I am thrilled that I have been invited to be one of the correspondents for Roger Ebert’s new show, “Ebert Presents At the Movies.” With AP’s Christy Lemire and the 24-year-old Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of MUBI.com as co-hosts and Roger and his wife Chaz producing, it is sure to be informative, provocative, and illuminating viewing for anyone who cares about movies. The show will also feature Kim Morgan of Sunset Gun, who also writes essays for MSN Movies, and authors and runs MSN’s daily film blog, the Hitlist, my friend Omar Moore of Popcorn Reel and more. It is a great honor to be included. Stay tuned for updates about the show!
I am honored to be mentioned in Roger Ebert’s outstanding op-ed about the MPAA ratings, and thrilled with his support for what I do. Last week, on appeal, the MPAA lowered the rating of “Blue Valentine,” a searing portrait of a deteriorating marriage, to an R. Its explicit sexual material had given it an NC-17, which meant that many newspapers would not accept ads and many theaters would not show it.
Ebert says:
The MPAA should have changed its standards long ago, taking into account the context and tone of a movie instead of holding fast to rigid checklists….It’s time to get pragmatic about this. The current ratings system is useful primarily for the parents of small children who are concerned that images or situations may be disturbing for young minds. They know a G film is harmless and a PG almost certainly is, and a PG-13 may or may not be. It’s an open secret that some naturally PG movies have an element or two thrown in to earn a PG-13, so teenagers aren’t scared off. That’s not a step forward.
Obviously, what parents really want is an evaluation, exactly what Mr. Valenti said the MPAA could not provide. When they’re informed that a PG-13 contains “language, some intense situations and smoking,” what have they learned? On the Internet, useful guides to content are everywhere. Critics like Nell Minow, the “Movie Mom,” write intelligently for parents about the content and context of films.
Some suggestions for the movie-lovers in your life (and face it, that includes everyone)!
DVDs
For the movie historian: Three sensational documentaries from Disney and about Disney.
Walt & El Grupo is a fascinating look at one of the turning points in the early days of the Disney company. The country was on the brink of WWII and the US government asked Walt Disney to be a cultural ambassador to South America. What Disney and his top artists (who referred to themselves as “El Grupo”) saw there was revelatory. The trip was an adventure in itself, but what is breathtaking is the chance to see the first glimpses of the images that would define the studio’s visual style for the next decade and beyond.
The Boys: The Sherman Brothers’ Story is the story of the brothers behind some of Disney’s most beloved songs, from “Supercalifragilisticexpialidocous” to “Chim Chim Chir-ee,” “I Wanna Be Like You,” and even “It’s a Small World” and “The Tiki Tiki Tiki Room.” There was loss and sadness behind the cheery songs, and the movie is a frank but sympathetic and very touching look at the partnership with enjoyable contributions from some of the stars who worked with the brothers over the years.
Waking Sleeping Beauty After a series of undisputed classics, Disney animation had lost its way with a series of expensive but forgettable duds, putting the entire corporation at risk. And then, in one of the most extraordinary corporate turn-arounds of all time, the studio re-vitalized the business at its core, captivating audiences with “The Little Mermaid” and “Aladdin” and then the record-breaking blockbuster “The Lion King.” Its drama is as gripping and its characters as endearing as the films it produced; the story behind the stories is an inspiring story about business, about art, about dreams, and about life.
ESPN Films 30 for 30 Gift Set Collection, Volume 1. The 30th anniversary of the sports channel featured 30 films about sports from 30 top directors. The first six are now available in this box set: Kings Ransom directed by Peter Berg, The Band That Wouldn’t Die directed by Academy Award-winner Barry Levinson, Muhammad & Larry by Academy Award-nominee Albert Maysles and Bradley Kaplan, The U by Billy Corben, Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. the New York Knicks by Peabody Award-winner director Dan Klores, No Crossover: The Trial of Allen Iverson directed by Academy Award-nominee Steve James, Straight Outta L.A. directed by Ice Cube and June 17th, 1994 by Academy Award-nominee Brett Morgen.
For anyone and everyone:
Give that new Blu-Ray player a test drive with the truly spectacular new edition of Fantasia/Fantasia 2000. It jumps off the screen with its glorious color and crystal-clear sound and it includes lots of great background and historical information plus the legendary “Destino,” designed by Salvador Dali and completed more than half a century later based on his plans. It’s available for a very limited time, so grab it now.
BOOKS
For the film buff who reads:
My Year of Flops: The A.V. Club Presents One Man’s Journey Deep into the Heart of Cinematic Failure is a rollicking romp through the many different categories of awful, from so-bad-it’s good to downright unwatchable. Whether you read for a twinge of schadenfreude-ish pleasure in knowing you will never have to suffer through big budget train wrecks like “Battlefield Earth” to justifiably unknown oddities like Johnny Cash’s tribute to Jesus, “Gospel Road” or to come up with some cinematic dreck for your Netflix queue, this is a great read.
Designs on Film: A Century of Hollywood Art Direction is the story of the people we know call production designers, the people responsible for making sure that every detail you see on screen, whether a meticulous re-creation of an historical site or the depiction of a wholly-imagined fantasy setting helps to tell the story. The reason these fantastically creative and hardworking miracle-workers are unsung is that they don’t want you to look at the screen and say, “Wow! That is an interesting futuristic car!” They want you to accept their vision so completely that you don’t realize what you are noticing. This book gives you what the movies do not — a chance to revel in the artistry of the creative geniuses who took the written words “yellow brick road” and “blade runner” and “chariot race” and “Rosemary’s baby” and Howard Roark’s blueprints” and made them come alive for millions of people.
Fifth Avenue, 5 A.M: Audrey Hepburn and Breakfast at Tiffany’s tells the story of the making of the movie based on Truman Capote’s novella Holly Golightly, glamorous on the outside, struggling between her heart and her wallet on the inside. It’s also the story of its era and its influence on that era. If you’ve always wanted the perfect LBD, this is for you.
Hail, Hail, Euphoria!: Presenting the Marx Brothers in Duck Soup, the Greatest War Movie Ever Made is humorist Roy Blount, Jr.’s appreciation of one of the most deliriously delightful movies ever made, Duck Soup. Remember, this is the movie that made Woody Allen decide life was worth living in Hannah and Her Sisters. Blount tells us how it was made and why it was not appreciated as a classic for almost 30 more years. A lot of fun to read, this is witty and insightful and a good reminder to sit down and Hail Freedonia!
The Elephant to Hollywood is the autobiography of one of the most disarmingly charming actors in movies, Michael Caine. Filled with anecdotes about his encounters, the book benefits from an endearing humility as Caine describes his adjustment to working as a character actor instead of a leading man, recognizing that his love for his art was more important than his pride. (This, of course, led to acclaim and an Oscar.) This is also a rags to riches, follow your dream saga as gripping as any feature film, and a tender love story as well.
Best Film?: “The Social Network”
Best Director: David Fincher, “The Social Network”
Best Actor: Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech”
Best Actress: Jennifer Lawrence, “Winter’s Bone”
Best Supporting Actor: Christian Bale, “The Fighter”
Best Supporting Actress: Melissa Leo, “The Fighter”
Best Adapted Screenplay: “The Social Network”
Best Original Screenplay: “Inception”
Best Animated Feature: “Toy Story 3“
Best Documentary: “Exit Through the Gift Shop”
Best Foreign Language Film: “Biutiful”
Best Art Direction: “Inception”
Best Cinematography: “Inception”
Best Score: “Inception”
Best Acting Ensemble: “The Town”
Many thanks to my dear friends Brandon Fibbs, Dustin Putman, Patrick Jennings, and our fearless leader Tim Gordon for making this a pleasure.
Ebert on O’Hehir’s ‘Conspiracy Theory’ About the Christian Director of ‘Secretariat’
Posted on October 8, 2010 at 7:36 am
Roger Ebert has a superb rebuttal to Andrew O’Hehir’s review of “Secretariat” in Salon. Ebert is careful to say that he respects O’Hehir but that this review goes far beyond the usual disagreements about taste and aesthetics. O’Hehir read into the film a political and religious agenda that cannot be supported, simply because the director is a Christian.
Andrew O’Hehir of Salon is a critic I admire, but he has nevertheless written a review of “Secretariat” so bizarre I cannot allow it to pass unnoticed. I don’t find anywhere in “Secretariat” the ideology he discovers there. In its reasoning, his review resembles a fevered conspiracy theory.
O’Hehir criticizes the film for omitting other events of the era though an important plot element concerns the main character’s support for her daughter’s protest of the Vietnam War and a theme of the film is her struggle against the sexism of the time. He actually calls the film “a work of creepy, half-hilarious master-race propaganda almost worthy of Leni Riefenstahl” and brings in references not just to Nazis but to the Klu Klux Klan and to the Tea Party and Glenn Beck.
It’s bad enough to criticize a movie for failing to address every single issue of its era (even if that were possible in a two-hour time slot, it would bury the narrative). It is preposterous to criticize the movie for giving an “evil” name to the rival horse when that was the actual horse’s name. It is offensive to attribute malevolent intentions to a film because the director is Christian. And it is even more offensive to claim that values like dedication and the pursuit of excellence are exclusive to any one religion or political party.
Ebert writes:
O’Hehir mentions that Randall Wallace, who directed the film, “is one of mainstream Hollywood’s few prominent Christians, and has spoken openly about his faith and his desire to make movies that appeal to ‘people with middle-American values’.” To which I respond: I am a person with middle-American values, and the film appealed to me. This news just in: There are probably more liberals with middle-American values than conservatives, especially if your idea of middle-American values overlaps with the Beatitudes, as mine does.
NOTE: O’Hehir has responded to Ebert, saying that “my review of the film was willfully hyperbolic, even outrageous, in hopes of getting people to look at a formulaic Disney sports movie through fresh eyes.” Because there is no easy way to link to his response directly and I believe he makes some good points, I am going to include the full text of his post and Ebert’s reply here: