The Way Way Back

Posted on July 5, 2013 at 9:12 pm

B+
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, language, some sexual content, and brief drug material
Profanity: Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking and drunkenness, drug reference
Violence/ Scariness: Emotional confrontations
Diversity Issues: Insensitive treatment of a person with a disability
Date Released to Theaters: July 5, 2013
Date Released to DVD: October 21, 2013
Amazon.com ASIN: B00DL46ZN8

THE WAY, WAY BACKNat Faxon and Jim Rash, Oscar winners for the screenplay of “The Descendants,” have written, produced, and directed an endearing coming-of-age story called “The Way Way Back,” appearing in it as well. At times it seems there have been as many movies of the summer that changed some adolescent’s life as there have been adolescents to face the daunting challenges of growing up. It is a daunting challenge, as well, to make this story fresh and meaningful, but Faxon, Rash, and their exceptionally capable cast have managed, with a story that is specific enough to feel new but universal enough to hit home.

Liam James plays Duncan, who gives the movie’s title its double resonance as we first see him, facing the back window of an old station wagon driven by his mother’s new boyfriend, riding in the “way back.”  We can feel everything he knows, everything that feels like home and welcome and normal to him receding into the distance.  He’s looking back.

Trent (Steve Carell), the boyfriend, in the driver’s seat, is looking back, too.  He is sizing Duncan up in a primal urge to establish Duncan’s mother, Pam (Toni Collette), as his territory.  We see his eyes in the rear view mirror.  The tone is friendly, avuncular, even paternal but the words are devastating.  He asks Duncan how it rates himself on a scale of one to ten.  When Duncan ventures a six, Trent tells him he’s a three.  And he expects Duncan to use his time at the beach house to “get that score up.”

Duncan is in teen hell.  And his mother’s happiness makes him feel at the same time happy for her and fury and isolation at her inability to see that Trent is a bully and a liar.

THE WAY, WAY BACKThen one day Duncan wanders off and finds a water park called Water Wizz, where he meets an amiable slacker of a manager named Owen (Sam Rockwell).  Soon, he is working there.  He’s found his home.

It would be so easy to mess this up.  Trent could be a caricature. Owen could be idealized.  But Faxon and Rash wisely let us understand that we are seeing both of them in slightly exaggerated form through Duncan’s eyes.  We know that Trent is not as bad nor Owen as good as Duncan thinks they are.  Duncan sees Trent as a liar and a cheat, but does not see him struggle to deserve a woman like Pam.  Duncan sees Owen as a courageous free spirit.  Owen loves being seen that way, but he knows and we know that he is irresponsible and ashamed of his life.  Faxon and Rash, who contribute their own performances of wit and heart, make the movie a safe place for us as Water Wizz is for Duncan.

Parents should know that this film includes drinking, smoking, strong language, drug use, sexual references, infidelity, and bullying.

Family discussion: What did Pam and Trent see in each other? How do the various children and teens in this story respond when they cannot find support and understanding at home? What other stories are examples of this?

If you like this, try: “Little Miss Sunshine” and “Adventureland” (both rated R)

Related Tags:

 

Comedy Coming of age Drama DVD/Blu-Ray Pick of the Week Stories about Teens Teenagers

Interview: Jim Rash and Nat Faxon of “The Way Way Back”

Posted on July 3, 2013 at 3:59 pm

the-way-way-backNat Faxon and Jim Rash won a screenwriting Oscar for “The Descendants” and won the next day’s headlines by imitating Angelina Jolie’s leg-out pose when they accepted it.  I talked to them about “The Way Way Back,” which they wrote, produced, directed, and appear in as actors.  It is a coming of age story about a 14-year-old boy named Duncan (Liam James), reluctantly staying at a summer home on the beach with his mother, Pam (Toni Collette), and her new boyfriend, Trent (Steve Carell).  To get out of the house, he takes a job at a local water park, where he is befriended by the manager (Sam Rockwell as Owen).  Faxon and Rash play some of the other employees.  I talked to them about casting Steve Carell as a bad guy, using Spotify to find songs for the film, what acting has taught them about directing, and the very important task they forgot on the first day.

Do all teenagers look for a new family?

NF: You’re always saying, “I don’t belong here! Where is someone who understands me?” We all go through that.

JR: Except me! My family was perfect. (Laughs)

What do we look for?

NF: We think there’s something better, someone who’s not going to tell us what to do. We hope there’s always going to be a cheerleader who will give us independence. And then we realize — hopefully — that the place we were in was good for us in the long run.

Adolescence is such an excruciating time of life and yet we keep being drawn to those stories.

JR: The vulnerability that you have at that age, the innocence that is transforming, a rite of passage, becoming more of a free-thinker, more opinionated about what your views are and what you like and don’t like as emblems of who you are — there’s something very relatable and very honest in that transition time. With the help of someone else or on your own, you’re making that leap and that’s universal no matter where you come from.

NF: And once you’ve been through it, you have a context, and you can look back and remember it and understand more than you could when it was happening. You’re endeared to these characters pretty instantly because you know exactly what this is.

Who thinks of nicest-guy-in-the-world Steve Carell as a bad guy who is a liar and a bully? Where does that come from?

NF: We went against type for a lot of reasons and he came to mind pretty fast. Steve’s character, Trent, is difficult. He’s a jerk, but he’s more complicated than that. He’s a tragic male character, stuck in a cycle. But we needed that innate likability. His girlfriend, Pam , where she is right now, she is scared, so she needs to see the attractiveness in this protection he offers. We see him with his friends. We see what he’s like with them, and how he is appealing. We needed an actor who understood that Trent’s not on a typical arc of change. He’s in a circle of non-change. Some people who have seen it a second time start to feel some sympathy for him. Not that they want to hang around him, more like, “I hope you get better,” or “I hope you wake up.” He’s also needed for Duncan and Pam to allow them to have this moment of awakening. So Steve was perfect because he embraced that.

And Steve Carell was probably thrilled to play a role like this.

NF: He wrote us a very nice note saying that he loved the script. And then there was this phrase…

JR: He said, “I love this, but, lest I become a Trent to my own family, I have to decline.” We were shooting during the summer and he spends a lot of time on the east coast with his family. He didn’t want to be on location away from them. So we wrote back and said, “What if we shoot where you’ll be?”

That’s how you found your location?

JR: And so he said all right. We were originally planning North Carolina, which is where I’m from. But the East Coast experience is the East Coast experience. East Coast destination vacations are completely different to me than West Coast, where we are now. We were like, “We can shoot in your back yard.”

NF: We lucked out in terms of locations. We were so fortunate because our scouting literally took one day. We had two locations that were central in the movie, the water park and the house. We found one in the morning and one in the afternoon. We wanted the place to feel local and not one of these enormous, corporate, Six Flag-y type water parks. We also didn’t want it to be so sad and pathetic that you would never go there. It had to be fun and sort of Oz for our movie. And this place really exists, it’s really named Water Wizz, off of Route 28, and it really is a family-owned establishment. It’s the perfect size, it’s the perfect look, it had everything that we needed. We shot there while the park was open, and so a lot of those people were just water park go-ers.

What have you learned as actors that helps you work with actors as directors?THE WAY, WAY BACK

NF: Because we know this material and we are actors and have had the fortune to work with good directors, we know that for actors it is nice to talk about the character, what makes them this way. There are directors who are more technical. We are more about how we know the script, we know the intent, we know the performance, we know actors. We put that angle on it, and we try to keep those conversations with the actors about that. These people are fantastic. All you need is to give them any kind of clarity about what is happening now, what’s it about, where we are in the story. And then you just let them have a little free reign to explore that. And we’re all in a tight time line, so we have to do it in four takes! Some of these bigger movies, they’re shooting two pages a day, and so that’s different — we have to shoot six to make our time line. And we had a lot of one set-ups, maybe two set-ups. We had walks along the beach that was basically one shot, sitting and waiting for Trent at one point, all in one shot. So we did a lot of those for time and for the aesthetic of feeling in the moment, feeling that we’re voyeurs, eavesdropping on this moment. Both creative and logistic decisions.

JR: Trying not to micro-manage, letting the actors trust their instincts, trying not to over-note them. That’s something that feels more comfortable when you’re not thinking about the twelve things the director just told you but just one or two adjustments that might help.

What guided you as first-time directors with camera placement and all the technical stuff? Who influenced you?

NF: Being first-time directors, it was important for us to surround ourselves with very experienced, talented department heads, like our Director of Cinematography, John Bailey, whose list of films is incomparable.  We had a lot of discussions with him about the look and feel — that was something we could speak very confidently about.  It’s important while Duncan is in the house that he feel very isolated and claustrophobic.  What’s the best cinematic way to achieve that?  Should we put the camera down low to feel a little bit of the closing in?  Then when we get to the water park it would be great to have it more open and fluid and vast and colorful, use steadicam more.  When it got super-technical, lenses and all that, we would just say, “That looks great!”  “You got it!”  That’s the benefit of having someone like John Bailey, who you can trust with all of the little, important, specifics.

And you worked with one of the greats in costume design!

JR: The legend, Ann Roth.

NF: Our producer had worked with her on “The Hours” and a bunch of other movies.  He reached out and she read the script and she loved it and wanted to be a part of it.  We were so incredibly fortunate.  You don’t have to work with her to know what a legend she is, and to work with her is really fun because she is such an incredible personality and you want to spend as much time with her as possible.

JR: Just for the soundbites!

NF: She is brutally honest and she wants you to be brutally honest but terrifies you!  The actresses showed up and it was fantastic.  We would talk about the characters and as soon as they knew it was Ann Roth, they said, “Fine.  She’ll tell me what to wear.”  They trust her so completely.  That type of care and confidence.

She’s so intimidating.  She had an idea for a shirt for Duncan in the opening scene.  In our eyes it felt slightly too Midwestern, maybe like a farm boy look.  I worked up the courage to say, “Ann, I just want to let you know, we might want to go another way with the shirt, look at some other choices….”  and she goes, “All right…” and calls the co-designer, Michelle Matland, and says, “THE DIRECTOR DOES NOT LIKE THE SHIRT.  THE SHIRT WILL NOT PLAY!!”  And I was like, “I’m so sorry!  Is that okay?”  “I PREFER THAT YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU WANT.”  She’s very intimidating, but very collaborative.  She wants to know what your opinion is and respects you more if you are able to tell you that.

JR: She was so excited because the pants Allison is wearing the first time you meet her, these tight pants with a rodeo on it, she has been trying to get that into a movie forever.  Shirley MacLaine wore them many many many years ago, and she’d been saving them.  She pulled them right out and did not miss a beat.

NF: She is a love and a joy to work with and so is Michelle, who is a wonderful counter-balance.

I thought the music was exceptionally well chosen, too.

JR: We had Linda Cohen. We were on a budget and music is not cheap.  We wanted to make sure the film had a cross-section of music to represent both the characters  — Trent probably had CDs he left at the beach house year after year — and we needed some more modern stuff for the water park, with a blend of what Owen would love.  Imagine his Shuffle.  We wanted to make sure it had a timeless feeling.  When you’re a kid at first your taste relates to your parents’ music, and then it evolves.  We had to get creative.  Linda sent us tons of great music and sometimes we would put bands we loved into Spotify and that’s how two songs came, from Trampled by Turtles and The Apache Relay.

NF: My father-in-law is this legendary drummer, Steve Gadd, and he knows an incredible amount of artists.  I said, “if there’s anybody you can think of, we’d love your help in any possible way.”  He had been playing with Edie Brickell and he made the connection.  She watched the movie and really liked it and wanted to be a part of it.  She sent us song after song after song for ideas for the movie.  She was so sweet, so collaborative, so creative, an amazing wealth of music.  Two of those songs bookend the movie.  They fit so well and we were so fortunate.

How did you cast yourselves?

NF: We knew we needed a great-looking guy…we played against type, really stretched ourselves.    I was a little stressed out about it to do both.  We didn’t have the technology to make it a little easier, playback, monitors, so you could see what you’re doing.  So it was a bit of a challenge.  But we started writing together because we wanted to write parts for ourselves that Hollywood had decided we didn’t play.  Not these particular roles, but it was frustrating because you go through these fazes with casting and movies, any actor, even a star.  It’s really upon you to say, “No, no, I can do other things.”  Sometimes you have to fight to audition for those things and hopefully you can prove that you’re right.  Even though this is not exactly an example of that, that was our intention.  It’s important for us always nurture the performers in ourselves.   We’ll have smaller parts, and we’ll work cheap, save a few bucks, and we’re pretty easy to work with.

JR: We had rain the first few days and we didn’t have a lot of rain cover in terms of what else we could shoot.  So we sort of pushed our acting debuts in the movie until near the end, but we were forced to do them on the first day because of the rain.  There was one particular moment when we were in a scene and the scene just sort of ended and we’re looking around, “Hmm, somebody’s not saying ‘Cut.'”  then we heard our producer, saying, “Um, cut…?”  And we’re like, “Yes! Cut!”  We had completely forgotten.

Related Tags:

 

Actors Directors Interview Writers

Despicable Me 2

Posted on July 3, 2013 at 10:00 am

Is there more to the story of “Despicable Me” after Gru (Steve Carell) isn’t despicable anymore? Despicable-Me-2The original, with Gru and Vector (Jason Segal) as warring super-villains, was one of the best animated films and one of the best family movies of the past several years.  The characters, brilliantly designed by illustration great Carter Goodrich, were a magnificent contrast, Gru all musty gothic and Victorian, with heavy carved wood and hammered metal and Vector all sleek and mid-century Creamsicle colors.  The happy ending had Gru’s heart warming to three adorable orphan girls and saving the day.

With all of that resolved, this movie never quite reaches the emotional resonance of the first, and this edition’s villain (I will try not to give away any surprises that occur after the first third of the film) is not as interesting as Vector, visually or in terms of plot or character.

But it is still wonderfully imaginative and fun, with a masterful use of 3D and breathtaking, precision-timed, action sequences that are both exciting and hilarious.  And there are minions.

The adorable yellow creatures who appear to be made from marshmallow peeps and serve as Gru’s version of ooompa-loompas are even more effective scene-stealers than they were in the first outing, whether wearing a fetching maid uniform, reacting to the taste of a very bad batch of jelly, or suffering the effects of a transforming serum called PX41.  Watch the end credits — they appear to be poised to take over the next chapter.

There are some new characters in this sequel, too, most delightfully Lucy, an agent for the Anti-Villain League who recruits Gru to help her save the world.  She is charmingly voiced by Kristin Wiig (a different accent and a different character from the orphanage director she played in the first movie), and deliciously drawn, with Lucille Ball-red hair and a fearless but charmingly dorky personality.  A local mom keeps trying to fix Gru up with her single friends and the girls want him to try a computer matchmaker.  But it is Lucy who makes him consider for the first time getting over the childhood trauma that made him decide that romance was beyond his ability.  Lucy is adorkable, both coltish and rubber-limbed, cheerily explaining to Gru that he should not announce his weapon until after he uses it, and then demonstrating by singing out “lipstick taser!” as he seizes and jerks on the ground.

Meanwhile, there is a new super-villain to track down.  The Anti-Villain League has traced him or her to the local mall (witty and imaginatively conceived).  So Gru and Lucy go undercover with a cupcake shop called Bake My Day and try to figure out which of the local merchants has the PX41.  This is much more exciting than trying to make an honest living manufacturing jams and jellies, especially after the departure of his long-time aide, Dr. Nefario (Russell Brand), who leaves for evil-er pastures.

In the midst of all this, Gru still has his parental responsibilities, including some worries over oldest daughter Margo (Miranda Cosgrove), who has spotted a cute boy named Antonio (“Kings of Summer’s” Moises Arias), who has Beiberific hair and all the charm of a future Latin lover.

A chase scene that has the minions trying to protect Gru is one of the best action sequences of the year and Gru’s entry into the super-villain’s lair is cleverly designed.   It is fun to see Gru try to manage a 6-year-old’s birthday party (like Steve Martin in “Parenthood,” he has to step in as the entertainment) while redefining himself as a man the girls can trust and respect.  It isn’t the villain who’s his match this time, it’s his partner in non-crime.  While not as liberatingly refreshing as the original, it is still a blast and one of the best family films of the year.

Parents should know that this film has several instances of potty humor and some violence and peril (mostly comic but with weapons and drug-induced personality transformations).  There’s a brief shot of a bare minion tush and a joke about being drunk.

Family discussion: Why was it hard for Gru to tell Lucy how he felt? What “despicable” qualities did Gru have that helped him be a better good guy?

If you like this, try: “Despicable Me” and “Megamind”

Related Tags:

 

3D Action/Adventure Animation Comedy Crime Series/Sequel

Alexander and the Terrible Horrible No Good Very Bad Day — A New Live Action Feature Film

Posted on May 2, 2013 at 3:59 pm

One of our family’s favorite books is the classic Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day by Judith Viorst, with illustrations by Ray Cruz.  We all identify with poor Alexander, who has gum in his hair, loses his marble down the bathtub drain, lima beans for dinner, a trip to the dentist, and the wrong shoes and pajamas.  There have been two nice movie shorts, one live-action, one animated, with songs by “Annie’s” Charles Strouse.  Now, a feature film is in the works from Disney, reportedly with Steve Carell and Jennifer Garner as Alexander’s parents and Lisa Cholodenko co-writing the script.  That all sounds very promising!

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book

The Incredible Burt Wonderstone

Posted on March 14, 2013 at 6:00 pm

Everyone on screen seems to be having a blast, but this story of rival magicians in Las Vegas is not as much fun for the audience.  It wants to pull a rabbit out of a hat, but there’s really nothing there.

Steve Carell plays Burt Wonderstone, who fell in love with doing magic tricks when he was a bullied kid.  His only friend was Anton (Steve Buscemi) who also loved magic, and they developed an act together that led to a very successful run at a Las Vegas hotel owned by Doug Munny (James Gandolfini, nicely showing the thuggishness under the veneer of geniality).   They were headliners.  They had their own theater.  And they had a series of beautiful assistants.  All were given the same blonde wig and all were called Nicole.  The most recent Nicole is Jane (Olivia Wilde).

But the act has gotten stale.  Burt has 70’s hair and is so slick with spray tan it may require slight of hand to keep from sliding out of his clothes.  As for the act, Burt is just phoning it in, waiting for his next empty sexual encounter.  He seems more excited by having the biggest bed in Vegas than by what goes on in it.  And audiences are excited by a new street performer named Steve Gray (Jim Carrey) known as “The Brain Rapist.”  What he does is not magic.  He does a series of dangerous stunts, most of which involves some form of mortification of the flesh.  That card an audience member selected from the deck?  He will slice his cheek open to pull it out, covered in blood but still bearing the name scrawled on it with a Sharpie.  He doesn’t just walk across hot coals; he spends the night on them, barbecuing himself.  “They’re calling him the future of magic,” Munny says.

Burt ends up alone and broke, with no place to live and “in need of rabbit food and birdseed.”  Finding the magic again will require him to break through the years of numbness and self-involvement.

There are a skit’s worth of good moments, mostly about Burt’s arrogance and cluelessness.  When Jane makes dinner for him in her apartment, he offers to clean up, but thinks that means putting the dishes outside her front door.  And Carell has a funny cry.  Carrey captures the faux mysticism of “endurance artists” like David Blaine, but there’s no pay-off in seeing him suffer.  Wilde is underused in the usual endlessly-patient-until-the-time-to-grow-up speech, especially frustrating given the film’s superficial claim to countering the marginalization of female characters.  Even Alan Arkin cannot make interesting the old-time magician who first inspired the young Burt to learn to make things disappear.  What this movie is missing is — magic.

Parents should know that this film includes sexual references and non-explicit situations, crude humor, drinking and drunkenness, scenes in a bar, a bully, comic drug use including drugs surreptitiously given to adults and children, strong language (many s-words, one f-word), and comic but dangerous stunts with graphic injuries.

Family discussion: What went wrong with the act and how did that relate to what went wrong with their friendship? What made Burt change his mind? To audiences really enjoy acts involving physical danger and mutilation? Which trick did you like the best and why?

If you like this, try: a terrific documentary about young magicians called “Make Believe”

Related Tags:

 

Not specified
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2025, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik