonlight,” “Wish I Was Here”

I cried: “The Fault in Our Stars” and — yes — “How to Train Your Dragon 2”

Deserved better box office: “Edge of Tomorrow”

Got better box office than they deserved: “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” and “Transformers”

SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT

We’ve had quite a string of what I call Pogo bad guys. Remember when the comic strip character Pogo looked sadly at a polluted river and said, “We have met the enemy and he is us?” I’m not sure whether it is a lack of imagination in screenwriters or a reflection of the zeitgeist mistrust of institutions, but in films like “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” “The November Man,” and even “Let’s Be Cops,” the bad guys turned out to be inside the U.S. Government.

Related Tags:

 

Commentary Spoiler Alert Understanding Media and Pop Culture

“Let’s Be Cops” Could Have Been Not Terrible

Posted on August 30, 2014 at 11:35 am

Let's_Be_Cops_posterLet’s Be Cops” is a dumb movie that wants to be like “Lethal Weapon” or “The Other Guys,” a comedy action film about buddies with badges. It’s moderate box office returns are possibly in part because the unrest in Ferguson and news stories about police brutality made the timing bad for a cop comedy. The terrific Aisha Harris had an excellent piece on Slate about the film and how it missed the chance to take advantage of its premise for some sharper — and funnier — moments.

it’s interesting that the friend who sees each moment in which he somehow gets away with his fraud as the gateway to even bigger, and more dangerous (but fun!) hijinks, is white. In his own delusional world, pretending to be a cop is his path toward doing something with his life—on more than one occasion, Ryan explains to his friend, desperately, that he’s actually found a purpose in being a fake cop. Meanwhile, the friend who clearly wishes he wasn’t wrapped up in this mess is black. For him, the advantages that accompany being a cop—like the hot girl who is instantly turned on by the sight of your badge—don’t outweigh the serious jail time that awaits them once they’re found out. While the movie doesn’t interrogate the idea at all, Ryan is acting on the luxury he has as white male not to fear consequences in the same way that Justin does. Forget just impersonating a police officer—were the two of them to commit any crime in real life, Ryan would likely face a lighter sentence than Justin.

I thought about this in a scene where Ryan plays a prank on Justin by pretending to be a cop calling him over, with no clue that this would be a different experience for Justin than if it had been the other way around. Damon Wayans, Jr. even has one understated line making that point, but it is just glossed over. There is a point where movies go past living in a pleasant fantasy world that takes us away from our daily cares to a point where the disregard for what goes on in the world becomes a distraction.

Related Tags:

 

Commentary Race and Diversity Understanding Media and Pop Culture
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik