How to Train Your Dragon (2025)

Posted on June 15, 2025 at 9:32 pm

Lowest Recommended Age:	4th - 6th Grade
Date Released to Theaters:	June 13, 2025

It may be completely unnecessary but this live action version of the terrific 2010 animated “How to Train Your Dragon” is still a great story. The story is heartwarming, the visuals are exciting, and the themes of courage used for a deeper understanding are still worthy.

I object to the idea that an animated film is just a lesser version until technology develops to create a “live action” remake (the dragons are CGI). Animation has its own artistry, vibrance, and expressiveness. This version is almost a shot-for-shot remake, emphasizing the original’s unsurpassability, yet somehow it is nearly half an hour longer. The original – and its sequels and spin-offs – are so memorable that this remake is like enjoying a cover band version of a classic song more for the memories it evokes of the original than for its own merits.

Our young hero is Hiccup (Mason Thames), the son of single dad and chief Stoick (Gerard Butler, who voiced the same character in the original). They live in Berk, a craggy, stark, unforgiving, and remote Scandinavian community beset by dragons who steal their food. Status is based on killing dragons and many people in the community proudly sport scars and prosthetics to demonstrate their courage in these battles. Stoick, disappointed by his son’s lack of warrior spirit, reminds Hiccup that his mother was killed by a dragon (though those of us who have seen the animated sequels know that she is still alive). Hiccup is apprenticed to Stoick’s best friend Gobber (Nick Frost), whose prosthetic hand and foot are the result of fighting dragons, and who now provides weapons and teaches those teenagers who, unlike Hiccup, are going to be trained to be dragonslayers.

As in the original, the dragons here are wonderfully imagined, with many fascinating species. Each looks different and poses different kinds of threats. While Stoick has taken all of the warriors in search of the dragons’ nest, Hiccup finds and befriends a wounded Night Fury he names Toothless, hiding their relationship from everyone else until they are discovered by Astrid (Nico Parker), the best young warrior trainee. He takes her for a ride on Toothless and she is convinced that dragons are worthy of respect and affection.

Very little has changed in the storyline, as noted. But perhaps 15 years distance has brought some changes in our atmosphere and understanding. For me at least, Stoick’s harsh judgment of Hiccup as weak and fearful because he does not want to cut the heads off of dragons felt like a slightly broader statement about masculinity, hierarchies based on community standards, and fear of the unknown than a father’s distorted but genuine wish to protect his son from creatures that were responsible for so much loss. Perhaps that was just because I know the story so well and thought the padding dragged a little.

Thames portrayal of Hiccup is sincere and he allows us to see the teenager sort through his feelings as he allows curiosity to triumph over tradition. Parker, the daughter of Thandiwe Newton and Ol Parker, is excellent, showing us Astrid’s fierceness and, like Hiccup, the curiosity that leads her to question her community’s assumptions, even though by the standards she was raised with, she is at the top.

Production designer Dominic Watkins skillfully translates the animated world with intricate, textured, settings filled with intriguing details. The ships, the landscape, the workshop, even the doors in the arena that open up to allow dragons to enter for the training sessions area are all gorgeously imagined to bring us into the world. Lindsay Pugh’s costumes and the hair designs by a talented group of artists help define the characters, who dress for battle but show a lot of personality and intention in the way they present themselves. The flying scenes are dynamic, fun to watch, and I’m sure a glimpse at what the new ride at Universal Studios will be like.

Parents should know that this movie has extended peril and violence, though human and dragon deaths are off-screen. We hear about injuries and deaths, including the death of Hiccup’s mother. It also includes a very positive portrayal of people (and a dragon) with disabilities.

Family discussion: Why was Hiccup the first to see that the dragons could be friendly? Why was it hard for his father to accept that?

If you like this try: the animated movies, the books, and the television series

Materialists

Posted on June 15, 2025 at 12:42 pm

B-

Lowest Recommended Age:	High School
MPAA Rating:	Rated R for brief sexual material and language
Profanity:	Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Drinking, smoking
Violence/ Scariness:	None
Diversity Issues:	None
Date Released to Theaters:	June 13, 2025

Writer/director Celine Song has followed up her auspicious debut film, “Past Lives,” with another story about a woman torn between two men, with one who represents her past. In “Past Lives,” the other was her present; in “Materialists” the other represents a future she imagines for herself.

This film is less successful because it never fully integrates the ideas and the characters. Even three of the world’s most charismatic and talented performers cannot manage to make the characters come to life. There are some well-chosen songs on the soundtrack and some provocative ideas. But the tone is inconsistent and the treatment superficial. The themes are worth exploring but are always just out of reach.

Dakota Johnson plays Lucy, a matchmaker to wealthy New Yorkers who are used to buying bespoke and think they can give her a list of “must haves” covering everything from education and bank account to height, hairline, and regular churchgoing. They give her a checklist but she almost always responds by promising them love.

Lucy herself is resolutely single, five years after breaking up with her aspiring actor boyfriend John (Chris Evans), she is working at a company called ADORE, doing what she says is the only job she has ever been good at. Early in the film, she is being celebrated for the wedding of two people she brought together, her ninth successful match.

At that wedding, the bride is having a meltdown over whether to go through with it. Lucy calms her down with a very pragmatic discussion of what she needs from the relationship. We will see that Lucy is more than pragmatic; she is, per the title, a materialist. After the wedding goes off successfully, Lucy meets the groom’s brother at the singles’ table. He is Harry (Pedro Pascal), deemed in the lexicon of the matchmaker world, a “unicorn,” because he “checks all the boxes,” handsome, tall, charming, interested in marriage, and very, very rich. He is instantly drawn to Lucy, even after she tells him that her only criterion for a husband is mind-blowing wealth, and that she will only date someone if she is certain it will lead to marriage.

Also at the wedding, though, is John, who is working as a cater-waiter. They have a cordial, even borderline affectionate, conversation and he drives her home in the same beater car he had when they were together.

So the central conflict here is not just between two men, but between two lives, two versions of herself. And around her are people making choices and experiencing the consequences that affect the way Lucy thinks about her own choices.

This is where the film runs into difficulties. We are told (not shown) about the characters’ feelings. Harry and Lucy have a series of dinner dates in beautiful, luxurious settings, but all they ever talk about is whether Lucy wants or should want to date him. There’s never even the most basic movie shorthand for falling in love, some kind of connection through their pasts or their interests. A crucial conversation and turning point in their relationship is too superficial, even for a seemingly superficial subject. While we get a flashback showing us how strains of not having enough money and the more significant strains of different ideas led Lucy and John to break up, there is nothing in their interactions to demonstrate a shared understanding.

More than once in the film, characters talk about feeling valued or worthless. What makes people feel valued by themselves or others, is tantalizingly raised, but frustratingly sketched.

The movie begins with a couple apparently from the bronze age as a (very fictionalized) symbol of the origins of romance. We see several of ADORE’s clients explaining their unrealistic and, in some cases, selfish expectations in a match. These scenes end up more distracting than pointed. A tragic match leads to the film’s strongest performance (Zoe Winters as Lucy’s client) but it is off-kilter with the rest of the story. Lucy actually does very little for her clients, Neve suggesting, for example, that they might want to focus less on how they want to be loved than on how they want to love.

The issues Song wants to address are deep; the way they are addressed is thin. But the actors are very charismatic and appealing and the settings are (mostly) enticingly luxurious.

Parents should know that this film includes drinking, smoking, and strong language. There are sexual references and non-explicit situations.

Family discussion: Was Lucy helping her clients? She says it is the only thing she is good at. How does she define “good?” Will that change? What similarities do you observe in the relationships between people who value each other?

If you like this, try: “How to Marry a Millionaire,” “Hitch,” and “Past Lives”

The Life of Chuck

Posted on June 15, 2025 at 12:24 pm

A-

Lowest Recommended Age:	High School
MPAA Rating:	Rated R for language
Profanity:	Strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness:	Apocalyptic themes, sad off-screen deaths including parents and grandparents, references to suicide
Diversity Issues:	Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters:	June 13, 2025

When a movie begins with “Act Three,” it is an invitation to open our minds to something unusual. “The Life of Chuck” is based on a story by Stephen King, and it reflects his more mystical side. While it includes dark and tragic themes, it is a story of profound humanity, ultimately spirit-expanding.

It begins at the end in more ways than one. A teacher named Marty (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is meeting with parents who seem oddly disconnected from concerns about how their children are doing in school. The world seems to be collapsing. A major earthquake has knocked California into the ocean. The internet is shutting down. Couples who have been together are splitting up and those that have split up are getting back together. Marty’s ex, Felicia (Karen Gillan) is an exhausted nurse in a hospital where most of the arrivals are attempted suicides. And somehow, signs – billboards, skywriting, bench posters, even projected in the windows of suburban homes — are appearing everywhere thanking someone named Chuck.

In Act Two we meet Chuck as a young boy and see him grow up. His parents were killed in an automobile accident, and he lives with his grandparents (Mark Hamill as Albie and “Ferris Bueller’s” Mia Sara as Sarah) in an old house with a padlocked room in a cupola on the top floor that he is warned never to open. He is very good at math but what he loves is dancing, and a dance class leads him to what will be one of his life’s most profound and satisfying moments, in part because after moments of doubt and fear of being judged (he is in middle school, the judgiest part of life), he finds the courage to follow his heart and take a risk. Later, as an adult, and, as we are told by narrator Nick Offerman, nine months from his death due to a still-undiagnosed brain tumor, he will have another sublime moment of dance, when he passes by a busking drummer on a break from an accounting conference.

To say much more would be to say too much; this is a film that benefits from an audience without expectations or advance guidance. But for those who have seen it and would like to know what I think it means, I have some spoiler-filled comments at the end of this review. For now, I will just point out that twice in the film teachers share a selection from Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself in their classrooms, the part that goes

Do I contradict myself?

Very well then I contradict myself,

(I am large, I contain multitudes.)

When Chuck’s teacher (played by Kate Sigel) explains this passage to him, she places her hands gently over his ears and asks what is between them. It is the multitudes within each of us, every emotion, every memory, every wish, every fear, every sublime moment, every crushing disappointment, every tiny quotidian interaction we are not even aware that we noticed.

This movie is a labor of love from both King and writer/director Mike Flanagan, whose wife (Seigel) and son (as the youngest version of Chuck) appear as key characters. It has a transcendent, poetic humanity that should make us better appreciate our own lives and the people we value. And take the time, at least once in a while, to dance.

Parents should know that a child’s father and pregnant mother are killed (offscreen) in a car accident and there are apocalyptic events. A central character dies and there are references to other deaths, including a suicide. Characters use strong language and there are references to pornography.

Family discussion: What multitudes are in you? Who would you want to be with if things were scary? What do we learn from Marty’s conversations with Sam and Gus? Should Chuck have listened to his grandfather’s advice?

If you like this try: “It’s a Wonderful Life,” “The Odd Life of Timothy Green,” and “Stranger Than Fiction”

Stop now if you don’t want spoilers.

CLUES: What does it mean that we see Sam and Gus in different time periods but they do not seem older or younger, while Chuck is played by four different actors as he goes from young childhood to middle age? Why is the Whitman poem so important?

MY VIEW: Every character in the movie is a part of the “multitudes” that make up one person, Chuck Krantz. The thank you signs are a part of his shutting down as he dies. When we die, our stories, our memories, our relationships, the multitudes within us stop, at least in the form of being contained in one individual consciousness. What Chuck saw in the locked room represents the recognition we all have that our lives are temporary.

Sorry, Baby

Posted on June 13, 2025 at 5:33 pm

A-

Lowest Recommended Age:	Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:	Rated R for sexual content and language
Profanity:	Very strong, explicit, and crude language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness:	Sexual abuse
Diversity Issues:	Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters:	June 13, 2025

Eva Victor makes an extraordinary debut as writer, director, and star of indie festival favorite “Sorry, Baby,” a story that includes profound trauma told with delicacy and even humor. Victor plays Agnes, a young college professor of literature when we first see her, a grad student in flashbacks that over the course of the film reveal an abusive encounter with her thesis advisor.

But the movie wisely begins with what will be the primary theme of the film, not the trauma but the grace that helps her go on.

Lydie (Naomi Ackie) arrives for a visit. She was Agnes’ housemate in college and they are still the closest of friends, the kind whose conversations skim along effortlessly and joyously, un-anchored by having to explain their references or hide their secrets. Their affection, devotion, and unconditional support are palpable.

Later in the film, a character played by the always-great John Carroll Lynch turns out to be an unexpected source of understanding and comfort when Agnes has a panic attack. It is a highlight of the film and one of the best moments we will see on screen this year.

The movie is told non-sequentially, with chapter headings, allowing us to get to know Agnes and get a hint of the reason for her vulnerability before we learn the details. Later we find out what happened and see the immediate aftermath, with responses adding insult to injury from a brusque doctor and from the school’s administrators. The structure is more mosaic than linear, with off-center revelations that allow us to think and feel through the aftermath.

We also get to know Agnes, who as written and portrayed by Victor is endearingly direct, even blunt at times, and yet keeping a lot inside. There comes a tipping point when we recognize the pain of dealing with the trauma is less than the pain of not dealing with it. And we see those moments reflected through Agnes’ interactions with her neighbor (the always-welcome Lucas Hedges), a stray cat, her students and supervisor, the Lynch character, and someone who appears for the first time in a stunning final scene.

Parents should know that this movie includes off-screen sexual abuse and the post-traumatic emotional struggles. There are explicit sexual references and characters use very strong language.

Family discussion: What do we learn from the scene with Agnes in the classroom? Why is Lolita the book discussed by the class? Why are there chapter titles?

If you like this, try: “Never Rarely Sometimes Always” and “The Spectacular Now”

From the World of John Wick: Ballerina

Posted on June 5, 2025 at 12:50 pm

B +

Lowest Recommended Age:	Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:	Rated R for strong/bloody violence throughout, and language
Profanity:	Very strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	None
Violence/ Scariness:	Extended very graphic peril and violence, including two fathers shot in front of their young daughters, many disturbing images, guns, knives, martial arts, grenades, flame throwers, car, much more
Diversity Issues:	None
Date Released to Theaters:	June 6, 2025

Yes, the stunts are always spectacular, but what makes the John Wick movies enthralling is the world, a parallel universe where rival international groups of assassins operate in ultra-elegant hotels and nightclubs without any interference from law enforcement or, well, reality. No matter. We’re not there to clock the believability. We’re there to enjoy the fantasy. Wouldn’t we all love to have a gold coin to check into one of the glamorous Continental hotels (it is bittersweet to see Lance Reddick in his last role), understanding that the unbreakable rule prohibiting killing anyone on the premises sometimes, like the bodies of the hotel guests, sometimes gets broken? Philip Ivey’s production design continues to entice and dazzle – more on that later.

For those paying close attention, this movie “from the world of John Wick” takes place not after the most recent film, Chapter 4, but between the third and fourth installments, making it a “midquel.” John Wick (Keanu Reeves), the greatest assassin of all, who left the profession to live a normal live but came back in when the puppy his late wife left him was killed by the spoiled son of a crime kingpin. Unforgettably, when he first heard who it was that his son had offended, the brutal crime kingpin paled. “John wasn’t exactly the Boogeyman. He was the one you sent to kill the f-ing Boogeyman.”

We will see Wick in this film. But the title character in this chapter is Ana de Armas as Eve. We first see her as a child (Victoria Comte), holding onto a music box with a mechanical ballerina dancing to Tchaikovsky’s “Swan Lake.” She is sitting on a bench in some kind of institutional hallway and both she and the music box are smeared with blood. A character we know well, Winston, the founder of the Continental Hotels (rumble-voiced Ian McShane), asks if he can be honest with her. He knows her father has just been murdered (though after killing a dozen or so of the thugs sent to kill him), and he offers to take her to a school where she can study dance. She puts her hand in his, and they go to meet The Director (the heads of assassination organizations are known only by their titles), played with implacable sang-froid by Anjelica Huston.

The Director runs a ballet company that trains, wait for it, ballerina assassins. “You will always be smaller. You will always be weaker,” the martial arts trainer tells now grown-up Eve. So, she has to learn to “fight like a girl,” to her opponent’s weight and strength against him.

There’s an important difference in Eve’s training, though. Her role will not be to kill people, though that will happen as she does her job, which is to protect those who are vulnerable to attack. Her first assignment (after her final test, with real bullets and real killing this time), is protecting the daughter of some powerful person with powerful enemies. The daughter, is, of course, dancing in a stunningly designed night club that appears to be made in part out of ice and snow. The dancing continues while Eve takes on the goons, wearing, of course, a spangly red gown.

Then we jump ahead a few months to the aftermath of another of her assignments, as she retrieves her knives from a lot of dead bodies and we have to imagine what the fight was like. Not for long, because she is in another one very quickly.

And soon she is tossing something onto The Director’s desk. “Is there a reason you brought me a severed

hand?” the Director asks cooly. There is a mark on the wrist Eve saw on the men who killed her father. So, now we are in revenge territory, with escalating stakes and even more escalating weapons and opponents. We will see some firepower, and I mean that literally.

There’s an intriguing shift from the ultra-urban sophistication of the settings to this point, the wonderful old-school phone and retro computer operators, who use vacuum tubes instead of email or texting to transmit documents, the sleek city skyline, the gracious, Victorian-influenced ballet offices. The last series of confrontations are in the kind of charming Bavarian-style village you might see in early Disney or Studio Ghibli, or perhaps in one of those carved wooden chalets with figures that swing in and out to tell you the barometric pressure.

This group is overseen by The Chancellor (a stoney Gabriel Byrne). And even by John Wick standards (and yes, he shows up), there are some wowza confrontations, fights, and stunts.

The movie does not pretend to be anything but 80 percent style and stunts, 20 percent meaning, but that 20 percent hits on issues of choice and purpose that are as much as we need to give us character and motivation. Given the preposterousness of notions like a training academy for ballerina assassins and dialogue like “The pain is what drives you,” it’s good to have some grounding.

Coming next: An animated prequel about the Winston and Charon characters

Parents should know that this movie, like the other John Wick movies, has non-stop peril and violence including martial arts, knives, guns, grenades, flame-throwers, a car crash, and more. There was some graphic and disturbing images including parents killed or attempted to be killed in front of young children. Characters use strong language.

Family discussion: Who has a choice in this movie and how did they decide? Why are the operators in the Continental so low-tech?

If you like this, try: the other John Wick movies