Lone Survivor

Posted on January 9, 2014 at 6:00 pm

lone survivorDirector Peter Berg is as good as it gets when it comes to putting a particular kind of male chemistry on screen. If he was writing instead of filming, he would dunk his pen in testosterone, beard stubble, and sweat.  Whether it is the small town Texas football community of “Friday Night Lights,” the disastrous bachelor party of “Very Bad Things,” or the aliens and explosions of the under-rated “Battleship,” Berg understands the rhythms of guy-talk that circles around the still core of pure masculinity. There are nearly as many f-words per minute in this film as in the record-breaking “Wolf of Wall Street.” But there the language was used to show off, to convey bravado, for shock and awe. Here the heirs to a long tradition of colorful military argot almost have air quotes around the language. It’s almost a mirror image; on Wall Street, they use bad words to seem tougher. These Navy Seals use bad language with irony — they know that no words can be as tough as they really are or express what they have really seen and done. For them, the inadequacy of even the most provocative language is the joke.

This is the true story of a disastrous Navy SEAL mission in Afghanistan, based on the book Lone Survivor: The Eyewitness Account of Operation Redwing and the Lost Heroes of SEAL Team 10 by Marcus Luttrell. We know from the title and from the earliest moments of the movie that Luttrell, played by Mark Wahlberg, will be the only one still around at the end of the movie.  And so, we steel ourselves, knowing we will spend just enough time with the characters to become attached to them before they are sent off on a doomed mission to take out a ‘bad guy” in Afghanistan and start getting killed.

As in most military dramas, real and fictional, there are archetypal characters.  There’s a new addition and a hardened vet.  And there is Luttrell, a medic, a witness, like Ishmael in Moby Dick the survivor who carries the stories of the others with him.

This is not “action violence,” with super-effective weapons on our side and endless just-misses from the enemy, along with exciting explosions and instant death.  This is messy, dirty, blood-gushing and agonizing wartime violence.  Berg pays tribute to these men by showing us that their courage, dedication, and skill were unparalleled and the tragic stupidity of war presented them with a series of awful choices and unthinkable danger.  At one point, when they have been spotted by (apparent) civilians, including a young boy, they stand there and discuss their options — let them go and risk having them tell the enemy where they are, tie them up and risk having them die of predators or starvation, or kill them, preserving the mission but putting into question the larger issues, from what happens when it gets reported on CNN and what we are fighting for if that is who we’ve become.  That may be the most heartbreaking moment of the film — until the end, when we see the real faces of the brave young men who died.  They knew what they owed us.  Perhaps this movie will help remind us what we owe them.

Parents should know that this movie includes constant wartime peril and violence with many characters injured and killed, children in peril, guns, explosions.  There are very disturbing and graphic images of characters being hit with bullets, many sad deaths, as well as constant very strong and sometimes crude language.

Family discussion: What elements of the training and briefings were important to helping the SEALS do their job?  What more did they need? Who was right in the discussion of what to do when they were “compromised” in being spotted by civilians?

If you like this, try: “Act of Valor,” with real-life Navy SEALS playing fictional versions of themselves and “We Were Soldiers,” about the early days of the American involvement in the Vietnam War.

 

 

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Based on a true story War

1976: Hunt vs. Lauda

Posted on January 7, 2014 at 5:00 am

huntlaudaRon Howard’s “Rush” was the story of the Formula One rivalry between the reckless and handsome James Hunt from Great Britain and the cool, hyper-rational Niki Lauda from Austria. In the extraordinary season of 1976, Lauda was in a terrible racing accident, with burns and injuries so severe he was read the last rites. But he was back on the racetrack 42 days later. The parts of that movie that were the hardest to believe were the parts that really happened. And now, a very fine documentary, 1976: Hunt vs Lauda, lets the people who were there tell the story.

Grittier than the Hollywood version but with the perspective of those who have had some time to think about what happened, this is a fascinating look at two men who had utterly different personalities but were alike in the single most important aspect of their characters — their love for going faster than anyone else was so profound that they were not only willing to risk death to win the race; they positively relished it.  Just as interesting are the men who sponsored them.  It is one thing to risk your own life.  It is another to urge someone else to risk his.  There is a chilling moment when the Ferrari team manager says crisply, “If Niki will not drive, Ferrari will not stop….A driver is very much replaceable.”  The team managers are as important a part of the story as the drivers and the allegations of activities that may not constitute cheating but still qualify as unfair.  Lauda, his face scarred and his head turned away to hide the damaged ear, is frank about the moment when even his nerves of steel wavered for a moment.  He tells the story of a man who asked him for the last autograph he gave before his crash.  But there was something unusual about the request — he wanted Lauda to add the date “because it could be the last one.”  So, it is the audience as well as the managers and the advertisers and the drivers who are a part of this system.

Parents should know that this is the real-life story of one man who relished the excess of the 70’s, with lots of girls and substance abuse and another who survived a catastrophic racing accident.  The film includes some graphic images of the crash and the driver’s injuries.

Family discussion: How does this version differ from the feature film?  What makes someone want to race?  Do you agree with Lauda’s decision?  Should they change the rules to make racing safer?

If you like this, try: “Rush” and car racing films like “Le Mans” and “Heart Like a Wheel’

 

 

 

 

Related Tags:

 

Documentary Sports

The “Veronica Mars” Movie Trailer Looks Great!

Posted on January 3, 2014 at 11:12 am

The Kickstarter-financed update to the beloved television series looks wonderful — a great combination of letting the main character grow up (she’s a lawyer now) but giving her a reason to go home and interact with the characters from her high school days.  Well done!

Related Tags:

 

Based on a television show Trailers, Previews, and Clips
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2026, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik