The Real Story: “Rush” and the Formula One Rivalry Between Hunt and Lauda

Posted on September 27, 2013 at 3:59 pm

“Rush,” directed by Ron Howard and written by Peter Morgan, is the story of the rivalry between 1970’s Formula One drivers James Hunt and Niki Lauda.  Much of it is true, including many of the statements made by the characters and the outcomes of the races, but this is not a documentary.  There is some dramatic license to convey in two hours the events of several years.  (SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read further if you have not seen the movie.)  For example, the real life vote about whether to proceed with the race in the rain was not overwhelmingly in favor of proceeding.  It was won by a single vote.

1975-james-suzy-hunt

James Hunt‘s official Formula One Hall of Fame page describes him: “As a colourful personality and unconventional character he had no peers – alternately entertaining admirers and offending critics with his often outrageous behaviour…James worked at odd jobs, bought a wrecked Mini and spent two years race-preparing it, only to have his first entry fail scrutineering because the driver’s seat was an old lawn chair.  Many of his early races ended in huge accidents. In one of them his Formula Ford crashed and sank in the middle of a lake. He might have drowned had he been wearing the requisite seatbelts he couldn’t afford to buy.”

As shown in the film, he did originally get his funding from Lord Hesketh, who ran out of money when he could not secure a sponsor after moving Hunt from Formula Three to the more expensive Formula One.  Hesketh’s group was known for its champagne before races and putting the crew up in luxury hotels.  James Hunt did marry the model Suzy Hunt and she did leave him for Richard Burton.  Suzy Hunt married Burton after his second divorce from Elizabeth Taylor.  Burton paid the $1 million divorce settlement that would otherwise have been James Hunt’s responsibility.  Hunt became a racing commentator and died at age 42.

LaudaNiki Lauda is serious-minded Austrian who was Formula One champion three times.  His Formula One Hall of Fame page describes his accident: “In hospital, with first to third degree burns on his head and wrists, several broken bones and lungs scorched from inhaling toxic fumes, Niki Lauda was given up for dead and administered the last rites by a priest.  Six weeks later, with blood seeping from the bandages on his head, he finished fourth in the Italian Grand Prix. Astonished doctors said he had recovered by sheer force of will. Jackie Stewart said it was the most courageous comeback in the history of sport. Niki said the loss of half an ear made it easier to use the telephone. In consideration of those who found his facial disfigurement unsightly he thereafter wore a red baseball cap, hiring it out to a sponsor for a hefty fee.”

The rivalry was real.  But there was friendship there, too.  The men actually even roomed together for a while.  And when Hunt died, Lauda said, “For me, James was the most charismatic personality who’s ever been in Formula One.”

 

Related Tags:

 

Spoiler Alert The Real Story

Are Spoilers Really That Bad?

Posted on August 7, 2013 at 3:59 pm

I love this “Portlandia” skit about spoilers.

The whole issue of spoilers has become very complicated because of all the time-shifting and binge-watching in the way we consume media.  I don’t like spoilers and really work hard to keep them out of my reviews.  I used to try to read as much as possible about a movie before I saw it but I discovered that I enjoy them more if I know less.

But Esther Zuckerman argues in favor of spoilers on The Atlantic Wire.

Spoilers don’t actually ruin viewing experience, if the show is good I’m not the first person to argue this. Poniewozik himself did it last year. ” takes away the tantalizing sensation of realizing that, in just a few weeks or days or hours, you’ll know this thing that you do not now know,” he writes. “But it doesn’t take away the myriad surprises on the way to getting there, the thrills and pleasures of watching a story play out.” I actually find that if I know the big reveal, I can watch a show more carefully leading up to that moment. Since I watched the entirety of Buffy the Vampire Slayer on Netflix, long after it originally aired, I was primed to most of the big surprises. For instance, I knew that at beginning of season five the show would give Buffy a sister. Knowing that already meant I wasn’t angered by the choice, but more interested in figuring out how that major move was accomplished and why it weirdly worked. Chances are if a spoiler ruined the experience of watching or reading something for you, then it wasn’t worth watching or reading to begin with.

Spoilers can only make you more excited to see something With all due respect to Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner—the don, no pun intended, of spoiler-phobes—but his strict rules for critics actually aren’t doing him any favors. By forbidding critics to write about new characters or new relationships in any way, he kills the element of the tease. On the same note, it’s baffling to mewhy J.J. Abrams didn’t want to use the fact that his villain was in fact Khan as a way to draw people into the theater.  (Not that it really mattered; Star Trek Into Darkness still did big business.)

What do you think?

Related Tags:

 

Commentary Spoiler Alert Understanding Media and Pop Culture

Game of Thrones and the Red Wedding

Posted on June 3, 2013 at 11:35 am

Spoiler Alert!  Spoiler Alert!

If you are a Game of Thrones fan, you already know the bad news.  Those who know the books knew it was coming.  In theory, fans understand that one of the elements that makes George R. R. Martin stories so unusual is that he kills off major, beloved characters.  And thus we had what Entertainment Weekly described as “one of the most shocking, brutal and disturbing sequences ever put on television.”  The slaughter of two major characters as well as many others lit up Twitter and Facebook with outrage and grief.

EW also has an exclusive interview with Martin.  Here is an excerpt:

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: How early in the process of writing the book series did you know you were gonna kill off Robb and Catelyn?
GEORGE R.R. MARTIN: I knew it almost from the beginning. Not the first day, but very soon. I’ve said in many interviews that I like my fiction to be unpredictable. I like there to be considerable suspense. I killed Ned in the first book and it shocked a lot of people. I killed Ned because everybody thinks he’s the hero and that, sure, he’s going to get into trouble, but then he’ll somehow get out of it. The next predictable thing is to think his eldest son is going to rise up and avenge his father. And everybody is going to expect that. So immediately became the next thing I had to do.

Since Song of Ice and Fire so often subverts reader expectations and avoids traditional fantasy storytelling structures, should fans have any real hope that this tale will have a happy ending? As The Boy recently said on Thrones, “If you think this has a happy ending, you haven’t been paying attention.”
I’ve stated numerous times that I anticipate a bittersweet ending.

And New York Magazine has an interview with Michelle Fairley, who played Catelyn Stark, the bride who sacrificed herself in a failed attempt to save the man she loved.  An excerpt:

You’ve inhabited her for so long. Is it hard to let Catelyn go?

I’ve had three amazing years working on this incredible series, and I’ve completely fallen in love with the character. She is infuriatingsometimes because she is so honorable. And she does constantly do the right thing. But she’s a driven woman. She’s strong. And that’s what I love about her, is that she’s grown since the death of her husband. She continues to grow. But it’s a growth that she has to do unwillingly because of the circumstances. It’s not about improving herself in an enlightened way. It’s about achieving her goal, which is to get through the suffering and get her children back together. All she wants is to get in, shut the gates of Winterfell, and keep them in there. And that’s not going to happen. And it is very hard, because the people I’ve worked with have become such good friends, the crew and everybody. So it is sad to say good-bye.

What do you think?  What will happen next?

Related Tags:

 

Spoiler Alert Television

John Hanlon’s 10 Differences Between the Hunger Games Book and Movie

Posted on March 23, 2012 at 11:43 am

My friend John Hanlon launched his new website today with a terrific list of the 10 biggest differences between the Hunger Games book and movie.  Big spoilers alert, but when you know them both, it is both thoughtful and lots of fun.  I actually liked the movie better than the book, partly because instead of the subjective re-telling by Katniss it is an objective and more cinematic version of the story.  I agreed with the decisions about what and where to trim.  And of course the movie benefited tremendously from the performance of Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss.

Related Tags:

 

Books Spoiler Alert
Spoiler Alert: What This Week’s Two Big Action Blockbusters Have In Common

Spoiler Alert: What This Week’s Two Big Action Blockbusters Have In Common

Posted on December 15, 2011 at 5:37 pm

Just in time for the holidays, two huge Hollywood action films are arriving in theaters.  One is set in Victorian times and one in present-day.  But they have more in common than mysteries, chases, explosions, trains, and meaningless after-the-colon titles.  They both star actors from the superb Swedish “Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” series, just as the American remake with Daniel Craig and Rooney Mara is about to open next week.  In “Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol” Michael Nyqvist plays a brilliant scientist after some nuclear launch codes.  In “Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows,” Noomi Rapace plays a gypsy looking for her missing brother.

The movies have something else in common — a remarkable similarity in the aspirations of the villains.  They may be a century apart but their outlook and their dastardly plans are very similar.  I don’t think it’s a coincidence but I don’t think there was any copying involved.  I think both are a reflection of current concerns about world affairs while general enough to be fun-scary, not scary-scary.  When you see them, let me know what you think!

 

 

Related Tags:

 

Spoiler Alert Understanding Media and Pop Culture
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2024, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik