Interview: George Nolfi of ‘The Adjustment Bureau’

Posted on March 2, 2011 at 8:00 am

“The Adjustment Bureau” is the first great film of 2011, a big and hugely entertaining film that takes on big ideas — love, free will, destiny, God, and the meaning of life. I was lucky enough to speak with writer and first-time director George Nolfi about being inspired by a short story from Philip K. Dick.adjustment-bureau-poster-3.jpg
The movie is very different from “Adjustment Team,” the original story by Philip K. Dick. How did you approach adapting it for the screen?
The short story is just that, short. And it has a character at the center of it who is explicitly an everyman and so there isn’t much of a character to play there. It was going to need some adaptation one way or another. I was interested in a different thing than Philip K. Dick was. The story can be read from one angle was “Is this real or is this not real?” I wanted it to be — this thing happens and it spins the guy’s whole life on its head and all of his conceptions about the laws of physics and the universe are turned upside down. And he has to accept it because the evidence is just so overwhelming. What does that do to a person?
When my producing partner brought me the short story, I thought, what a great conception for a movie, the idea that fate is a group of people subtly pushing you back on plan. He also said, “You could do this as a love story. Your lead falls in love for the first time in his life and the adjuster comes along and says, ‘Sorry, there’s been a mistake. You weren’t even supposed to meet her.'” For whatever reason, my reaction to that was, “I think I know how to write that.” I didn’t know what I was going to put in the script but I thought the blending of genres would be fascinating and it would get me into territories of these much larger questions that every great system of thought — philosophical, literary, science-fiction, theological — this story would allow me to get there. There are not many stories that make big movies that take you to those questions.
It is unusual for a big-time movie with big-time movies stars to take on questions of life and fate and meaning and free will. I love the fact that it wasn’t focus-grouped away from engaging on those issues.
I optioned the rights and controlled them for six or seven years. I gave the script to Matt Damon and got some thoughts from him about his character. Neither of us thought his character was fully developed yet. I rewrote it to give his character more layers and more interesting things for him to play. And he said yes and we got it financed outside the studio system, from a group called MRC. When we then went to the studios we were able to say, “We have this movie and we have this movie star” and give them a fully-formed movie, so you don’t have this automatic development process where it’s nobody’s fault but things tend to get homogenized.
And Universal was really supportive, right from the beginning. They were on board with the notion of trying something that was really reaching. They were just like — let’s go for it. They thought people would leave the theater feeling satisfied even though we were blending genres. I had no interference while I was making the movie. In post-production they had just a few thoughts which in the Hollywood scheme of things would be considered minuscule. They had thoughts about the music but that was temp music anyway. I didn’t think the original ending worked and they agreed. So it was good people we were in business with and we were all pulling the same way. They were completely supportive of what we were trying to do, and so was Matt.
As a screenwriter, you’ve worked with directors but this is the first time you have directed. What did you learn from the directors you’ve observed?
I was on the set for all the movies I am credited on. And for “Oceans 12,” I knew I was basically going to be there the whole time. I said to Steven Soderbergh, “I’m interested in being director, are you cool with my occasionally ask you why you’re doing what you’re doing?” And he was extremely gracious to explain some of his thought processes about why he was choosing certain shots and so on. But the single biggest piece of advice he gave me that really stuck with me was, “In a perfect world you want to choose your shots and assemble to the movie so that the sound could go out and people could still follow the story.” That’s telling a story through pictures.
Clearly you listened to him! For a writer turned director, this is a very visual film. The effects are very significant and essential to the narrative.
As a writer making the leap to directing the first time, it was very important to me to make a film that was visually significant, to use visuals and music and sound as well as the performances of the cast to tell the story — those are the things you don’t have as a writer. I really wanted to do visual story-telling. I write scripts that are very visual but you can’t know until you try it whether it would come easily to me as a director, but I loved it.
I liked the idea that the Adjusters could do a lot of things but in a way the humans adjusted their options, too. They were nudging each other.
Thematically, I had this idea that the Chairman was limiting the Bureau in all kinds of different ways. That’s too many ripples so you have to go to a higher authority. Or you can’t go through that door unless you are wearing a hat. Or it’s raining out and water kind of blocks our ability. Those are foreshadowing the way that the Chairman will turn out to be supportive of free will.
And of love! It’s a very romantic movie.
I hope so! I hope you experienced it that way. I think it is.
And it is very spiritual, as well.
I wasn’t trying to make a religious film per se, but the most comprehensive attempts to make sense of the world are theological. In terms of fate and free will, that’s the oldest question human beings struggle with. It’s there in Gilgamesh and ancient Greece. Is it fate or do we have choices? There’s a reason for that. Human beings are questioning animals and we want to understand our existence.
Looked at in much less grand terms, most people have some sense that the person they turned out to be, the job they have, their moral code, their interests, their religion, were shaped by what country they were born in, what neighborhood they were born into, their family, their friends, their schools, their chance encounters have put them on a path. Even things considered more deeply personal choices like who your spouse is — you were introduced by friends or met at a wedding or you had mutual interests or whatever it is. So we have this sense that the course of our life is shaped by outside forces, whether a divine hand or your surrounding influences. But we also experience our lives as a series of choices. No religion has successfully answered that. We did an inter-faith screening with an audience of followers of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and we had a discussion with experts in all all three. They discussed faith and free will and pointed out to the audience that the importance of free will was found in all of them. They have to, in order to make sense of existence.

Related Tags:


Behind the Scenes Directors Interview Science-Fiction Spiritual films Writers

4 Replies to “Interview: George Nolfi of ‘The Adjustment Bureau’”

  1. From what I read, this looks like a film that I would be interested in seeing. It is nice to see a new filmmaker come onto the scene. I am hopeful that maybe it will be the beginning of films that present a good quality story. Are there any mainstream actors in the film ? Will it be on limited release ?

  2. The REAL MEANING! There are two stories of creation in Genesis. One is given of men created in the plural sense,and the second the creation of a secret place called Eden with only one man called Adam to begin with.

    Simply put, after Cain slays Abel, God removes them from Eden to stop them from further access to the “fruit of the two trees” with a flaming sworded angel guarding the path.

    Cain married a woman and founded an entire city given his long lifespan, which God began to reduce in humanity at various intervals of time, as stated in the bible.

    These sons and women of men, were hybrids, for lack of a better term,  derived from some of the “ancient aliens”. The ones we are finding out about more and more today, thru archeology, ruins and ancient transcripts translations found across all nations and ancient civilizations. Ones who worshipped their own alien gods.

    These are the people that called on God for salvation and refuge, see Isaiah 63-65, and vowed to set aside their alien gods in exchange for life and protection thru God. Especially Isaiah 63:19 We have long being like those whom you do not rule, like those not called by your name.

    These are the men that existed outside of paradise in times given like 2 Esdras 10:45. 3000 years of time before ANY OFFERING was offered in it.

    Now as end times approach, we realize how far we are straying from the path of our salvation and redemption as defined in narrow terms by God. Example, our soul, the soul of man rationalizes the “common sense” of same sex unions and argues the right to even use the biblical name and ritual blessings of marriage, a concept defined and given to us by God in exchange for His protection and His way.

    (Note: I am not judging these people, I know some wonderful people, it’s just I HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE GOD by teaching my children its acceptable to redefine God’s parameters of marriage to suit our mortal human liking.) Civil union is man made and excellent for contractual and legal reasons, it suits it’s purpose. Marriage is God defined and it’s ritual is for those who obey God’s definitions.

    If you have read all of 2 Esdras, then you will understand  the angel Uriel explanation of the three parts within us, the soul of man, the spirit, and in the middle is the mind which is the visual interpreter. The mind is the holographic dream machine, the trickster, or the inner eye that enables the spirit within us to grow and change. (2 Esdras 5:22).

    Angel Uriel explains we have to earn our spiritual passage to leave earth and join God in His new world. This lifetime of mortality is a CONTEST for our soul of man to grow because it is limited (2Esdras 4), and we must enlarge our spirit through understanding first,  and this understanding comes thru the mind which acts as interpreter.
    2Esdras 7:14 ..unless the living pass thru the difficult and futile experiences, they can never receive those things that have been reserved for them.
    2Esdras 7:50 For this reason the Most High has made not one world but two.
    2Esdras 7 57 127 this is the significance of the contest that all who are born on earth shall wage.

    This movie theme explores the concept of DIVINE INTERVENTION thru ‘ANGELS’ – not helpful ones but forceful men in black suits who like biblical angels also admit they do not know God’s plan in it’s entirety.

    It’s disgusting in that it also ARGUES:

    1) the SOUL OF MAN is forced to accept divine intervention. (The strange office scene with mind altering wands)
    2) Exploiting the concept of undying love, the soul of man is entitled free will to redefine eternal happiness, and that if only we try hard enough God will relent in giving us an eternal Earth where we can incorporate our own chosen version of eternal happiness.

    Take note there is also only ONE suited angel who decides to help man force God to change His plan.

    Yet God has already given this freedom, and in Isaiah 65:17 God creates a new heaven and earth Reserved for those who accepted His challenge of spiritual growth and reform in the mortal Life of flesh,  and in Isaiah 66:24 agrees the soul of man shall continue, their worm shall not die. It’s just those who did not want to accept His enlightenment will not be relocated to His new heaven and earth.

    The freedom of choice was always… and has always been ours. It’s just we must know that this earth will be destroyed, the sun and the moon humbled, read 2 Esdras and Revelations. And As the Spirit never dies, and we must choose in what world we would like our spirit to pursue in.

    2Esdras 7:21 The Lord strictly commanded those who came into the world when they came, what they should do to live, and what they should observe to avoid punishment.

    For those of us who have forgotten this instruction during our ‘flight/journey’ over into this earth to be born mortal (who has not dreamt of an exciting airplane ride full of anticipation) and once here we can CHOOSE to be reminded of God’s word by the brave few who attempt to act as ambassadors for God.

    This movie is reprehensible for trying to trick ignorant people into believing God is forceful and only concerned  with reforming us to His liking regardless of our hearts desire. That God will relent into incorporating our desires if only we demand it. And lastly to sympathize and side with the one dark lonely angel who will help give man what his heart desires.

    Quite shocking, but no more shocking than some of our dreams can be as the trickster of our mind attempts to offer persuasion and bring enlightenment or even confusion.

Comments are closed.

THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik