One Battle After Another

One Battle After Another

Posted on September 25, 2025 at 5:03 pm

A-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for pervasive language, violence, sexual content, and drug use
Profanity: Constant very strong, bigoted, and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking and drugs
Violence/ Scariness: Characters in peril, some injured and killed, graphic and disturbing images, guns and bombs
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie, racist characters
Copyright 2025 Warner Brothers

Writer/director Paul Thomas Anderson (“Boogie Nights,” “Magnolia,” “The Phantom Thread”) has taken a novel written 35 years ago by an author often described as “unfilmable” and turned it into a vital, provocative, and disturbingly (in a good way) of-the-moment two hour and forty minute film that seems to go by in half the time. The film is a grand epic anchored by three Oscar-winners bringing their A game. It balances action, politics, metaphor, and satire, with heightened characters who are larger than life but still feel real and a knockout, urgently percussive score from Johnny Greenwood. There is also humor, some slapstick, though not handled quite as deftly.

While much of the story is original, like Thomas Pynchon’s 1990 book, Vineland, the story is about a couple who were in a militant activist group, here called the French 75. The couple is identified by the authorities just after their child was born. The woman went into the witness protection program and the man and the baby got new identities and were relocated by French 75.

Elements of the story evoke the unrest of the 1960s, when the most extreme activists protesting the Vietnam War and racial injustice broke the law, even becoming violent. The Weather Underground’s name was inspired by the Bob Dylan line that “You don’t have to be a weather man to know which way the wind blows.”Weather Underground’s Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert served more than 20 years in maximum-security prisons for their roles in a 1981 Brink’s robbery in upstate New York, in which a guard and two police officers were killed while Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers were on the run from the authorities (partly inspiring the film “Running on Empty”).

French 75 is a Weather Underground-inspired group, but their attacks are even more militaristic and violent. Anderson’s script is very loosely based on the book and substitutes more timely issues and attitudes. While, like the group in the Pynchon book they have broadly anti-capitalist, anti-oppression views, we meet them as they are about to raid a US immigration center on the Mexican border.

The character who will be called Bob for most of the film (Leonardo DiCaprio) is in charge of explosives. Perfidia (Teyana Taylor) is one of the leaders, with a fierce, aggressive attitude and a lot of guns. The soldier in charge of the center is Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn in an incendiary performance, one of his best in years. Just watch the way he walks, the heft of his shoulders. Perfidia confronts him in a scene charged with highly sexualized power dynamics. He is humiliated and enthralled.

French 75 operatives zip tie the hands of the military and unlock the cages filled with rows of cots with people shivering under silvery Mylar blankets, one of innumerable striking images from cinematographer Michael Bauman. The raiders lead the immigrants into a truck and take them across the border into the US.

Perfidia is passionate about the issues and perhaps even more by the excitement and adrenaline of their raids. Bob, a bit shy and nerdy, shows her how he builds the explosives and she finds it thrilling. Soon they are a couple. Meanwhile, Lockjaw is obsessed with her. When she is captured, he says he will help her if she is nice to him. That means naming names of French 75 members and it means sex.

Perfidia has a baby, but soon leaves the infant with Bob and disappears. Sixteen years later, the couple and the baby are hiding out. No one knows where Perfidia is; she ran away from witness protection. The father and daughter, now called Bob and Willa (an outstanding debut by Chase Infiniti), are living quietly in a small Colorado town.

Lockjaw, still in the army and still deeply conflicted, wants to find Willa to determine if he is her father, and if so, to eliminate her. Perfidia is Black and Lockjaw, like Bob, is white. Lockjaw is desperate to join an elite club of the ruling class, which accepts only members who are “homegrown” (white, American-born, and gentile, with no ties to anyone who is not). If Willa is his daughter, he will not be eligible for membership. He finds out where Bob and Willa are hiding and fabricates a reason to be deployed to the area, arriving with a platoon of heavily armed soldiers.

Willa is frustrated by Bob’s constant use of marijuana and alcohol and by what she sees as his paranoia and overly strict rules. She goes to a school party with friends and is captured. Bob, with the help of Willa’s martial arts teacher, known as Sensei (Benicio Del Toro), goes after her, still wearing the ratty bathrobe he was wearing as he waited for her at home, smoking weed and watching “Battle of Algiers.” He has a special gizmo that French 75 gave him to help find her 16 years earlier, but it has been a while and he has abused many substances, so he cannot quite remember the passwords he needs to get help from the underground network or find a place to charge his phone. (The humor of this situation wears thin.)

We go back and forth from the military interrogations (even the bravest crumble when their families are at risk) to exceptionally well-designed, very exciting various efforts to capture and rescue Willa and her attempted escapes. There are fascinating characters along the way, including weed-growing nuns, the “homegrown” cabal, and a Native American tracker/hitman.

There will be a lot of conversations about this film, and a lot of arguments about how to unpack it. Anderson has enough respect for the audience not to make it easy and enough pure talent to keep us enthralled enough to try to parse it. While there are some exaggeratedly blatant villains in the film, the more important characters are the conflicted Lockjaw and the ineffectual Bob. The best clue is with the title, reminding us, again, that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

Parents should know that this movie includes peril and violence with characters injured and killed and graphic and disturbing images. guns, bombs, militant and military activity, guns and bombs. Characters smoke, drink, and use drugs and very strong and crude language. Characters are bigoted and use offensive terms.

Family discussion: How have things changed since the book that inspired this movie was written? Is Bob a good father?

If you like this, try: “White Noise”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Based on a book Comedy Drama movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Politics Satire
London Calling

London Calling

Posted on September 18, 2025 at 5:08 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong/bloody violence, language throughout, drug use and some sexual content
Profanity: Constant strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol, drug dealing
Violence/ Scariness: Character is an assassin, constant violence with many characters injured and killed, graphic bloody disturbing images, murder played for comedy
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: September 19, 2025
Copyright 2025 Quiver

Like its handsome anti-hero, this movie sometimes misfires, but it is easy on the eyes.

Josh Duhamel, always excellent, plays Tommy Ward, a hitman for some British gangsters. He’s reached that age when he should have his eyes checked, but he is too stubborn and perhaps too vain, so he just squints a bit more when he points his gun. In the opening scene, at a masquerade ball, he is directed to kill a guy in a horse mask. Because of his poor vision, he mistakenly kills someone in a donkey mask. This sets the dark comic tone for the film, but it doesn’t have the unabashed, slightly sociopathic brio of “Pulp Fiction,” so if a lethal “oops” doesn’t strike your funny bone, this film may not be for you.

To make it worse, the man Tommy killed is a distant relative of the crime boss, Freddy Darby (Aiden Gillan), who is known, as we are repeatedly told, for taking family very seriously. So after a quick farewell to his young son, now living with his ex-wife and her new husband, Tommy escapes to Los Angeles, as far from London as he can.

Some time later, we see Tommy driving a beater car and working for an LA crime boss named Benson (Rick Hoffman). Freddy discovers where Tommy is and comes after him. The only way for Tommy to get away is to train Benson’s doughy, LARP-ing teenage son in the ways of the assassin.

That whole tough guy forced to spend time with LARP kid thing was handled much better in “Role Models.” On the other hand, the whole tough guy tenderized by kid thing is better here than “Cop and a Half,” “My Spy,” and so many other interchangeable, forgettable others, not to mention Christoph Waltz’s “Old Guy,” which came out seven months ago.

In this case, Tommy’s charge is not exactly a kid. Julian (Jeremy Ray Taylor) is 18. Benson is alternately horrified and disgusted with him. He describes him to Tommy as “kind of like Rain Man but he really sucks at math.” Does he really think going out on a job with a hitman is going to make him into a model of toxic masculinity so he can take over the family business? This is not the kind of movie that ponders that question. We’ve got the set-up. What matters is how it is going to play out.

And that part, if you think of the carnage as a well-choreographed cartoon, is pretty good. Duhamel, amusingly but accurately described as having “oddly perfect bone structure,” also has oddly perfect and almost always overlooked timing. The done of this movie never quite settles, but Duhamel has a lock on Tommy’s character, and every minute he’s on screen is better than this movie has a right to be. It’s funny that just as Tommy’s aim is off due to his unwillingness to have his eyes checked, but Julian’s house of playing Fortnite have given him deadly accuracy with a gun.

The grudging teamwork that builds up between them is as plausible as it needs to be, as Tommy taps into the part of him that misses being a father to his son. It sags toward the end with that “Role Model” type veer into LARP and an oddly sour final moment. But it’s worth watching for Duhamel and the fight scenes.

Parents should know that this is an extremely violent story with the main character a hitman and many murders and injuries. There are some graphic and disturbing images and sounds, a brief non-explicit scene with porn, very strong language, drinking, and drugs.

Family discussion: Why wouldn’t Tommy get glasses? How did spending time with Tommy change Julian’s relationship with his father? How did their time together make Tommy think differently about his relationship with his son? Does a man have to solve his own problems? Why?

If you like this, try: “Shoot Em Up” and “Mr. Right”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Comedy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews
Spinal Tap II: The End Continues

Spinal Tap II: The End Continues

Posted on September 11, 2025 at 5:17 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated R for language and some sexual references
Profanity: Strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: Comic peril and violence
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: September 12, 2025
Copyright 2025 Bleecker Street

Remember that iconic moment in “Amadeus” when Salieri composes a simple little piece in honor of Mozart’s arrival, and then, the greatest composer of all time, only 25 years old and incapable of imagining Salieri’s bitter jealousy, sits down to play the piece and cannot help turning it into something magical. I could not help thinking of that moment when the real-life Sir Paul McCartney, after a flawless faux interview where he, seemingly sincere, describes a very crude lyric from one of fictional metal group Spinal Tap’s songs as “lit-ra-tchure.” It is followed by the genuine look on his face when he struggles to appear to enjoy their rehearsal performance. Then he sits down at a piano to show them some suggested tweaks, which they immediately reject.

I did not expect a sequel to exceed or even meet the level of the original Spinal Tap movie, which ushered in the era of the mockumentary and remains, to my mind, in the top ten funniest and most quotable feature films of all time. But whether you are a fan who has seen the original multiple times or are coming to these characters with no preconceived notions (but come on, watch the original!), you will have a lot of fun at this one, like the first a take that perfectly balances comedy with authenticity down to the details and a deep, unqualified affection for the souls who just want to share their music with an audience. Hey, Ozzie Osborne said he didn’t laugh at the original because it was too close to the truth.

I’m not going to spoil the surprises, the visits with characters from the first film and cameos from real-life legends. I’ll just say that it is extremely funny and point out that on the poster the number 2 is represented by a close-up of one of the megaliths from Stonehenge.

“The End Continues” begins with the classic premise: getting the band back together. They have not spoken in years and all seem settled with projects they like. But when the daughter of their late manager discovers that she has inherited their contract, she books them for one last performance, in New Orleans.

As fans well know, the band has lost a number of drummers over the years, apparently 11 of them, so one of their first tasks, after three star drummers turn them down, is to audition prospects, find one brave enough to take the job (Valerie Franco) and then rehearse to get ready for the show.

That’s pretty much it, but we do not need anything else except to revisit some of our favorite moments from the first film. It’s great fun to get a reprise of “Listen to the Flower People,” and yes, Nigel Tufnel (Christopher Guest) is still captivated by the possibilities of music technology. I hope the end does continue forever. Rock on, Nigel, David, and Derek, rock on!

Parent should know that this film has strong language, crude humor, sexual references, and bawdy lyrics.

Family discussion: What do the occupations of the musicians at the beginning of the film tell us about them? What real-life musicians do they resemble?

If you like this, try: the Christopher Guest films featuring many of these performers, including “Waiting for Guffman,” “Best in Show,” and “A Mighty Wind”

Related Tags:

 

Comedy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Musical Satire Series/Sequel
Splitsville

Splitsville

Posted on August 28, 2025 at 12:08 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for language, sexual content, and graphic nudity
Profanity: Very strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: Comic scuffles
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: August 29, 2025

Writer-director-star Michael Angelo Covino and his co-screenwriter and co-star Kyle Marvin have now made a second movie about a man who has sex with his friend’s romantic partner. In their last film, “The Climb,” a character confesses he has slept with his friend’s fiancée. In “Splitsville,” Carey (Covino) confesses he has slept with his friend’s wife. In both films, the focus is on the impact this has on the friendship of the two men, and it is mostly played for goofy comedy based on the cluelessness of the characters in various categories of adulting.

Copyright 2025 NEON

Carey and Ashley (Adria Arjona), his wife of 14 months, are driving to the beach house owned by Paul (Marvin) and his wife, Julie (Dakota Johnson). They are happily singing along to “What a Fool Believes” by the Doobie Brothers when they witness a terrible accident. This prompts Ashley to reach for a letter she has been working on (as she reads it aloud, she has to correct herself from the text’s “13 months”) telling Carey she wants a divorce and that she has repeatedly been unfaithful.

He is devastated. Paul and Julie do their best to comfort him. And they tell him they have an open marriage and allow each other to have sex with anyone they want, and Paul casually says he’d even be all right with it if Carey and Julie had sex. The next night, when Paul is away, Carey and Julie do. The next morning, Carey confesses and Paul is not all right with it. They get into a ridiculously chaotic scuffle, getting hurt and causing a lot of damage in the house.

Like the earlier film, “Splitsville” separates its chapters with mildly arch title cards, which occur over some indeterminate but apparently years-long period. Russ (Simon Webster), the son of Paul and Julie and a student at the private school where Casey is a PE teacher, does not get any older during this period, but this is not a movie where details like this matter. It’s more a “you know what would be funny?” kind of film, sketchy in both senses of the word.

Casey and Paul have been friends since childhood apparently out of inertia and the inability to make any other friends. Casey is good-hearted, considerate, honorable, and kind to a fault. Paul is none of those things. When Russ gets in trouble, his father tells him to lie and Casey advises him to tell the truth, then lies himself to take the blame. A lot of the humor in the film comes from the oddball slacker quality of the two leads. One example is that fight scene, which goes from slaps to low-level martial arts to a pause to rescue Russ’ fish after they crash the tank. They are very low key about situations most people would consider very high-intensity. The female characters are under-written, really there just to provide something for the men to react to.

Carey persuades Ashley not to get divorced, but continue to live together, with him sleeping on the sofa, she in the bed with a series of sexual partners. Casey is so agreeable, he invites them all to stay on in the house, scheduling movie nights (“Lorenzo’s Oil” is popular). While Ashley is a life coach and has a life coach of her own, it is Casey who is becoming something of a mentor to the discarded lovers. There are a bunch of very funny situations and comments. It just does not amount to much.

Parents should know that this film includes very strong language, explicit sexual references and non-explicit situations, graphic nudity, drinking, adultery, crimes, bullying, and adult themes.

Family discussion: What will happen to the couples after the movie? If you wrote a script with your best friend, what would it be about?

If you like this, try: “The Climb” and “Oh, Hello”

Related Tags:

 

Comedy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance
The Roses

The Roses

Posted on August 25, 2025 at 5:57 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for language throughout, sexual content, and drug content
Profanity: Constant very strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking, drugs, drunkenness
Violence/ Scariness: Comic, cartoon-style peril, characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: August 28, 2025
Copyright 2025 Searchlight

There’s a reason romantic fairy tales end with the wedding, assuring us that the couple lived happily ever after but not taking on the difficult task of showing us what that looks like. Very few movies attempt to show what happens after love is declared and the wedding cake has been served to the guests, when the couple has to figure out how to hold onto the stardust while sharing the grubbier and surprisingly controversial tasks of operating a household and, for many, raising children.

“The Roses,” like the 1989 Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner “War of the Roses,” is based on a book by Warren Adler. Gone Girl author Gillian Flynn calls that book “Terrifying, black-humored, black-hearted and bristling,” a description many people might apply to her own work. The book and the two movies are about a once-loving marriage that curdles into scabrous loathing.

This lightly adapted version, changing some details but retaining the vitriol, stars Benedict Cumberbatch as Theo, an architect, and Olivia Colman as Ivy, a chef. The movie opens in a disastrous session with a counselor, as the couple tries to come up with what they love about each other but cannot resist the temptation to insult each other as viciously as possible instead. The counselor tells them there may not be a way to move forward and we get a glimpse of the underlying connection between them. They cannot help laughing at the brutality of the insults. You know the song lyric, “too hot not to cool down?” This is “too hot to ever get irretrievably icy.”

We go back in time to see their meeting in London, both of them unhappy because their ideas are not appreciated by their employers. Their immediate attracting is electric and speaking of too hot not to cool down, minutes after meeting they are having sex in the refrigerator closet.

A few years later, they are in California, parents of twins. Theo is excited about the unveiling of his dream project, a maritime museum and Ivy enjoys her barely-breaking-even crab restaurant near the water. They disagree about some parenting choices; Ivy loves to give them sugary treats and Theo is all about eating healthy and working out. But they are endearingly supportive of one another.

And then, their fortunes turn upside down. Theo’s building collapses, along with his future in the profession, the same night Ivy’s 30 covers a day restaurant instantly becomes impossible to get a reservation following one rave review. Ivy takes over as breadwinner, and Theo takes over as full-time dad, housekeeper, and physical trainer for the twins, who are as into it as he is. This is when Theo and Ivy begin to resent and then feel like they loathe each other. They separate

Colman and Cumberbatch are so endlessly watchable that it’s almost easy to overlook that this is essentially a one-joke movie, the same one over and over as Ivy and Noah get increasingly more frustrated and hurt and lash out in increasingly more lacerating ways. Comedy often comes from seeing someone burn bridges we do not dare to. The brilliant supporting cast is woefully underused, except for Allison Janney, transcending the limits of the script as Ivy’s divorce lawyer, and it just gets exhausting. The ending tries to have it both ways, likely to leave audiences saying, “Wait, what?” On the way there, depending on your tolerance for people saying terrible things to their spouses, you may find it funny.

Parents should know that this movie includes very crude and graphic language and sexual references, extreme insults and pranks, and drinking, drunkenness, and drug use. While presented in a heightened comic tone, the underlying hostility may disturb some audience members.

Family discussion: Did you find yourself taking sides over the course of the film? Whose side? Did you switch sides?

If you like this, try; “The War of the Roses” and the book by Warren Adler and, for a more dramatic and romantic look at marital discord over the years, “Two for the Road”

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Comedy Family Issues movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Remake
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2025, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik