Interview: Lee Daniels of “The Butler”

Posted on August 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

“Lee Daniels’ The Butler” is inspired by the real-life story of a black man who worked in the White House for decades, serving eight Presidents from Truman to Reagan.  Born in the Jim Crow-era South of lynchings and segregation, he lived long enough to cast a vote for Barack Obama.  Forest Whitaker plays Cecil, the butler, Oprah Winfrey his wife, Gloria, and David Oyelowois their son, Louis, who becomes a leader in the Civil Rights movement.  The cast also includes Robin Williams as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Alan Rickman and Jane Fonda as Ronald and Nancy Reagan, John Cusack as Richard Nixon, and Vanessa Redgrave as a plantation owner.

One of the challenges of a film like this is dressing all the characters over decades of changes in style and fabrics.  How did you manage that?The-Butler-Winfrey-Whitaker_t620

That is the formidable and brilliant Ruth Carter, who does not get enough credit for her work.  She’s worked with Spike Lee on “Malcolm X” and some of his other films.  She’s an Academy Award-nominated African-American costume designer, the first I think, who really understood the period, really understood the generational differences as time passed and gave me her heart and soul.  She was as exciting to work with as Oprah.

How do you evoke the important details of such a large swath of history without getting lost?

We don’t focus on history.  History is the backdrop.  The focus is the family.  I have to tell what I know.  I’ve never been in the White House.  So that was really a specific choice to focus on the father and son love story and make the rest of it a backdrop, the White House and the Civil Rights movement.  Otherwise it is not a story; it’s a history lesson.  Danny Strong wrote an incredible script.  He know so much about history.  I had to do some research on the White House, but the sit-ins, the bus rides, the different drinking fountains, those were things my family and I experienced.  I once drank from a “whites only” fountain and got slapped by my dad.  I thought there would be Sprite coming out of there!  My experience is that experience, either from personal experience or from my mom or my dad, or my aunts and uncles and grandparents.

How did you talk with Forest Whitaker, who plays the title character, about the way his character would show his age over the course of the film?

He is one of if not the premier actors of our generation.  He brings a load of stuff that he’s studied and thought about.  For me, it was really about being a puppeteer, guiding him, telling him maybe a little too much here or there but it’s all him.  I just told him when to bring it down or bring it up, like adjusting the volume.  He comes at you like a cannon, but with humility.

Why was it so important to you to get Oprah Winfrey to appear in this film?

We are friends, because she produced “Precious.”  We were looking for something to do together.  But then she got nervous.  And I said, “Wait a minute.  You told me you were looking for something.  Now I done brought you something.  Now you’re getting nervous because of something called OWN.  I don’t care about OWN.  I care about seeing you as an actress, the way you were in ‘The Color Purple.'”  I pushed her, pushed her, begged, pleaded.  Cried.  Until she came to Poppa.  Then once I got her, it was intimidating.  Not because of her.  It was in my head.  I was “Oh, my God, it’s OPRAH!  What do I do?”  So it was about un-knowing her.  That’s what excites me as a director, taking people and confusing the audience about who they are, who they think they know.  Because I remembered the actor she was and the work she’d done for “The Color Purple.”  So it was about me stripping her down and once that happened she was vulnerable.  She was raw.  She was nervous.  She was anxious.  She was like a little girl.  And I felt very protective of her.  She was just one of the crew, lining up for that messy food at craft services with everyone else, one of the gang.  The only ego was the film.

What do you want people to talk about on the way home from this film?

How they could laugh and cry at the same time.  How I didn’t take it too seriously.  In the research I did with the slaves and the Civil Rights movement, they didn’t take it too seriously.  If they didn’t laugh, they got terrified.  So they had to laugh through the tears.  I hope people will say, “Lee Daniels did not take it too seriously, and by that he told the truth.”

There is a strong theme in the film about the meaning of service.  What does it mean to serve?

To help.  To help in any way possible.  Louis helped his country by doing what he did and Cecil helped his country by doing what he did.

Related Tags:

 

Directors Interview

This Week’s Releases: “The Butler,” “Kick-Ass 2,” “JOBS,” and “Paranoia”

Posted on August 11, 2013 at 3:59 pm

It’s another big week at the movies, with some of Hollywood’s biggest stars in two fact-based prestige movies with awards potential, a superhero sequel, and a twisty thriller based on a best-selling novel.

The Butler (2013) Forest Whitaker (Screengrab)Formally called “Lee Daniels’ The Butler,” following a petty title rights dispute, this is the “Precious” director’s epic based on the real-life story of a black man who served eight Presidents from the Jim Crow era through the era of the Civil Rights movement.  Stars include Oscar winners Forest Whitaker, Robin Williams, Jane Fonda, and Cuba Gooding, Jr., as well as Oprah Winfrey, Mariah Carey, James Marsden, Alan Rickman and Terrence Howard.

“JOBS” has Ashton Kutcher as the late founder of Apple and Pixar. “Paranoia” stars Harrison Ford, Gary Oldman, Amber Heard, and Liam Hemsworth in a story of corporate espionage based on the best-selling thriller about corporate espionage by Joseph Finder.

And “Kick-Ass 2” is the sequel to the controversial, ultra-violent story based on the comics from Mark Millar and John Romita. Jim Carrey joined the cast — but has now distanced himself from the film because of its violent content.

Related Tags:

 

Opening This Week

Shushers vs. Texters at the Movies — Which Side Are You On?

Posted on August 11, 2013 at 8:00 am

laurel hardy shhhIn what may be one of the biggest online troll posts of all time, Anil Dash has come out in favor of texting and talking while watching a movie at the theater.  He thinks it is unfair and unrealistic to expect moviegoers to sit quietly when it is much more enjoyable to interact with the movie, fellow audience members, and whoever they want outside the theater.  And Hunter Walk suggested that some movie theaters offer wi-fi and brighten the lights so that the audience members can have a rich second-screen experience.

“You can’t make it go away, you cannot stop it, you can’t slow it down, you can’t wish for it to end, you can’t deny them the sheer carnal pleasure of straight up talking through a film. I’m not talking about a quick, quiet aside in a moment of duress during a screening, I’m talking about “Let’s discuss cricket scores!” during the baptism scene in the Godfather….We’re the majority. We’re normal. Your bullying hasn’t worked. The only logical next step is to find a way to accommodate us. Or you could do that thing where you turn around and glare really fiercely—it seems to be working great!”

Dash generously points out that just because texters insist on their right to distract those around them, that does not mean they are encouraging others to do to same.  Anyone who does not want to text won’t be forced to do so!  Or, perhaps there could be special quiet places like the Alamo Drafthouse for those who want to watch movies without distractions.

Of course, this pretty much rebuts itself, but Slate has a good response on behalf of the people who actually want to enjoy the film without distractions from Aisha Harris.  “e argues that because movie theaters are a public space, people should be able to treat it the way they would “any other public space.” Yet in all public spaces, there are standard, agreed-upon rules of etiquette which involve respecting the space and wishes of others around you.”

The best round-up is from Richard Lawson at Atlantic Wire.

Please don’t use your cellphones in movie theaters. That’s all. Because one activity is passive and unobtrusive — sitting quietly and watching what everyone’s there to watch — and the other is active, aggressive even. Dash wants us to feel ashamed for demanding that everyone behave exactly like us, when the real crux of the matter is that everyone mutually agreeing to do nothing but watch the movie is a more reasonable request, in a logical and even factual way, than expecting everyone to just put up with whatever the person next to them wants to do. Dash says the shushers are trying to block out the world, when I think it’s the opposite. Being considerate of those around you — recognizing that they might want to watch a movie in the quiet dark — is an act of communion. Whereas the alternative is basking obliviously in the self-important glow of your telephone.

The presumption should be that people buy tickets to see and hear the movie, not that they buy tickets to have a party while the movie is going on.  The people who make movies design them to be seen in the dark, quiet, cathedral-like setting of a movie theater.  Yes, people watch them on their phones and on airplanes and while they’re on a treadmill.  Maybe someday in a grand blending of movies and games there will be entertainment designed for the kind of interactive experience that requires wi-fi and having the lights on.  But the theater is where we get to see movies the way they were meant to be seen.  Let’s keep it that way.

Related Tags:

 

Commentary

Before You Download that “Educational” App for Your Baby

Posted on August 10, 2013 at 3:59 pm

The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission charging that “educational” apps for babies do not have any documented value.  This is the same group that made the charges against Baby Einstein that led to a settlement that had Disney offering refunds to consumers who relied on their claims that the DVDs were beneficial to babies.  CCFC says:

The false and deceptive marketing by Fisher-Price and Open Solutions creates the impression that their apps effectively educate infants when time with tablets and smart phones is actually the last thing babies need for optimal learning and development. Both companies claim that their mobile apps will teach babies skills and information-including words and numbers- but neither company offers any evidence to back up their claims. To date, not a single credible scientific study has shown that babies can acquire language or math skills from interacting with screens. In addition, screen time may be harmful for babies. Research links infant screen time to sleep disturbances and delayed language acquisition, as well as problems in later childhood, such as poor school performance and childhood obesity. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends discouraging screen time for children under two.

In their cover letter, CCFC notes that “According to a 2012 report by the Joan Ganz Cooney Center, over 80% of the top-selling apps in the “Education” category of the iTunes’ App Store target children. Sixty percent of the top 25 apps target toddlers and preschool children—more than double the percentage that target adults.”

The companies charged are Fisher-Price and Open Solutions, whose apps like “Laugh and Learn” purport to teach babies counting, words, or motor skills.  Studies show that babies learn far more effectively from interaction with people than they do from machines.  To add your name to the complaint against companies making unsubstantiated claims that their products benefit babies, visit the CCFC site.

Related Tags:

 

Internet, Gaming, Podcasts, and Apps Parenting Preschoolers Understanding Media and Pop Culture

Trailer: Monuments Men

Posted on August 10, 2013 at 8:00 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CreneTs7sGs

This looks great — a real-life heist film where the good guys are the ones protecting the world’s art treasures from the ravages of WWII, with George Clooney, John Goodman, Cate Blanchett, “The Artist’s” Jean DuJardin, and Matt Damon.  Kind of a cross between “Oceans 11” and “Argo.”

 

Related Tags:

 

Trailers, Previews, and Clips
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik