Turbo

Posted on July 16, 2013 at 6:00 pm

B+
Lowest Recommended Age: Kindergarten - 3rd Grade
MPAA Rating: Rated PG for some mild action and thematic elements
Profanity: None
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: Cartoon peril, characters injured, minor snall characters eaten by birds
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: July 19, 2013
Date Released to DVD: November 12, 2013
Amazon.com ASIN: B008JFUR92

Who declared this the summer of the animated snails? In Twentieth Century Fox’s “Epic,” a snail and slug duo stole the spotlight from the human characters, even the Beyoncé-voiced nature queen.   The end credits of Pixar’s “Monsters University” features not the movie’s main characters but a cute snail coda.  And now DreamWorks'”Turbo,” one of this year’s best family films, gives racing snails center stage in a story that puts the “go” in escargot.turbo

Ryan Reynolds is Theo, a garden snail who knows to the bottom of his snail-y soul that there is only one thing that will make him happy: “terrifying, terrifying, blazing speed.”  He longingly watches car races on an old VCR, imagining that he is racing alongside French-Canadian Indy 500 champion Guy Gagné (Bill Hader).  When Guy proclaims from the winner’s circle that “no dream is too beeeg and no dreamer is too small,” Theo feels that the message is meant just for him.

But that dream seems far away.  Theo and his very cautious older brother Chet (Paul Giamatti) work at the plant.  Literally.  It is a tomato plant, with an intricate series of conveyer belts to deliver the fresh tomatoes to the snails.  Theo is in charge of rotten tomatoes (possibly a gentle swipe at the popular movie review website of that name) and there is an amusing series of shots with Theo getting repeatedly hit by squishy, overripe fleshy fruit.

Theo gets exposed to a chemical accelerant that hits him like the radioactive spider-bite hit Peter Parker.  When Tito (Michael Peña), half-owner of the Dos Bros taco stand, enters him in a snail race, he zooms across the finish line and changes his name to Turbo to fit his new identity.  Tito and his strip mall neighbors, proprietors of a hobby shop, a nail salon, and a garage, trick up Turbo with a snazzy shell cover and enter him into the Indy 500 race, where, it turns out, you don’t need to have a car, you just need to be fast.  Turbo will be racing against his idol, Guy Gagné.

The movie, it must be said, gets a bit slow in the middle, with too much time spent on the human characters. The economic struggles of the human strip mall denizens are dreary and under-written compared to the big dreams of the little snail. The effort to create a parallel in the strain between the taco-selling brothers of Dos Bros and those of the snail brothers, one adventuresome, one risk-averse,  is labored.

But it picks up every time the racing snails come back on screen, thanks to the adorable character design, with very expressive use of those googly eyes at the end of their antennae, and especially to the voice talent.  Reynolds’ Turbo has a lot of heart and gives a nicely dry twist to lines like, “Let me get my calendar, so I can time you.”  The stand-outs are Giamatti as the perpetually worried but caring Chet and the indispensable Samuel L. Jackson as Whiplash, a racing snail who leads Turbo’s hilarious pit crew.  He’s the snail who has “the skills to pay the bills,” if snails had bills to pay, that is.  “Your trash talk is needlessly complicated,” he crisply advises another racer.  Just hearing Jackson say “I’m going to preTEND I didn’t hear you say that,” coming from the mouth of a snail with a toy race car chassis over his shell, gives the same boost to the movie that the jolt of nitrous gives to Turbo.

Parents should know that this film has some cartoon-style peril and violence, with minor characters getting eaten by birds and hit by a car.

Family discussion:  What do you think separates the ordinary from the extraordinary?  What is your one thing that makes you happy and how will you follow your dream?

If you like this, try: the forthcoming “Turbo” television series and the Pixar classic, “A Bug’s Life”

 

Related Tags:

 

3D Animation DVD/Blu-Ray Pick of the Week Talking animals

Pacific Rim

Posted on July 11, 2013 at 6:00 pm

Pacific-Rim-02I know there’s only one question you have about this movie, and the answer is yes.  If you ever wanted to see a movie with giant monsters battling giant robots, this is it.

And if you ever wanted to see a movie that is nothing but giant monsters battling giant robots, this is that movie.

Not much more to say after that.  And thankfully, director Guillermo del Toro understands that.  I don’t remember ever seeing a movie that gets to the point so quickly.  Less than a minute into the running time there’s a monster attacking a city and cars falling off a bridge and moments later, we get, you guessed it, a monster fighting a robot.  And it’s pretty much monsters and robots from then on.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.  These are some mighty fine monsters and robots.

So, here’s the deal.  There are monsters.  We don’t know where they came from but they arrive through some sort of “Thor”-like portal under the Pacific Ocean. Its cheeky conceit is that the dinosaurs were a sort of failed advance team and the monsters had to wait until humans evolved and deteriorated the environment until it was Goldilocks-just-right for them.

These are very, very big monsters known by the Japanese term “kaiju.” Del Toro loves monsters, and these are absolutely fantastic.  Like Ray Harryhausen, del Toro and his character design team understand that we need monsters to be at the same time very strange and very familiar, impossible but possible.  The structure of bone and muscle and teeth has to make sense to us.  They have to be able to support their frames and their movements have to feel weighty and powerful.  These monsters are masterfully designed, marvelous and scary.  There are blue, glowing tentacles and massive jaws with pointed teeth.  They attack cities like Godzilla’s gigantic brother, stomping and chomping.

What’s cool here is the sheer scale of the things.  Over and over, it take your breath away.

At first, the humans think it is a one-time attack.  But then there are others.  And the earth has to recalibrate all notions of what is possible, all priorities.  They have to find a way to fight the kaiju.  They have to build robots the size of the Empire State Building.

The robots look great, with ninja heads and believable scuffs and dents.  Some of what they do does not seem physically possible — how does that running and jumping thing work? — but mostly their movements seem to make sense and feel believably powerful and weighty.  What goes on inside, not so much.  We can build robots the size of a skyscraper but the arms and legs have to be operated manually, like a kind of gym stair-stepper?  And what is this mumbo-jumbo about how the pairs who operate them have to be able to “drift” — meld their neural pathways so they can access each other’s thoughts?  Oh, well, let’s get to the fights!

Charlie Day provides some comic relief without going overboard as a nerdy scientist.  Ron Pearlman shows up as a colorful profiteer.  He goes overboard, but that’s what he’s there for.  Idris Elba gets to use his real accent for once, is majestic as the guy in charge.  Charlie Hunnam, bulked up, fades into the background, more generic than the machines.  Whenever they try to add some human interest, everything stalls, but fortunately that does not happen too often.

There are a couple of good touches about the way different elements of civilization respond to the monsters.  I couldn’t really understand who was doing what some of the time or what they were saying much of the time (a lot of the usual sci-fi moments of people staring intently into monitors, but it is always nice to Clifton Collins, Jr., and he does better with the jargon than most people).  But there were robots fighting monsters and in the middle of the summer, that’s good enough for me.

NOTE: Be sure to stay halfway through the credits for an extra scene.

Parents should know that this film has non-stop and intense sci-fi action violence with massive destruction and genocide, very scary monsters, chases, explosions, suicide missions, gruesome images, sad deaths, brief language

Family discussion: Why didn’t Staker want Mako to go out in the Jaeger? How is the cooperation between Gottleib and Geiszler like the drifting of the Jaeger operators? What are three different ways we saw characters respond to the attacks?

If you like this, try: “Independence Day,” “Top Gun,” “Blade Runner,” and the original “Godzilla”

Related Tags:

 

3D Action/Adventure Science-Fiction

Charade

Posted on July 8, 2013 at 8:00 am

A
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: NR
Profanity: Mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking, smoking
Violence/ Scariness: Peril and violence, characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: 1963
Date Released to DVD: July 8, 2013
Amazon.com ASIN: B00COHGPNS

I’m delighted that one of the all-time great romantic thrillers is being released for the first time on Blu-Ray this week.  Director Stanley Donen out-Hitchcock’s Alfred Hitchcock with this witty, elegant, sophisticated bonbon starring Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant.  It has a swoony score by Henry Mancini and a nicely twisty plot.  And one of the most delicious last lines in movie history.

Hepburn plays a Parisian woman whose estranged husband is murdered and thrown off a train.  She realizes she knew very little about him.  And she realizes some very bad people knew a lot about him.  When he was in the army, he and some of his friends stole some money.  And then he stole it from them.  They are after the money, and that means they are after her.

I won’t spoil any surprises by saying more.  But I will strongly recommend that after you watch the movie, you watch it again to listen to the commentary from director Stanley Donen and screenwriter Peter Stone, filled with marvelously entertaining anecdotes about the making of the film.  I love the story about Cary Grant’s haircut.  My favorite part, though, is whenever a close-up of Audrey Hepburn comes on the screen.  They just pause.  And then one of them says, a little breathlessly, “Isn’t she beautiful?”

Yes, she is.

charade-splsh

Related Tags:

 

Classic Crime Date movie DVD/Blu-Ray Pick of the Week Mystery Romance

The Lone Ranger

Posted on July 7, 2013 at 11:32 pm

C
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence, and some suggestive material
Profanity: Some mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Scenes in bar
Violence/ Scariness: Extensive action-style violence, some graphic, many deaths and injuries
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie but some insensitivity to racial differences
Date Released to Theaters: July 4, 2013
Amazon.com ASIN: B008JFUOC2

lone rangerFor more than a century the movies have been telling us the story of America through westerns, and each decade gets the version it deserves.  We have seen films range from the optimistic, heroic, and racially insensitive movies of the 40’s (“Destry Rides Again,” “My Darling Clementine”) to the more politically metaphoric movies of the cold war era (“High Noon,” “The Ox-Bow Incident”) to the subversive 60’s (“Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” “Cat Ballou”), to the bleakness of spaghetti westerns and the Oscar-winning “Unforgiven.”

And now, 110  years after Edwin S. Porter’s “Great Train Robbery” (considered the first movie western), we get an update on the radio show-turned television series-turned forgettable 1981 movie version starring model-almost-turned-actor Klinton Spilsbury and Michael Horse, “The Lone Ranger.”  And it is indeed a reflection on the era of Citizens United and squestration.  It is the very essence of soulless corporate excess and celebrity self-regard.

The folks behind “Pirates of the Caribbean” have reunited for a reboot of “The Lone Ranger,” but this is more like the overstuffed sequels than the fresh and charming original.  Everything is out of balance in this bloated two and a half-hour endurance challenge.  The worst part is that pared down to lose 40 minutes or so of filler, this could be a nice little action movie.  It has the key ingredients: a story and characters that have stood the test of time, inventive and absorbing action sequences, and talented performers.  Unfortunately, it is hard to find any of that in the midst of all of the bombast and overkill and tooooo many cooks.

It is now well known that Depp became a superstar with his performance as Captain Jack Sparrow in the “Pirates” movies, a performance of such quirk and weirdness that it completely freaked out the suits.  So of course now, with him as producer, they let him do whatever he wanted for the character of Tonto, including spending the entire movie with his face completely painted and wearing a dead crow on his head, inspired by a picture he saw.  This is when the suits should have stepped in.  Instead they were enablers, allowing the quirks to become distracting and unpleasant.  That is especially true in a completely unnecessary framing story set in 1933, with Depp in old man make-up appearing in an old west display, telling a little kid dressed as the Lone Ranger his story.

Armie Hammer does his best in a thankless role.  His John Reid is part James Stewart in “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” (bookish lawyer who wants to bring Lockeian notions of a civil society to the west), part doofus.  He isn’t as smart as Tonto or the villains, which is fine, but he isn’t as smart as his horse, either.  He isn’t as smart as the blanket under his saddle, except when he is, or when he is called upon to do crazy stunts like racing the snow-white “spirit horse” across the top of a racing train, shooting his gun as he goes.  He is a fine actor with a strong screen presence and he is clearly game.  He deserves better.

The many, many references to other movies seem like crutches, not tributes.  The many, many anachronisms are sloppy and show contempt for the audience, not meta-commentary.  People in 1869 did not say “Let’s do this.”  They did not eat hot dogs in buns with ketchup.  The “Star Spangled Banner” did not become the national anthem until 1931. There was no such thing as “health code violations” in a bar — or a house of prostitution.  And the all-purpose conspiracy that has the military, a hostile takeover, and an outlaw feels desperate and generic.  Any commentary on today’s economic and political woes is purely coincidental.

The real commentary on the failures of capitalism is in spending $250 million of the Disney shareholders’ money on this uninspired vanity project.

Parents should know that this film has intense and graphic violence for a PG-13.  A villain literally eats the heart of a man he has murdered and there is massive slaughter, with many characters injured and killed.  There are prostitutes, a cross-dresser, bathroom humor, some alcohol, and mild language.

Family discussion:  Why did Tonto feed the crow?  Why was trading so important to him?  Read the Lone Ranger’s creed and discuss how it applies to your life.

If you like this, try: “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance,” “Silverado,” “Cat Ballou,” and “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid”

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure Based on a television show Comedy Drama Movies -- format Remake Western

Kevin Hart: Let Me Explain

Posted on July 6, 2013 at 3:28 pm

hart_kevin-movie-explain-625xKevin Hart’s new stand-up movie is short (about 75 minutes).  And, as he will repeatedly remind you, so is he.

There’s a brief prologue where guests at a rooftop party accuse him of not being in touch with his father, having sex only with light-skinned women, and both being only locally famous and being so successful that he is no longer real.  Furious, he tells his manager to get him to the Garden immediately.  “The Olive Garden?” the man responds.  No, Madison Square Garden!  Kevin Hart has some things he wants to get off his chest.  Let him explain!

Like all great stand-up comics, Hart is a master of timing and can make all of the roles in a story with a slight but astonishingly vivid shift in his face, voice, and posture.  Like Dane Cook and Tyler Perry, Hart is a master of viral marketing and branding.  Under the radar of the Hollywood machine, he has become the top touring stand-up, as he takes pains to show us with a global montage of venues, many enormous and all sold out.  He may be able to stand on a street corner and plaintively explain that no one there seems to know who he is.  But his millions of YouTube followers are devoted fans, and when he shows up, whether it’s London, Amsterdam, or Oslo, they are there.Kevin-Hart-Let-Me-Explain

And then it’s New York, and the Garden.  He is excited to be there, and he brings the fire.  Literally.  He thought it was cool when Jay-Z and Kanye had fire on stage, so he gets some big fire and has it flame on every now and then to punctuate a punch-line — or just to be a punch-line, as we enjoy his enjoyment of the pretentiousness and pointlessness (but coolness) of fire on stage.

Stand-up is the toughest job in the performing arts. It’s you and the microphone.  No script, no other performer to cue or toss to, no hit song to get the audience applauding after just one chord.  It’s 30,000 people and you and your stories.

In this case, the stories are mainly in the “b****es be crazy” category.  He begins by telling us he is happily divorced, which is great because he can do things like feed the pigeons without anyone suspecting he is a liar.  Then he tells us he is a liar, but seems to think it is irrational for a woman to find that upsetting.  Women, on the other hand, are not under any circumstances allowed to cheat.  And friends — they are there to back you up, and when you begin the phone call with “Don’t lie,” that means, well: “LIE.”

Unlike the all-time greats, Chris Rock, George Carlin, and even Bill Cosby, Hart never goes past the “funny thing happened to me” line of comedy, which is entertaining enough, in large part because he sees his flaws.  But you get the sense, especially in story about his son and a final comment about how much it means to him to be there, that there’s more to him.  Now that he’s explained, maybe the next tour can be, “No Longer Safe.”

Parents should know that this movie is filled with profanity, n-words, and crude sexual references.

Family discussion: How do Hart’s expectations for the women in his life differ from what he expects from himself? Did he make the right decision in the story about his son? What do we learn about him from the opening scene?

If you like this, try: Hart’s “Laugh at My Pain” and the stand-up comedy of Chris Rock and Richard Pryor

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Documentary
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2026, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik