One Night Only

One Night Only

Posted on August 6, 2026 at 12:38 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for sexual material, language and brief nudity
Profanity: Very strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol and drug references
Violence/ Scariness: Comic peril, trips to the ER, no one badly injured
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: August 7, 2026
One Night Only
Copyright 2026 Universal

A ridicuously silly premise manages to stay out of the way and let the glossy rom-com take over. Extremely attractive people with great chemistry, some genuinely funny situations and a touch of wit in the dialogue, a bunch of top actors in small parts, and some surprisingly sharp satire around the edges (watch for the posters and ads) make this more fun that you might expect. It helps that the movie itself does not take the premise too seriously.

According to the opening text, three years ago, Congress passed a law criminalizing sex between unmarried people except for just 12 hours on one day a year, non-procreative sex only. It’s known as the Mandate. How is this monitored and enforced? Red biomarkers on the wrists of unmarried people turn green only for the one permissible 12 hour period. No reason to think about this too hard except that people get to choose the symbol, like a tattoo, a tattle-tale biomarker that reports their activities to the authorities. Why this annual exception? Political compromise. In present day, it is just hours before the markers turn green and almost all of the young singles are extremely excited and focused, dressing to impress and, for those not in relationships, trying to find someone as quickly as possible. Condoms are sold out all across the city, a scarce few left are going for very high surge prices. Lubricant is being handed out on the street.

And so we meet the couple we will be rooting for and through many obstacles and wrong turns they will make on the way there. Owen (Callum Turner, holding his own as a romantic lead) owns a small pizza parlor and is looking forward to having sex for the third time with his live-in girlfriend (Maya Hawke). But she tells him she is planning to have sex with their neighbor instead. Allie (Monica Barbaro) is still hurting from the guy who had sex with her and then ghosted her the year before. She agrees to go to a bar with her friend, but the friend immediately abandons her to go off and have sex with someone she met in the line for the bathroom.

Allie and Owen keep running into each other as they keep trying to have sex with people that never happens for a variety of reasons, ranging from slapsticky to more slapsticky. You’ll have time to watch for some details on ads and signs that are funnier than anything in the story. But the travails of the two give them time to get to know one another and time for us to want to see them together. Barbaro (Joan Baez in “A Complete Unknown”) shows an engaging warmth and a gift for comic timing. And some of the people they meet along the way are so game that they keep things going. The excellent supporting cast in even the smallest parts includes Mike Birbiglia, “SNL’s” Ben Marshall, Molly Ringwald(!) as Owen’s mother and LeVar Burton(!!) as her boyfriend, plus Ziwe, Este Haim (who provided the very fine music), Julia Fox, and King Princess.

Hey, it’s difficult these days to find a way to keep romantic couple we want to be together apart for the length of a movie, and this is no more artificial than, say, having one of them be a vampire. The movie has one wise choice — it doesn’t waste much time on the premise. And it has one advantage — some recent political developments may make that premise less outlandish than we thought. A lot of stuff we thought was impossible now seems more like…improbable. That considered, with some funny moments and an unexpectedly sweet conclusion, it’s very watchable.

Parents should know that this is a movie about sex and it is filled with sexual references and situations and brief nudity. Characters use strong and crude language and drink alcohol, there are references to drugs and comic mayhem that includes injuries and some visits to the ER.

Family discussion: What kinds of laws have governments made to put restrictions on sex? What rules should there be? Did Owen and Allie make the right choice as the exception hours were coming to an end?

If you like this, try: “The Broken Hearts Gallery”

Related Tags:

 

Comedy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance Satire
Toy Story 5

Toy Story 5

Posted on June 18, 2026 at 11:16 am

A-
Lowest Recommended Age: Kindergarten - 3rd Grade
MPAA Rating: Rated PG for some thematic elements and rude humor
Profanity: None
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: Cartoon-style peril and action, no one badly hurt
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: June 19, 2026
Toy Story 5
Copyright 2026 Disney/Pixar

The toys are back in town! Thankfully, we may grow older, but they stay the same. Well, almost. It’s been 36 years since “Toy Story,” the first feature-length computer animated film, dazzled us with its technical brilliance but was unforgettable because of its heart and wit and irresistible characters. Remember that the reason Pixar’s first feature was about plastic toys was that smooth, shiny surfaces was pretty much the only thing they could create in those early years of digital animation. Even then, right at the very beginning, Pixar addressed the complications of changes in technology, in the potential replacement of a beloved cloth-covered cowboy toy who had a pull-string with a plastic space adventurer who had wings and a light-up wrist weapon. And even then, in what would become one of Pixar’s most perceptive and meaningful themes, the bittersweet changes that come with growing up. Endearingly, it is also about the beauty of imagination, with the series itself a perfect exemplar. I love Pixar’s love for the weirdos because they are the ones who grow up and create magic.

One of my favorite details from the first film was the difference in the way Andy wrote his name on the boots of the two toys. He got Woody (Tom Hanks) when he was younger, so the N was backwards. But he had learned more when he received Buzz, and wrote his name correctly. And one of my favorite details from the series overall is that the first film begins with a painted sky on Andy’s ceiling. Then, when he leaves for college, having given his toys to Bonnie, we see him leaving, with the real, endless sky above him. These show the care that goes into every detail and the vision that extends beyond each film.

Every move toward independence and adulthood means leaving something behind. The “Toy Story” series has served as something of a meta-measuring stick to help us consider our own changes, with the children who saw the first one in theaters now bringing their own children to part 5. And through the magic of animation, they are able to appreciate that Tom Hanks and Tim Allen may get older, but they are still our Woody and Buzz.

Now in the fifth episode, it is all about new technology, this time as a central theme, explored with insight, adventure, and hilarious jokes. At 8, Bonnie still loves playing with her toys, and the movie begins with a hilarious “wedding” between Forky (Tony Hale) and Karen Beverly (Knifey, voiced by Melissa Villaseñor) that is disrupted when the maid of honor, Rex the T-Rex (Wallace Shawn) is poisoned.

Two new children have moved in across the street, but Bonnie is more comfortable with imaginary friends than real ones and is too shy to ask them to play with her. Her classmates have given up toys to play with LilyPad (Greta Lee), and Bonnie’s parents think she might be able to connect with them virtually, so they get one for her.

At first, it seems to work well. Bonnie is accepted into the virtual friend group and loves playing games so much she all but forgets her analog toys. She is delighted when she is asked to a slumber party, but the girls make fun of her for bringing her Jessie (Joan Cusack) doll. Bonnie wants to be a part of the group so she pretends to be too grown-up for toys, leading to one of the best movie lines of the year. Rex says, “Extinction! Not again!”

The toys are devastated, and the story allows Woody and Duke Kaboom (Keanu Reeves) who in the last epsiode were off on their own, to come back for support. Jessie is the heart of this epsiode, though, and with her trusty horse Bullseye, she is the one who figures out how to get Bonnie a friend and leads the rest through their adventures. She also learns some important lessons that help her understand her value and heal some past hurts.

There are some new characters, including discarded toys with once state-of-the-art tech that is now charmingly nostalgic. They include a potty-training aid called Smarty Pants providing some poop humor (Conan O’Brien), a hippo-shaped map toy named Atlas (Craig Robinson), and a camera toy with pixels almost as big as a postage stamp called Snappy (Shelby Rabara). Even though we see him only briefly, I have to mention the plastic slice of pizza with sunglasses because he is voiced by Super Bowl superstar Bad Bunny.

Even Buzz gets an tech upgrade as we meet crates-full of new and improved Buzzes that have some cool new functions but just as much existential confusion as Buzz in the first movie.

As often happens in “Toy Story,” the characters get separated from their child and each other, so there is a lot of adventure along the way. And there are new human characters, including a horse-loving girl named Blaze (Mykal-Michelle Harris) who could also use a friend who shares her love of imagination. Past “Toy Story” villains have included Sid, who loved to take the toys apart and blow them up, and Al, who saw the value of toys only in what he could get from selling mint, never-played-with versions. The threat here, from LilyPad, who begins by feeling threatened herself by the analog toys and committed to helping Bonnie “reach all of her developmental goals,” is tempered by a thoughtful, nuanced exploration of what it means to be useful, and recognition that it is difficult to lose a child to aging out of the toy stage, but what you give them helps them forever.

NOTE: Stay through the credits for extra scenes.

Parents should know that this movie includes peril and action, with no serious injuries, as well as a sensitive exploration of issues of agency, identity, and loss. And some poop humor.

Family discussion: What is or was your favorite toy and why? Which is your favorite of Bonnie’s toys? When do you use your imagination?

If you like this try: The “Toy Story” series and all of the Pixar films

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Animation Comedy Fantasy For the Whole Family movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Scene After the Credits Series/Sequel
Driver’s Ed

Driver’s Ed

Posted on May 14, 2026 at 5:54 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: MPAA for sexual references, alcohol use, language throughout, brief graphic nudity, and teen drinking
Profanity: Very strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Teen drinking, drugs and drug dealing
Violence/ Scariness: Comic peril and violence, crotch hits, car crash
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: May 15, 2026
Driver’s Ed
Copyright 2026 Amazon/MGM

Four high school seniors impulsively “borrow” a driver’s ed car from their school and go off on a journey to Chapel Hill in a movie from director Bobby Farrelly that just about makes up for its predictability with its unpretentiousness. This is a “just go with it” movie, with paper-thin characters and contrived situations, but it invites us to go along for the ride.

Sam Niviola (“White Lotus,” and son of Emily Mortimer and Alessandro Nivola) plays aspiring film-maker Jeremy, who desperately misses his girlfriend, Sam (Lilah Pate), already in college. In French class, the teacher catches him texting her and makes his classmate Evie (Sophie Telegadis) read it aloud. The earnest but ineffectual principal (Molly Shannon), more concerned about her job security than educating students or molding their characters, gives him a week’s detention.

An ineffectual but not earnest substitute driver’s ed teacher with both arms in casts (Kumail Nanjiani) takes Jeremy, Evie, and two other students out for a driving lesson. Don’t bother with the explanation of why four 18-year-olds don’t already have their licenses or how contrived it is that they are four ethnically diverse non-overlapping stereotypes who apparently have been watching each other closely since elementary school and have bite-sized story arcs to resolve their issues. Just go with it.

The other two students are Aparna (Mohana Krishnan), the study-all-the-time girl and Yoshi (Aidan Laprete), the apathetic slacker drug dealer. The appealing young actors all do their best to give some life to these paper-thin characters, but struggle with the lightly sketched emotional scenes. Inexplicably, both in terms of narrative and character, the one person who does not get a moment of confession leading to understanding and connection is Evie, whose reason for not having a driver’s license two years after eligibility is that she used to have friends drive her around but she “divorced” them all. This seems ripe for further examination, and failing to give her any kind of depth except for a palpable long-simmering crush on Jeremy might create more of a sag in the storyline if it wasn’t primarily focused on the incidents along the way.

Those include hitching a ride with a high-spirited couple, transporting a refrigerated truck filled with expensive furs they keep insisting have aphrodisiacal qualities, being chased by a determined cop (Bri Giger) who happens to be the former partner of the high school’s thrown off the force ineffectual (do we see a theme about the grown-ups here?) security guard, an encounter with an armed robber/drug dealer, and, in the film’s brightest performance, a. pre-med student (Marley Aliah) bringing an emotional support dog to comfort some sick kids.

It’s difficult to judge this film harshly because it is so soft-hearted that it is even sympathetic to a gun-toting drug dealer and even gives Jeremy a soft landing when he finally makes it to the campus and gets to talk to Sam. If it shifts his obsession with Sam into another relationship as ridiculously quick as Duckie at the end of “Pretty In Pink,” we cannot help but think a happy ending for everyone is just right.

Parents should know that this movie has teen drinking and drug use and two characters are drug dealers. Characters use very strong and crude language, peril and violence includes an armed robber and car chases and crashes and several crotch punches (no one badly hurt), sexual references and brief nudity and a lot of irresponsible behavior.

Family discussion: How did you/will you learn to drive? Why do you think Evie broke up with her friend group?

If you like this, try: a much better teens taking off for a road trip movie, “Paper Towns” and some of the movies Jeremy is inspired by

Related Tags:

 

Comedy High School movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Stories about Teens
The Devil Wears Prada 2

The Devil Wears Prada 2

Posted on April 30, 2026 at 5:06 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for strong language and some suggestive references
Profanity: Strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: None
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: May 1, 2026
Date Released to DVD: June 30, 2026
The Devil Wears Prada 2

Witty barbs, fabulous fashion, a touch of romance, some big name cameos and a sensational surprise appearance by a superstar singer — this sequel to the film that was foundational for a generation of millennials is worth the wait. There is a lot to love in The Devil Wears Prada 2 for those who are most familiar with the original (look for Andy’s cerulean blue sweater and a pair of near-identical belts) but returning screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna knows that the world has changed and her characters have, too.

In the original, based on the novel by former Vogue intern Lauren Weisberger, the fashion magazine plays an enormously influential role in a multibillion dollar industry. It’s not that Runway editor in Chief Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) can just get away with being legendarily imperious and laser-focused; she needs to be to do that job. Well, possibly she does not need to be quite so demanding, but as we saw when she acknowledged the reality of a second divorce in one of the first film’s key scenes, she has feelings and even moments of vulnerability.

Times have changed. When we last saw Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway), she was the second assistant to Miranda, essentially getting coffee, dropping off the draft versions of the magazine at Miranda’s home, and hanging up her coat. She was also being terrorized by the first assistant, Emily (Emily Blunt) and getting some support from the magazine’s loyal photo editor, Nigel (Stanley Tucci).

In the opening scene of the new film, Andy and the newspaper she works for receive prestigious journalism awards just as the entire staff is fired and the publication shut down by its new owners, some sort of investor group that sees them only as a balance sheet liability. Where the first film was based on the then-reasonable assumption that journalism produced credible information that was widely respected, even a speciality publication like a fashion magazine, this one recognizes that people are as likely to get their information from social media as a newspaper and that as a result of the cacophony of information and re-alignment of advertising and other revenue sources, the providers have become siloed and shrill.

Runway, perhaps from the pressure to publish constantly, made an embarrassing mistake in an article about a fast fashion brand and is widely derided for it. (The memes online are very funny). The wealthy owner of Runway and other publications, Irv Ravitz (Tibor Feldman) wants to respond by bringing in someone with excellent credentials as a journalist. So he hires Andy as Runway’s features editor without asking or even notifying Miranda. Her first assignment is to accompany Miranda and Nigel to grovel before one of their biggest advertisers, Dior, now led by Emily. And Miranda says to her, “All I need to do is bide my time until you fail.”

Miranda’s diva behavior may be diminished in light of the altered status of the magazine and a complaint to HR that now has her hanging up her own coats. But she is still a Dowager Duchess-level purveyor of acid commentary and Streep, as always is never short of magnificent, clearly relishing the opportunity to make Miranda more complex and real. Blunt, whose appearance in the first film was a major breakthrough for her, also gets to do more with Emily. All three are spectacular.

The men in the lives of these women are Kenneth Branagh as Miranda’s violinist husband (supportive), Justin Theroux as Emily’s billionaire boyfriend (comically arrogant), and Pete (Patrick Brammall), a dashing new love interest for Andy. They are very much secondary characters and do very well with it. Also worth spotting: Pauline Chalamet as a Runway staffer, Lucy Liu as a sought-after cover story subject, and many real-world celebrities, especially at Miranda’s Hamptons party, including Jon Batiste and  Suleika Jaouad,, Jenna Bush Hager, Naomi Campbell, Winnie Harlow, Donatella Versace, Molly Jong-Fast.

And the fashion! Wild and stunning. The glamor includes a fabulous fashion show in Milan in addition to the eye-popping ensembles of the stars. Watch for Streep’s amazing tassel jacket, which should inspire a lot of ransacking of thrift stores from DIY fashionistas.

The balance of fashion, fun, and character development keeps things moving and it’s thoughtful enough to have some meaning but light enough to be entertaining. A lot has changed in the worlds of fashion and journalism in two decades, but director David Frankel, screenwriter McKenna, and the powerhouse cast know what it takes to make a movie as irresistibly appealing as a classic little black dress.

Parents should know that this film has some strong language and some suggestive references. Characters drink alcohol.

Family discussion: What news sources do you like and why? What outfit in the movie was your favorite? Should Andy write the book?

If you like this, try: “The Devil Wears Prada” and a great documentary about Vogue, “The September Issue

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Drama DVD/Blu-Ray Pick of the Week Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance Series/Sequel
The Drama

The Drama

Posted on April 2, 2026 at 3:31 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R
Profanity: Constant very strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking and drunkenness, heroin
Violence/ Scariness: Extended discussion of school shootings, rifle, accident causes deafness
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: April 3, 2026

Love is the great human adventure but it is also the great human conundrum, which is why it drives us crazy. And also by there are so many stories, songs, paintings, novels, and theories about it. We all want it. And we are all terrified about being vulnerable enough to accept it, knowing we might come to depend on it and then lose it. And that presents itself in the core conflict. We want to be loved, which means being known. But if we allow ourselves to be known, we understand that we might scare off the very person we most want to love us. That is the precipice of intimacy that is very seldom . And that is the subject of “The Drama,” which has the courage to take on this conflict. It just doesn’t do a very good job. It’s non-stop cringe.

The Drama
Copyright A24 2026

It’s also the kind of movie actors like to be in because it presents them with some very intriguing acting challenges, and if you can handle the cringe, you will appreciate the performances. They are as excellent as we would expect from four of the best young actors working today.

The movie begins with a close-up of a very pretty ear. It belongs to Emma (Zendaya), who is reading a novel in a coffee shop. She has an earbud in the other ear. Charlie (Robert Pattinson) wants to find a way to talk to her, so he quickly looks up her book on GoodReads so he can pretend he read it. She does not respond. He thinks he’s blown it. But she did not hear him. She is deaf in that other ear. She encourages him to try again. And she forgives him on their first date when he has to confess that he never read the book.

That’s a flashback. In the movie’s present time, it is just a couple of days before their wedding and they are working on the speeches they will make after the ceremony, explaining what they love most about each other. Charlie is getting some help from his best man, Mike (Mamoudou Athie). Everything seems all set for happily ever after.

But then, at a tasting dinner with Mike and his wife, Rachel (Alaina Haim), who is Emma’s maid of honor, they all get a little tipsy (“This isn’t a bar,” the caterer mutters), and everyone makes the first of a series of excruciatingly painful mistakes. They decide they should each tell the story of the worst thing they ever did. And Emma’s is so shocking to the other three that it shatters their understanding of their relationship. Charlie starts to panic. He pesters Emma with questions, not trying so much to understand as he is to find a way to feel better about making a lifetime commitment. There’s a certain amount of projectile vomiting. And some more mistakes that just make things worse.

Some viewers may think Charlie should be concerned about another of Emma’s actions, one happening in the present, more concerning than the one from her mid-teens she picked as her worst. She makes a decision based on questionable evidence and without regard for the consequences. But the script makes this seem more like a distraction than a central counterpoint to the theme.

As noted, the performances are outstanding. In one scene, just after the big reveal, the couple are posing for the wedding photographer and it is an acting class to watch the hesitations and performative re-enactments of their pre-reveal comfort with each other. Their scenes together have an electricity beyond what the script intends. Athie understands the subtlety of Mike’s internal struggle to make everyone to get along, Hailey Benton Gates gives a vivid but layered performance as Charlie’s colleague, who tries to find a way to respond to Charlie’s inappropriate hypothetical as a subordinate who socializes with him (she and her plus one are wedding guests).

There are some sharp moments in the script but it is not up to the level of the settings, the score by Daniel Pemberton, or the performances. There’s not enough substance and way too much cringe.

Parents should know that this movie includes very disturbing content and references to school shootings. Characters use strong and crude language, drink, and use drugs, there are sexual references and explicit situations,

Family discussion: What would you have done if you were Emma? If you were Charlie? What will happen next?

If you like this, try: “Bad Sabbath” and “The Trouble with Jessica”

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Drama movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2026, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik