TRON: Ares

TRON: Ares

Posted on October 7, 2025 at 1:44 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for violence and action
Profanity: Brief strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: Extended fantasy/sci-fi peril and violence, sad deaths of family members
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: October 10, 2025

The latest in the series about sentient characters in a digital world follows in the tradition of its two predecessors: the creativity is in the visuals, with very little in the storyline, and almost none in the characters and dialogue. The visuals are excellent, though, so if you see it, make sure to see it in IMAX.

Copyright 2025 Disney

The original “TRON” (1983) was inspired by the video games that were captivating a new generation (indeed, the video game it inspired out-grossed the film). Like its sequel, “TRON: Legacy” (2010), it took place mostly in a digital world. This movie, reflecting the cultural impact of the technologies that move much faster than we can comprehend or control them, shows us the wall between “real” and virtual is dissolving.

It begins with glimpses of various news broadcasts reporting on the developments at two huge software companies. One is ENCOM, where Jeff Bridges’ character Kevin Flynn worked in the earlier films. It was then led by the benign, public-spirited Kim sisters, who wanted to use technology to feed people, cure diseases, and “uplift humanity.” The other is Dillinger Systems, recently taken over by Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters), grandson of the founder (the bad guy in the original film). Julian wants to use technology to create weapons, including AI soldiers who are vastly more capable than any human, and, this is a key value proposition, “100 percent expendable.” The enemy “kills” one? We’ll sell you more! And why not make these soldiers not just humanoid, but gorgeous humanoids? Thus, the sample AI-soldiers look just like Athena (Jodie Turner-Smith) and Ares, played by Jared Leto, who says that the original film transfixed him when it first came out, and is a producer of this film

There’s just one problem that Julian manages to keep from the world leaders at his demo. The soldiers collapse into ash-like piles of code after just 29 minutes. If he is going to conquer the world, he needs to find the “permanence” code he suspects ENCOM has discovered. His mother, Elisabeth (a wasted Gillian Anderson) tries to warn him that he is being reckless, but he will not listen.

Meanwhile, Eve Kim (Greta Lee) is in fact discovering that code with the help of her assistant, Seth (Arturo Castro), on floppy disks left in a remote outpost by her late sister. Julian sends Ares and Athena to steal the code as characters — and code — go back and forth between the digital and analog worlds.

The visuals from production designer Darren Gilford) are dazzling, especially the motorcycles, ultra-modern and OG, the visualization of the cyber-heist, the action conflicts, the ribbons of light and a very cool winged flying contraption, though another flying thing that looks like something between goal posts on a football field and the Arc du Triomphe seems more dramatic than aerodynamic. The sound design is excellent, thanks to supervising sound editor Baard H. Ingebretsen and the whole sound department. The score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross is also first-rate, as we expect from the impressively versatile Oscar winners.

It is frustrating to see this movie almost approach some of the real and fascinating questions of AI and then swerve away for yet another “Pinocchio” story about what makes a real boy, much more thoughtfully and provocatively explored in films like “Blade Runner,” and, in a way, by every movie because they are all about what makes us most human: love, compassion, curiosity, humor, the quest for making things better. I was much less interested in whether Ares would develop feelings beyond vocabulary than I am in what we do about characters like Julian, who are unconstrained by norms, or concern for anyone but himself. The script equivalent of the 29 minute AI soldier collapse is giving Julian and his mother less depth than an 8 bit NPC. Eve, Seth, and Ajay (Hasan Minhaj) are not much better, and it is truly a shame to see this exceptional performers given so little to work with. I mean, Tilly Norwood could have handled this just as well, which is a reflection on her limitations, not her capacity.

That includes dialogue like “Maybe there is something wrong with me.” “Maybe there is something right with you.”

I did laugh at Ares’ appreciation for Depeche Mode. This is an entity made from data who has absorbed every bit and byte of information since the world began including all of Eve’s text messages, and what Ares likes is the ineffable pull of 80s British synth-pop? (He manages a kind word for Mozart.)

Jeff Bridges does show up in beatifically magisterial and most welcome mode, playing a Wizard of Oz-like figure (Julian’s interface is strongly reminiscent of the fake Oz in the MGM version), reminding us that there are some things AI cannot match. So far.

Parents should know that this movie includes extended fantasy/sci-fi peril and action with some violence and two sad deaths of family members. There is brief strong language.

Family discussion: Who should monitor and control AI? If you went into the digital world, what would you do? Why did Ares say once was enough?

If you like this, try: the other “Tron” movies and the “Blade Runner” films

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure IMAX movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Scene After the Credits Science-Fiction Series/Sequel
One Battle After Another

One Battle After Another

Posted on September 25, 2025 at 5:03 pm

A-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for pervasive language, violence, sexual content, and drug use
Profanity: Constant very strong, bigoted, and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking and drugs
Violence/ Scariness: Characters in peril, some injured and killed, graphic and disturbing images, guns and bombs
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie, racist characters
Copyright 2025 Warner Brothers

Writer/director Paul Thomas Anderson (“Boogie Nights,” “Magnolia,” “The Phantom Thread”) has taken a novel written 35 years ago by an author often described as “unfilmable” and turned it into a vital, provocative, and disturbingly (in a good way) of-the-moment two hour and forty minute film that seems to go by in half the time. The film is a grand epic anchored by three Oscar-winners bringing their A game. It balances action, politics, metaphor, and satire, with heightened characters who are larger than life but still feel real and a knockout, urgently percussive score from Johnny Greenwood. There is also humor, some slapstick, though not handled quite as deftly.

While much of the story is original, like Thomas Pynchon’s 1990 book, Vineland, the story is about a couple who were in a militant activist group, here called the French 75. The couple is identified by the authorities just after their child was born. The woman went into the witness protection program and the man and the baby got new identities and were relocated by French 75.

Elements of the story evoke the unrest of the 1960s, when the most extreme activists protesting the Vietnam War and racial injustice broke the law, even becoming violent. The Weather Underground’s name was inspired by the Bob Dylan line that “You don’t have to be a weather man to know which way the wind blows.”Weather Underground’s Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert served more than 20 years in maximum-security prisons for their roles in a 1981 Brink’s robbery in upstate New York, in which a guard and two police officers were killed while Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers were on the run from the authorities (partly inspiring the film “Running on Empty”).

French 75 is a Weather Underground-inspired group, but their attacks are even more militaristic and violent. Anderson’s script is very loosely based on the book and substitutes more timely issues and attitudes. While, like the group in the Pynchon book they have broadly anti-capitalist, anti-oppression views, we meet them as they are about to raid a US immigration center on the Mexican border.

The character who will be called Bob for most of the film (Leonardo DiCaprio) is in charge of explosives. Perfidia (Teyana Taylor) is one of the leaders, with a fierce, aggressive attitude and a lot of guns. The soldier in charge of the center is Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn in an incendiary performance, one of his best in years. Just watch the way he walks, the heft of his shoulders. Perfidia confronts him in a scene charged with highly sexualized power dynamics. He is humiliated and enthralled.

French 75 operatives zip tie the hands of the military and unlock the cages filled with rows of cots with people shivering under silvery Mylar blankets, one of innumerable striking images from cinematographer Michael Bauman. The raiders lead the immigrants into a truck and take them across the border into the US.

Perfidia is passionate about the issues and perhaps even more by the excitement and adrenaline of their raids. Bob, a bit shy and nerdy, shows her how he builds the explosives and she finds it thrilling. Soon they are a couple. Meanwhile, Lockjaw is obsessed with her. When she is captured, he says he will help her if she is nice to him. That means naming names of French 75 members and it means sex.

Perfidia has a baby, but soon leaves the infant with Bob and disappears. Sixteen years later, the couple and the baby are hiding out. No one knows where Perfidia is; she ran away from witness protection. The father and daughter, now called Bob and Willa (an outstanding debut by Chase Infiniti), are living quietly in a small Colorado town.

Lockjaw, still in the army and still deeply conflicted, wants to find Willa to determine if he is her father, and if so, to eliminate her. Perfidia is Black and Lockjaw, like Bob, is white. Lockjaw is desperate to join an elite club of the ruling class, which accepts only members who are “homegrown” (white, American-born, and gentile, with no ties to anyone who is not). If Willa is his daughter, he will not be eligible for membership. He finds out where Bob and Willa are hiding and fabricates a reason to be deployed to the area, arriving with a platoon of heavily armed soldiers.

Willa is frustrated by Bob’s constant use of marijuana and alcohol and by what she sees as his paranoia and overly strict rules. She goes to a school party with friends and is captured. Bob, with the help of Willa’s martial arts teacher, known as Sensei (Benicio Del Toro), goes after her, still wearing the ratty bathrobe he was wearing as he waited for her at home, smoking weed and watching “Battle of Algiers.” He has a special gizmo that French 75 gave him to help find her 16 years earlier, but it has been a while and he has abused many substances, so he cannot quite remember the passwords he needs to get help from the underground network or find a place to charge his phone. (The humor of this situation wears thin.)

We go back and forth from the military interrogations (even the bravest crumble when their families are at risk) to exceptionally well-designed, very exciting various efforts to capture and rescue Willa and her attempted escapes. There are fascinating characters along the way, including weed-growing nuns, the “homegrown” cabal, and a Native American tracker/hitman.

There will be a lot of conversations about this film, and a lot of arguments about how to unpack it. Anderson has enough respect for the audience not to make it easy and enough pure talent to keep us enthralled enough to try to parse it. While there are some exaggeratedly blatant villains in the film, the more important characters are the conflicted Lockjaw and the ineffectual Bob. The best clue is with the title, reminding us, again, that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

Parents should know that this movie includes peril and violence with characters injured and killed and graphic and disturbing images. guns, bombs, militant and military activity, guns and bombs. Characters smoke, drink, and use drugs and very strong and crude language. Characters are bigoted and use offensive terms.

Family discussion: How have things changed since the book that inspired this movie was written? Is Bob a good father?

If you like this, try: “White Noise”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Based on a book Comedy Drama movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Politics Satire
London Calling

London Calling

Posted on September 18, 2025 at 5:08 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong/bloody violence, language throughout, drug use and some sexual content
Profanity: Constant strong and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol, drug dealing
Violence/ Scariness: Character is an assassin, constant violence with many characters injured and killed, graphic bloody disturbing images, murder played for comedy
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: September 19, 2025
Copyright 2025 Quiver

Like its handsome anti-hero, this movie sometimes misfires, but it is easy on the eyes.

Josh Duhamel, always excellent, plays Tommy Ward, a hitman for some British gangsters. He’s reached that age when he should have his eyes checked, but he is too stubborn and perhaps too vain, so he just squints a bit more when he points his gun. In the opening scene, at a masquerade ball, he is directed to kill a guy in a horse mask. Because of his poor vision, he mistakenly kills someone in a donkey mask. This sets the dark comic tone for the film, but it doesn’t have the unabashed, slightly sociopathic brio of “Pulp Fiction,” so if a lethal “oops” doesn’t strike your funny bone, this film may not be for you.

To make it worse, the man Tommy killed is a distant relative of the crime boss, Freddy Darby (Aiden Gillan), who is known, as we are repeatedly told, for taking family very seriously. So after a quick farewell to his young son, now living with his ex-wife and her new husband, Tommy escapes to Los Angeles, as far from London as he can.

Some time later, we see Tommy driving a beater car and working for an LA crime boss named Benson (Rick Hoffman). Freddy discovers where Tommy is and comes after him. The only way for Tommy to get away is to train Benson’s doughy, LARP-ing teenage son in the ways of the assassin.

That whole tough guy forced to spend time with LARP kid thing was handled much better in “Role Models.” On the other hand, the whole tough guy tenderized by kid thing is better here than “Cop and a Half,” “My Spy,” and so many other interchangeable, forgettable others, not to mention Christoph Waltz’s “Old Guy,” which came out seven months ago.

In this case, Tommy’s charge is not exactly a kid. Julian (Jeremy Ray Taylor) is 18. Benson is alternately horrified and disgusted with him. He describes him to Tommy as “kind of like Rain Man but he really sucks at math.” Does he really think going out on a job with a hitman is going to make him into a model of toxic masculinity so he can take over the family business? This is not the kind of movie that ponders that question. We’ve got the set-up. What matters is how it is going to play out.

And that part, if you think of the carnage as a well-choreographed cartoon, is pretty good. Duhamel, amusingly but accurately described as having “oddly perfect bone structure,” also has oddly perfect and almost always overlooked timing. The done of this movie never quite settles, but Duhamel has a lock on Tommy’s character, and every minute he’s on screen is better than this movie has a right to be. It’s funny that just as Tommy’s aim is off due to his unwillingness to have his eyes checked, but Julian’s house of playing Fortnite have given him deadly accuracy with a gun.

The grudging teamwork that builds up between them is as plausible as it needs to be, as Tommy taps into the part of him that misses being a father to his son. It sags toward the end with that “Role Model” type veer into LARP and an oddly sour final moment. But it’s worth watching for Duhamel and the fight scenes.

Parents should know that this is an extremely violent story with the main character a hitman and many murders and injuries. There are some graphic and disturbing images and sounds, a brief non-explicit scene with porn, very strong language, drinking, and drugs.

Family discussion: Why wouldn’t Tommy get glasses? How did spending time with Tommy change Julian’s relationship with his father? How did their time together make Tommy think differently about his relationship with his son? Does a man have to solve his own problems? Why?

If you like this, try: “Shoot Em Up” and “Mr. Right”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Comedy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews
Nobody 2

Nobody 2

Posted on August 14, 2025 at 5:37 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong bloody violence and language throughout
Profanity: Very strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol, drug dealing
Violence/ Scariness: Extended very intense and graphic violence, characters injured and killed, graphic and disturbing images
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: August 15, 2025

The first “Nobody” (2021) was a surprise, with Bob Odenkirk, who was not an action movie star, playing a guy no one would expect to be willing and very, very able to fight lots of intimidating guys with many weapons. It was popular enough for a sequel, based on the same kind of “who is that guy?” expectations. Basically, it’s a cartoonish but extremely violent series of fight scenes, but the dark humor, improvised weaponry, and good spirits make it very entertaining. If you don’t get too rattled by the very graphic and disturbing images.

Copyright 2025 Universal

Like the first film, this begins with Hutch (Odenkirk), bloodied and bruised and, this time, apparently missing part of a finger, being interrogated by a pair of FBI agents. Then we go back to find out what happened.

Following the events of the first film, Hutch (Odenkirk) is in debt to a criminal kingpin known as The Barber (Colin Salmon). His wife, Becca (Connie Nielson) knows that his “job” is paying off that debt by undertaking tasks that involve grave danger. After a brief scene with Hutch waiting in a hotel lobby, wearing a badge from some kind of conference (clearly camouflage), we see him follow some guys in dark suits into an elevator. And then, jump to another rewind as he explains to The Barber what happened, setting the heightened tone for what is ahead, basically: extreme violence along the lines of a Looney Tunes cartoon, if Hutch was Road Runner AND Wile E. Coyote AND all the blow-up equipment from Acme.

As Hutch’s family gets up in a series of mornings, we can see that like many families they are stressed and feeling disconnected. Hutch’s wife, Becca (Connie Nielson) and son Brady (Gage Munroe) resent Hutch for being gone all the time. His younger daughter, Sammy (Paisley Cadorath) is just glad to see him when he’s there. Hutch decides the solution is a family vacation. He tells The Barber he’s taking a break, and books a visit to the place where he was happiest as a child, a small tourist town with a water park. They swing by to pick up Hutch’s father, David (Christopher Lloyd).

It’s rickety and cheesy, especially the “honeymoon suite” festooned with fake palm leaves, but Becca appreciates the effort and the family is determined to do their best to enjoy it. But at an arcade, Brady gets into an altercation with a teenage townie and that brings the family to the attention of the cruel and corrupt local sheriff (Colin Hanks) and the businessman who runs the town, Henry (John Ortiz).

This leads to a series of one-upping fight scenes, building to a confrontation with a small army working for the evil crime boss known as Landina (Sharon Stone, having a blast dancing in a pants suit and stabbing a cheating gambler in the hand). A most-welcome RZA shows up again as Hutch’s katana-master brother.

Director Timo Tjahjantoo, taking over from Ilya Naishuller, makes the best of the fight scenes, with a “John Wick” level of balletic movement. Hutch’s specialty, in addition to a John Wayne-category punch, is his ability to improvise with whatever is around him, and this movie gives him plenty to improvise with, from the emergency phone in an elevator to the pieces of the games at an arcade, equipment on a boat, and the final confrontation, boobytrapping an old-school water park like it’s Kevin’s house in “Home Alone.”

The premise of conflict between Hutch’s commitment to his family and the roiling rage that makes him good at killing plays out well as it echoes with his father, brother, and son, thanks to a strong script by Derek Kolstad and Aaron Rabin and a fine performance by Odenkirk. It’s easy to overlook how good he is because of all that is happening on screen, but it would just be cartoonish without Odenkirk’s ability to make us understand Hutch’s layers of emotion. It’s nice to get a glimpse of Becca’s side of things. She gets to be much more than the usual “Oh, honey, don’t do anything scary or dangerous” female role, making us wish for a prequel to fill in the details behind her story about how they met.

Parents should know that this is an exceptionally violent film with guns, knives, fire, and explosions. Many characters are injured and killed and there are many graphic and disturbing images. Characters are criminals who deal in drugs and bombs. Characters use strong language, drink and get drunk. There is some marital kissing and mild sexual references.

Family discussion: What are the parallels in the stories of the father-son relationships of Hutch, Brady, and David and Henry and Max? In what way to David, Hutch, and Henry want their sons to be better than they are?

If you like this, try: the first film and “Shoot-Em Up”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Crime movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Series/Sequel
The Fantastic Four: First Steps

The Fantastic Four: First Steps

Posted on July 22, 2025 at 12:19 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for action/violence and some language
Profanity: Brief mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: Extended comic book/action-style peril and violence, some graphic images
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: July 25, 2025

Four seems to be the magic number. After three unsatisfactory tries at getting Marvel’s cosmic ray-enhanced superheroes on screen, Marvel Studios got it right, gorgeously produced, well cast, gracefully relegating the origin story to a few “archival” clips, and putting our quartet and us right in the middle of the action.

It is set in a fantasy version of the 1960s, inspired by the visual style, not the history or pop culture. In the first scene, Reed is looking for iodine, the painful antiseptic used for minor cuts in the 50s, and Sue Storm uses something that was not invented in our reality until the 1980s. There is a Calder mobile in their headquarters living room and the men we see in the outdoor scenes all wear hats, so handsome this movie just might bring back the fedora. The production design from “Loki’s” Kasra Farahani is dazzling and endlessly inviting, a heightened version of a mid-century concept of the future. The cerulean blue and white accents of the retro F4 uniforms designed by Alexandra Byrne (“Guardians of the Galaxy”) place us in a time and a world that is like but not the same as ours.

Copyright 2025 Marvel Studios

The Four are Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal), a brilliant scientist whose body stretches, his wife Sue (Vanessa Kirby) who has the power of invisibility, including creating invisible shields, Sue’s impetuous and very single brother Johnny (Joseph Quinn), who can burst into flames and fly, and Ben Grimm, known as The Thing (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), who looks like he is made from mountain rock and is very, very strong.

As the movie begins, the world is celebrating them as heroes and protectors. It has been four years since the space expedition exposed them to the cosmic rays, they have defeated or, in the case of the subterranean Mole Man (Paul Walter Hauser), negotiated a peace agreement, and established a United Nations-type organization called the Future Foundation.

The superheroes and the people they protect believe F4 and their adorable robot, Herbie, will always keep them safe. And then they face their biggest and most terrifying challenge. Sue is pregnant. While Reed and Sue know that the molecular changes from the cosmic rays may affect the baby, they believe, with some reassurance from Sue’s ability to make her abdomen invisible so they can see the fetus, the baby will be fine.

Big and terrifying challenge #2: the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) arrives to announce that Earth is about to be consumed by Galactus (Ralph Ineson), a planet devourer. F4 tracks the Silver Surfer to find Galactus, confident they can defeat him. And this leads to the first Marvel action sequence that features a very pregnant superhero. Galactus offers them a terrible choice, and when they refuse, the people on earth quickly go from fans to haters.

The film moves briskly, with one of the shortest run times in the MCU, under two hours. But it creates a fully-realized world, with small details like the Mole Man’s dad jokes, Ben Grimm’s “beard” and copy of 50s classic child care bible Dr. Spock, and a sweet brief appearance by Natasha Lyonne as the teacher of students who are big fans of The Thing. Fans will enjoy some glimpses of popular villains from the comic books. Director Matt Shakman (the similarly retro fantasies “Game of Thrones” and “Wandavision” and “The Great”) understands that the action scenes and the family dynamic are central to the storyline and he has fun with scale when Galactus arrives. While the stakes are dire, he stays away from gratuitous carnage. The film has good-natured humor, impressive special effects, some tender moments, and even a light gloss of commentary on what we expect from our heroes, and how we approach moral dilemmas and life-threatening challenges. I’m iffy about one twist, but overall, this is a film that respects comic book characters and what we love about them.

Parents should know that this movie features extended comic book/action-style peril and violence, with some scary creatures and disturbing and graphic images. There are mild references to reproductive biology and a woman goes into labor (discreetly filmed). Characters use some mild language.

Family discussion: Philosopher Jeremy Bentham argued that all decisions should be based on the greatest good for the largest number of people. How does that idea appear in this film and do you agree? What do you think will happen to Franklin? What is the law of levers and how do you see it around you?

If you like this, try: “Superman,” The Fantastic Four comics, and maybe just for fun watch the earlier films so you can compare them.

NOTE: Stay through the credits for one extra scene indicating where the story is going and, at the very end, a nostalgic moment.

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Fantasy IMAX movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Remake Scene After the Credits Series/Sequel Superhero
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2025, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik