The Debt

Posted on August 30, 2011 at 6:04 pm

A+
Lowest Recommended Age: Adult
MPAA Rating: Rated R for some violence and language
Profanity: Some strong and offensive language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking, smoking, drugs
Violence/ Scariness: Characters in peril, injured, and killed, some graphic images, references to Holocaust atrocities
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: August 31, 2011
Date Released to DVD: December 6, 2011
Amazon.com ASIN: B003Y5H4Y8

Stories are linear.  Part of what gives them their power is that we jettison the details that are distracting or unimportant.  But real life is messy.  That may not be as compelling, but is honest.  As we are told in “The Man Who Shots Liberty Valance,” “When the truth becomes legend, print the legend.”  And sometimes the legend becomes the truth.

That is the story of “The Debt.”  It begins in 1997, when a woman is celebrating the publication of her book, which tells the story of her parents’ daring capture of a Nazi war criminal named Vogel in East Germany three decades before.  Her parents, now divorced, are Rachel Singer (Helen Mirren) and Stephan Gold (Tom Wilkenson).  Rachel still has a scar on her cheek from the prisoner’s attack on her when he tried to escape.  She shot him to keep him from getting away.

Then we go back to the 1960’s, when Rachel (Jessica Chastain) passes through the Berlin Wall on her first assignment as a Mossad agent.  The man they are looking for was responsible for atrocities that were a grotesque version of medical experiments during the war.  Now he is a gynecologist under the name Bernhardt (the Danish actor Jesper Christensen), and Rachel is assigned to visit him as a patient, posing as the wife of another agent, David Peretz (Sam Worthington), under the direction of their leader, Stephan (Marton Csokas). The first time through, we saw the story they told.  Now we see what really happened, and then we will see how the three of them, in their 60’s, finish the story.

It is a tense thriller with some action and a lot of suspense, especially the war of nerves as Bernhardt and the three young agents are stuck in a grimy apartment for days, essentially prisoners of each other.  The young agents are rattled by Vogel’s coolness and manipulation.  And then, decades later, their story starts to unravel and they have to finish what they started.

The movie works very well as a thriller that benefits from some ambitious aspirations and superb performances from Christensen, Wilkenson, and Mirren.  But it spins out of control in the last 20 minutes, sacrificing story for action and losing much of its gritty momentum.

 

 

(more…)

Related Tags:

 

Drama Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Remake Spies War

Interview: John Madden of ‘The Debt’

Posted on August 30, 2011 at 8:00 am

John Madden, director of “Shakespeare in Love” and “Proof,” came to Washington, D.C. to talk about his newest film, “The Debt.”  It is a remake of an Israeli film about three Mossad agents who are revered as heroes for capturing a Nazi war criminal, who was then killed trying to escape.  The film moves back and forth in time between the capture in the 1960’s and 1997, when a book about it, written by the daughter of two of the agents, is published.  We spoke about the challenge of casting a villain,

How did you become involved in a remake of an Israeli film?

An agent called Ari Emanuel, the brother of Rahm represents Matthew Vaughn and the producer of the original film.  Because it was in Hebrew it did not get a release anywhere else, but they thought it was an interesting project to reconsider or adapt for a wider audience.  So Matthew wrote a script that was faithful to the original story but it was structurally a little different.  The original film cross-cuts more between the two time frames.  He sent it to me, so the first way I came across the material in that form.  I thought it a very compelling and interesting story which I immediately wanted to unravel.  I did watch the original film — it’s the raw material and I wanted to honor that.  But I hoped it would not be very good!  It would be easier.  But it was good, very arresting.  It didn’t daunt me or arrest me.  It excited me because I could see it was a very powerful piece.  We inevitably developed the story in different ways, with different emphasis.  The material is sufficiently strong and charged and complex that as a director you need to find your own way through it.

I’m always interested in what goes into casting the villain, especially in this film where you have an actor who is unknown in the US and who gives a spectacular performance.

Jesper Christensen plays the villain.  He’s Danish and fantastically highly regarded and respected actor with a very long list of stage and movie credits.  I didn’t want an audience to be able to say immediately, “Oh, here’s the villain.”  The preoccupations of the story is about moral responsibility.  I didn’t want the ground to be completely solid.  One of the things you wonder as the Navy Seals must have wondered as they came into the compound in Abbottabad not knowing if the person there was Bin Laden.  You do find yourself thinking even once he’s in captivity, “Have they got the right guy?”  He is clever enough to exploit the weaknesses in the scenario to his own advantage.  A Nazi doctor is about the apotheosis of villainy in a certain kind of cinematic literature and that’s a trap, a danger of two-dimensionality, and Peter  Straughan and I were very conscious of not wanting this character to cooperate with the script, not wanting him to be this monstrous presence.  He does say things that are monstrous, but even that you have to contextualize that he’s a man fighting for his life and looking for any advantage.  He can be quite charming when he says he would prefer to be fed by Rachel, who had, he says, the makings of a nurse in another life.  There’s something beguiling in that sort of wisdom and you find yourself agreeing with him when he says that.

We were under a lot of pressure to change the title at one point.  It’s somewhat of a negative signifier in this modern age though I always thought it was a marvelous title.  In the interest of collaboration, I said, “Well, if we can come up with another one,” and one we thought of was “Another Life.”  He is a man who makes another life for himself, or tries to.  Watch for the moment when he starts speaking in English.  And there’s Rachel, looking out behind sunglasses which are supposed to protect her eyes from the sun but she’s looking out at a life she should never have had, that is a false life, that seemed a provocative and interesting idea.

It is very Israeli to have such an international cast.  Israel is even more of a melting pot than the US.

I’m slightly conscious of the fact that other than the Israeli actors, the principals are not by in large Jewish.  That wasn’t by intent.  But the internationality of the cast gave me a kind of latitude.  I don’t think anyone watching the film would know where Jessica Chastain or Marton Csokas was from.  He’s actually half Hungarian.  And Jesper is a Dane who blessedly is completely fluent in German and English.

Did you have the actors who played the younger versions of the characters work with the actors who played their older selves?

Only Helen and Jessica.  That symbiosis is necessary for the story and I set higher standards of physical affinity.  I wanted Jessica to be an unknown but she’s less of an unknown now!  I looked at the photos of the men side by side.  But David is almost unrecognizable to himself, one of those situations where you might say, “I saw him the other day and you wouldn’t recognize him.”  So resemblance was less important.

It is a story about stories, isn’t it?

There’s a lot of thematic richness in the film.  It’s about a need for heroes and the way we mythologized them.  This country’s whole political discourse and movie culture is based on the idea of the hero. It’s a very potent idea to deconstruct.  And we all mythologize our own histories with an unconscious editing of our own behavior.  You know you’ve got a good story when it starts talking back to you and revealing things that you haven’t foreseen.  It’s the daughter’s unawareness, the way she is enveloped in a lie — the mother has to do something truly heroic, to immolate herself in order to release her daughter from the contamination of the lie.

 

 

 

Related Tags:

 

Directors Interview
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik