Why Are There Scenes in the Trailer That Aren’t In the Movie? Again!

Posted on July 16, 2015 at 1:48 pm

Both of the big nationwide releases this week have widely distributed trailers that include scenes that are not actually in the movie.  I’ve written about this before.  Sometimes the movie is still being edited as the trailer is being prepared.  Sometimes the trailer is edited to make edgier or more adult material tame enough to secure a “green band” for wider release.   “Red band” trailers are supposed to be shown only to audiences 17 and over, though online it is all but impossible to make that distinction.

But both “Ant-Man” and “Trainwreck” are missing scenes that are in the trailers and there does not seem to be any particular reason.  The “Ant-Man” trailer has Paul Rudd charmingly say that the name wasn’t his idea.  Not in the film.  The “Trainwreck” trailer seems to have as many lines that are not in the movie as those that are in.

Trailers used to be called “coming attractions.”  We know they’re going to give us the highlights and make the movie seem as appealing as possible.  But they should accurately represent what we are going to see.

Related Tags:

 

Understanding Media and Pop Culture
Comic-Con 2015 Panel on Fandom: The Next Generation

Comic-Con 2015 Panel on Fandom: The Next Generation

Posted on July 12, 2015 at 11:16 am

I was thrilled to be invited by Betsy Bozdech of Common Sense Media to appear on a panel discussion if and how to share our nerdy passions with our children. I was even more thrilled when I found out who would be on the panel with me: Jeffrey Brown, author of Darth Vader and Son, Jim McQuarrie of GeekDad, and none other than Clark Gregg, Agent Coulson himself!

Copyright Common Sense Media 2015
Copyright Common Sense Media 2015

We all dream of sharing our passions with our children. But it is important to be careful about it. Everyone on the panel had a story about sharing the wrong movie — or the right movie too soon — with a child who got upset, and feeling that we had “flunked parenting.” Young children will say what they think you want to hear and if it seems too important to you, they will tell you they like something when they really do not. Older children will say the opposite of what they think you want to hear; they will tell you they don’t like something when they really do. What matters is to let them develop their own nerdy attachments, the ones that they use to connect with their peers. Let them see you be passionate about something. If you want them to read, don’t tell them to read; let them see you read. If you want them to put down their devices, don’t tell them to put down their devices; put down your devices.

The best moment of the panel was when I mentioned Pokemon as a nerdy obsession kids love and adults generally do not, and McQuarrie said that his son had been a huge Pokemon fan, pointing to his now-adult son sitting in the audience. The entire room smiled at him and then, all at once, noticed that the young woman he had his arm around was dressed as…Pokemon!

Related Tags:

 

Understanding Media and Pop Culture
Vox on Makeover Movies

Vox on Makeover Movies

Posted on July 11, 2015 at 3:55 pm

In my book, The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies, there is a discussion of “makeover movies.”

Little girls and bigger ones see a lot of what I call “makeover movies:” in a crucial scene Our Heroine gets a new dress and hairstyle (or just takes off her glasses) and her life changes. Sometimes she transforms herself, as Ella does in “The Bells are Ringing” , causing her to have enormous conflicts and self-doubt. More often, she is transformed by someone else. Cinderella gets a dress to go to the ball, where the prince falls in love with her. Sleeping Beauty’s ballgown is so crucial that the fairies’ fight over its color literally leads the bad fairy to her hideaway. The modern counterparts are Eliza Doolittle, who, like Cinderella, goes to a ball in borrowed finery (and accent) and dazzles everyone there (“My Fair Lady” ) and “Gigi” who is actually groomed by her grandmother and great-aunt to be a very elegant prostitute, trained almost like a geisha in manners and skills for pleasing a man. Over and over, we see the heroines rewarded for being passive pleasers.

Transformation themes have been a central part of stories long before there were movies. The examples above were fairy tales before they were on screen. And girls and women are not the only ones who are transformed; superheroes all have origin stories that are a form of makeover, though they are changing to fantasy versions for themselves, and not to get positive attention from the opposite sex.

VOX has a nice commentary on makeover movies.

Related Tags:

 

Film History For Your Netflix Queue Gender and Diversity Understanding Media and Pop Culture
Inside “Inside Out” — Takes on Pixar’s Hit Movie About Feelings

Inside “Inside Out” — Takes on Pixar’s Hit Movie About Feelings

Posted on July 6, 2015 at 3:35 pm

“Inside Out” is not just one of the best movies of the year (animated and live action). It is also one of the most psychologically profound and astute films about emotions and the mind ever made. It set the all-time box office opening weekend record for a non-series film and reached number one at the box office this week, out-doing two huge holiday weekend releases, “Terminator Genisys” and “Magic Mike XXL.”

Copyright 2015  Pixar
Copyright 2015 Pixar

And it has provoked some exceptionally thoughtful responses from movie critics and specialists in child development. My friend Jen Chaney wrote one for The Dissolve, tying the movie’s themes to other Pixar films that touch on the bittersweetness of the end of childhood, but explaining how this film takes it to a new depth.

According to Inside Out, the middle-school-girl brain is simultaneously orderly yet fragile, crowded with highly charged voices (some previously heard on NBC sitcoms, The Daily Show, and/or Saturday Night Live), and aesthetically similar to a pinball machine, a Lite-Brite, and multiple levels of Candy Crush. It’s rare in a children’s film—or for that matter, any film—to see elements of the human nervous system rendered with such exquisite care and unmitigated glee.

But the film’s point of view is more important than its plot, or its sophisticated view of the machinations behind Riley’s meltdown. For the first time, a Pixar film is confronting how much it hurts when a child realizes her childhood will end—while it’s still ending. It literally gets inside her head, then bluntly announces that being a kid hurts because it doesn’t last. That feels refreshingly candid, even for Pixar.

Dacher Keltner and Paul Ekmanhe, scientists who consulted on the film wrote about their experience for the New York Times.

he movie’s portrayal of sadness successfully dramatizes two central insights from the science of emotion.

First, emotions organize — rather than disrupt — rational thinking. Traditionally, in the history of Western thought, the prevailing view has been that emotions are enemies of rationality and disruptive of cooperative social relations….Second, emotions organize — rather than disrupt — our social lives. Studies have found, for example, that emotions structure (not just color) such disparate social interactions as attachment between parents and children, sibling conflicts, flirtations between young courters and negotiations between rivals.

They would have preferred that Sadness have a less dreary affect. And they note that they recommended many more emotions, but Pixar explained that they could not handle that many characters.

Dan Kois wrote more as a parent than a critic for Slate.

he emotional messages of most entertainment for kids are pretty relentlessly positive: Love your family, stay true to yourself, keep positive, never give in to despair. As the research of Stanford’s Jeanne Tsai has shown, one of the emotions that Americans in particular privilege is joy—excited pleasure. Children see around them, in books and movies and advertisements, exemplars of delight at growing up. “That makes it harder to grapple with sadness,” University of California, Berkeley psychology professor Dacher Keltner told me. “It’s a vacuum in our culture.”

But, points out Keltner, who consulted with Pixar’s Pete Docter on the film, sadness is a powerful tool, a trigger that sends kids back to their parents for comfort and connection. “You gotta hang on to that sadness,” he told me, because in the tumult of early adolescence, it’s the thing that can bring parent and child back together.

Over at Zero to Three, Claire Lerner echoes the importance of teaching kids to recognize their feelings and acknowledging them, pointing out the applicability of the insights in the film even to the youngest children.

Major kudos are due Pixar and Disney for elevating the importance of the emotional lives of children and providing a creative vehicle for helping kids learn to understand and manage their complex emotions. Most importantly, the film reminds parents that having a happy child does not mean your child must always be happy.

Young children are deeply feeling beings. Starting in the earliest months of life, well before they can use words to express themselves, babies have the capacity to experience peaks of joy, excitement, and elation. They also feel fear, grief, sadness, hopelessness, and anger—emotions that many adults understandably find it hard to believe that such young children can experience. But just as Riley in the film needs her parents to hear and empathize with her difficult feelings of pain and loss—which helps her move on in positive ways—so do babies and toddlers.

She concludes with some very practical recommendations for parents.

And be sure to listen to co-writer/director Pete Docter, who spoke about what was behind the film and the crucial moment that changed everything in an interview with “Fresh Air’s” Terry Gross.

Related Tags:

 

Critics Parenting Understanding Media and Pop Culture
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik