Air Force Elite: Thunderbirds

Air Force Elite: Thunderbirds

Posted on May 22, 2025 at 8:11 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Not rated
Profanity: None
Alcohol/ Drugs: Brief alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: Real-life danger and references to sad deaths
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: May 23, 2025

The Thunderbirds of the Air Force are the elite display team pilots who give demonstrations around the country to inspire Americans with a show of extraordinary courage and skill. This documentary, with producers that include Barack and Michelle Obama, is like Glenn Powell’s “The Blue Angels,” about the Navy’s elite flying group. It takes us inside the training that leads up to the annual tour of 62 shows across the country, with “flying acrobatics” and are “meant to look nearly impossible.” The signs on the doors they walk through to the airstrip say “Fly Like Champions” and “Blind Trust,” the first a goal, the second the foundational principle of the team, because they fly in such tight formation that the slightest error from one of them puts all of them at risk. As we see in the film, there have been a number of crashes and many Thunderbirds pilots have died.

Copyright 2025 Netflix

The pilots serve for two years, and each year half are new. So we begin with the arrival of three pilots joining the team. They are there because of their outstanding skills, but they have to unlearn as well as learn. The experience of the Tom Cruise in “Top Gun” types trained for combat or those “Right Stuff” types trained for testing new equipment are not exactly transferable and some are completely opposite. Combat pilots have two goals, to hit the target and stay alive. Thunderbirds literally are told to “divorce yourself from your usual survival instincts” because the maneuvers they perform are designed to keep them “micro-seconds from a life-threatening situation.” We see the impact of G-force acrobatics that make a 200-pound pilot into a 2000-pounder, making it impossible for oxygen to reach the head, so they pass out.

And we see that these pilots find all of that “frickin’ awesome.” One points to the number 5 painted on the side of the plane. It is upside down, because that way it will appear right-side up during the demonstration.

We spend much of the time with the boss, number one, called Astro (like the Blue Angels and the Top Guns, they have call signs — my favorite was the flight surgeon, who goes by Angry). His dream from his earliest childhood was to be an astronaut, and his parents proudly show us his grade school drawings. But when the Thunderbirds were in need, after a 2018 crash, they needed someone to make some changes, and his unique skills as a graduate of both combat and test flight training made him the ideal candidate. His wife says that she checked the mortality numbers for the Thunderbirds; ten percent. But the commitment to “service over self” meant they both understood that was where he needed to be.

We see one pilot struggle with his position and the way the others support him. And we see that the unquestioned dedication to “service over self” is as important to them as their constant training and striving for perfection.

We also see the support they get from the maintenance crews, every bit as devoted to excellence as the pilots. Their first demonstration at the Daytona races, is not perfect. They are supposed to appear on “brave,” the last word of the National Anthem. They’re off by seconds, but to them it feels like months. Astro’s reaction: “We have something to work on.”

The better we understand what goes into the maneuvers, the more we appreciate the skills that make it possible for them to fly in such tight formations, wings almost touching, each relying on the others to stay stable.

Copyright 2025 Netflix

The cinematography is stunning, with special thanks to Arial Coordinator (and stunt pilot) Kevin LaRossa II, also the genius behind the air footage of “Top Gun: Maverick,” “The Blue Angels,” “The Avengers,” any many more. The air maneuvers are dazzling. But it is the hearts, integrity, and courage of the Thunderbirds that are unforgettable.

Parents should know that this film includes references to airplane fatalities.

Family discussion: What made Astro decide to withdraw from the astronaut program? Do you agree with his decision? Go to one of the air shows and stay after to talk to the pilots.

If you like this, try: “The Blue Angels” and the “Top Gun” movies

Related Tags:

 

Documentary movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews
Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning

Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning

Posted on May 19, 2025 at 11:18 am

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of strong violence and action, bloody images, and brief language
Profanity: Brief strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: None
Violence/ Scariness: Extended peril and violence, guns, fire, fights, chases, explosions, stunts, some graphic and disturbing images
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: May 23, 2025

Yes, Tom Cruise runs. Very fast. Even at one point when he is in London and could probably get there faster in a cab, though for some reason there are no cars anywhere as he races across Westminster Bridge. He also does that mask thing where the disguise is so good that no one can tell it is him until he dramatically lifts the prosthetics from his head. And he attends a black tie gala. This is all in the first 15 minutes or so.

Copyright 2025 Paramount

Thus, we are able to get what we came for and get on with the new stuff, which also includes running and fight scenes, sometimes shirtless, blue wire/red wire bomb defusing decisions under extreme time pressure, Ethan Hunt telling everyone to just trust him, several people telling him that he is the only one who can save the world (“although you never followed orders, you never let us down”), recaps of the previous films with some reckoning and a bit of retconning, a very welcome return of a character from the first Cruise “Mission Impossible” in 1996, vastly over-qualified actors in near-cameos, and, of course, absolutely bananas but very exciting action scenes, one under water, one in the air. In other words, like Ethan Hunt himself, they understood the assignment.

You don’t need to remember much or even have seen part one because (a) they tell you what happened and (b) it doesn’t matter because all you need to know is that they need to get The Thing (and the things you need to disarm The Thing) or it will be very bad for the everyone on the planet.

The MacGuffin is an AI that is getting ready to destroy all of humanity, close to gaining control of every nuclear weapon in the world. This is of great concern to the US President (Angela Bassett) and to those who think they can take control of it and therefore of everything. The primary villain in this category is Gabriel (Esai Morales), but like The Ring in the LoTR films, the AI known as The Entity is so powerful that even honorable people can be seduced away from destroying it and into wanting it for themselves. It is a “truth-eating parasite processing our deepest personal secrets” that “knows precisely how to undermine our every strength and exploit our every weakness.” Time for only the purest of heart and the fastest of running men to save the day.

Like Harry Potter and the horcruxes or a character in a video game, stopping the Entity requires going to many places to obtain different items and perform various tasks. These mini-MacGuffins include the source code for the AI, which is in a sunken Russian submarine and the “pill” to shut it down, created by Ethan’s teammate Luther (Ving Rhames) and stolen by Gabriel, a variation on “Independence Day’s” virus uploaded to an alien operating system.

Thankfully, a lot of the communication between Ethan and his team is meaningful looks. The dialogue can get heavy-handed. There is not much of it, though, because everyone knows why we’re here, and it is not witty remarks. (One funny line relates to The Entity’s appeal to viral conspiracy types.)

There’s a big build-up to how dangerous and difficult the dive to the Russian submarine is and the high probability that it won’t work and Ethan will die, but hey, the name of the series isn’t “Mission Possible.” As with the last episode’s train scene, still to my mind the best action scene in the series, the submarine scene makes very good use of shifting weight and huge, heavy things that have to be ducked. After making it very clear that the only thing keeping Ethan alive at that depth and temperature is the super-high-tech diving suit, he has to shed it, so we see him swim around in his boxers.

The showstopper is an arial battle between two colorful biplanes, one red, one yellow. At this point, the film is cutting back and forth between four or five desperately high-pressure situations, but it is the planes that will forever show up in film school and highlight reels.

If you remember anything about the first film, it is most likely the hanging from the ceiling heist at the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. There was a humorous button on that scene of a confused CIA employee entering the room just as Ethan was exiting, leaving his knife behind. That employee was immediately transferred to the most remote location under the CIA’s jurisdiction as a consequence of the theft. He is computer genius William Donloe (Rolf Saxon), married to an Inuit woman named Tapessa (Lucy Tulugarjuk), and they are the two best new characters in this installment. “Severance’s” Tramell Tillman is a delight as a US submarine captain, but Hannah Waddingham, Janet McTeer, Carey Elwes, Nick Offerman, and Mark Gatiss are not given much to do (though Waddingham’s American accent is quite good, perhaps from listening to her co-stars in four years of “Ted Lasso”). Henry Czerny returns and is just right as the frustrated head of the CIA who thinks he knows better than Ethan. I think we know who’s right on that.

I usually say that in action films, everything depends on the villain. In “Mission Impossible” movies, everything depends on the stunts, the “Fast and Furious”-style found family of the team, and the unquenchable charisma of Tom Cruise. Fortunately, all are here. Happy summer and happy summer movies!

Parents should know that this film is non-stop action-style peril and violence with guns, chases, fights, and explosions. Characters are injured and killed. There is some strong language.

Family discussion: Movie villains often reflect contemporary controversies. What does this movie tell us about the possible outcome of our current decisions? Why did the President change her mind? What are Ethan’s regrets? People trust Ethan for different reasons. How many did we see?

If you like this, try: the other “Mission Impossible” movies

Related Tags:

 

Action/Adventure IMAX movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Series/Sequel Spies Thriller
Jane Austen Wrecked My Life

Jane Austen Wrecked My Life

Posted on May 8, 2025 at 5:33 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: Rated R for language, some sexual content, and nudity
Profanity: Strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol and smoking
Violence/ Scariness: References to sad deaths, car accident
Diversity Issues: None
Date Released to Theaters: May 9, 2025

I’m glad to say this is not yet another re-working of one of Jane Austen’s books, with a modern-day heroine being too quick to judge a moody but honorable Darcy and too slow to judge a superficially charming but immoral Wickham. Instead, it is not Elizabeth Bennett Agathe (Camille Rutherford) despairs of becoming; it is Austen herself.

Copyright 2025 Sony Pictures Classics

Agathe works at the legendary Shakespeare and Co, the English-language bookstore in Paris, but she dreams of being a writer. Okay, there is some initial hostility leading to attraction here, though none of Austen’s heroines accidentally walked stark naked into the bedroom of a man she’d just met. But as people in Paris might say, “Autres temps, autres mœurs.”

She has written some chapters — a romance, of course — but the trauma of losing her parents in a car accident and her own insecurity keep her from making any progress. She also cannot ride in a car, move out of her sister’s apartment, or begin a romantic relationship of her own. When her co-worker and best friend Felix (Pablo Pauly) submits an application in her name to a “Jane Austen” writer’s retreat, she begins to take the steps to move forward with her work and with her life. Rutherford makes Agathe very appealing and the screenplay by director Laura Piani, has warmth and charm. There is even a discussion about the value of stories that connected to Austen’s defense of the novel in Northanger Abbey.

The retreat is run by a warm-hearted but slightly eccentric couple, Beth (Liz Crowther) and Todd (Alan Fairbairn). We do not spend much time with the other writers at the retreat except to see that they are all writing while Agnethe is not.

Like Elizabeth in Pride and Prejudice, Marianne in Sense and Sensibility, Catherine in Northanger Abbey, and Anne in Persuasion, Emma in Emma, and Fanny in Mansfield Park, Agathe has to decide between two archetypical romantic possibilities. Will it be the friends-to-lovers Felix, who kisses her when he drops her off at the retreat? Agathe worries that he will “breadcrumb” her, alternating leading her on and ignoring her. Or will it be the enemies-to-lovers Oliver (Charlie Anson), the son of the couple who run the retreat who is a professor of contemporary literature and clashes with her immediately and then accidentally sees her naked?

Rutherford is an appealing heroine and the story is gently told, respectful of Agathe’s difficulty in recovering from trauma. While the romantic resolution is satisfying, it is not the solution, but rather a reflection of the courage and determination Agathe has relied on in addressing the issues that keeping her stuck. Miss Austen would approve.

Parents should know that this movie has nudity, non-explicit sexual situations, and sexual references. Characters drink, smoke, and use strong language.

Family discussion: Why did Agathe and her sister react so differently to the loss of their parents? Which man did you think Agathe would end up with and why?

If you like this, try: “Austenland” with Keri Russell, and of course Jane Austen’s books and the many movie adaptations

Related Tags:

 

movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance
Juliet & Romeo

Juliet & Romeo

Posted on May 8, 2025 at 5:23 pm

C
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for some violence, bloody images and suggestive material
Profanity: Mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol and drugs
Violence/ Scariness: Sword fight, attempted suicide
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: May 9, 2025

As he did with “Spinning Gold,” based on his father’s career in music, writer/director Timothy Scott Bogart has Temu-ed a great story and it is barely watchable. This time, it is Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet,” which he has renamed “Juliet & Romeo,” made some changes to the characters and storyline, reworked the dialogue so instead of exquisite poetry in iambic pentameter it’s more like college kids exchanging texts.

Copyright 2025 Briarcliff Entertainment

However, the fabulous production design by the brilliant Dante Ferretti and beautiful cinematography by Byron Werner are top-notch and the sword fights are ably staged. Oh, and this is a musical, with pop torch songs by Evan Kidd Bogart, who is a producer of the film, the composer of Beyonce’s hit, “Halo,” and Timothy Scott Bogart’s brother.

It isn’t as though we don’t already have a straightforward but artistic version in Franco Zeffirellis version with teenagers playing the young lovers and a sublime version with 20th century flair but Shakespeare’s language, in Baz Luhrman’s “Romeo + Juliet,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes.

This version begins a scene-setting intro that lets us know immediately what’s in store. Not just because we see the tragic couple dead before the story flashes back to three days earlier, but because Shakespeare’s

Two households, both alike in dignity
 (In fair Verona, where we lay our scene),
 From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
 Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.
 From forth the fatal loins of these two foes
 A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life;
 Whose misadventured piteous overthrows
 Doth with their death bury their parents’ strife.

becomes an “in the last episode”-style update somewhere between Shakespeare and the crawl at the beginning of “The Phantom Menace.”

We get a few Shakespearean crumbs just to remind us of what we’re missing. There are a couple of references to “what’s in a name,” and one to “all’s well that ends well.” But most of the dialogue is at the level of “I’m okay,” “You’re a great kisser,” and the repeated song lyric, “I knew that my heart would never be the same.” At one point Romeo sort of proposes by telling Juliet he wants to “turn our prose into poetry.” This screenplay has done the reverse.

Parents should know that this movie, like the play that inspired it, has fight scenes including sword fights, with characters injured and killed, and an apparent suicide. There are sexual references.

Family discussion: If you were going to update this story, what would you do? Why has this story continued to enthrall audiences for more than 500 years?

If you like this, try: “Rosaline,” a sharp, witty re-telling of the Romeo and Juliet story from the perspective of the young woman Romeo was in love with before he met Juliet, the Oscar-winning “Shakespeare in Love,” and the Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli versions of Shakespeare’s play and

Related Tags:

 

Based on a play Epic/Historical movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance
Swamp Dogg Gets His Pool Painted

Swamp Dogg Gets His Pool Painted

Posted on May 3, 2025 at 12:07 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Not rated
Profanity: Very strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol, drug references
Violence/ Scariness: Sad deaths
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: May 3, 2025

Swamp Dogg is not the typical musician and this is not the typical documentary about a musician. The movie, directed by three people:  Isaac Gale, Ryan Olson, and David McMurry, and written by four: Andrew Broder, Isaac Gale, Paul Lovelace, and Ryan Olson. The mosaic quality of film, messy, imaginative, zig-zaggy, fits the subject. The off-beat title — note the passive voice as well as the reference to an activity that we drop in on now and then as we meander through Swamp Dogg’s life and his past, which meanders now and then, too.

A pause for some non-meandering, linear background. Swamp Dogg is the stage name for a musician, songwriter, and producer named Jerry Williams. AllMusic writes: “Raunchy, satirical, political, and profane, Swamp Dogg is one of the great cult figures of American music.” His career spanned Southern soul, “eccentric” electronics, acoustic roots music, and rap (he was an early producer for Dr. Dre). His music was often provocative, with commentary on sensitive social and political issues. He now lives in the San Fernando Valley, sharing a house that has a pool with musicians Guitar Shorty and Moogstar and hanging out with performers and artists like Johnny Knoxville, SpongeBob’s Tom Kenny, and Mike Judge.

Copyright 2024 Magnolia Pictures

Swamp Dogg and his housemates and friends spent a lot of time sitting by the pool, casually chatting. These moments are surrounded by archival footage, including what looks like a bare-bones public access show hosted by a fan and some home movies made on one of the earliest videocameras. Those unfamiliar with Swamp Dogg will begin to understand his influence when we see him wander through a hallway in his home, passing a dozen or more gold records framed on the wall.

Those who then wonder why we are unfamiliar will get a sense of it when we see some of his work, like the album cover with him riding a giant rat. (One of the film’s highlights is when his friend, apparently not understanding how editing photography works or even that it exists, asks him where he found that giant rat.)

This movie is a pleasure on several levels, first as the discovery of a fascinating musician and his role in a remarkable variety of hit songs, second as a emblematically American version of a resolute original with a wildly generative and generous life, and third as a near idyllic story of a life of creation and support of others who want to create. It is also a story of loving family; Swamp Dogg’s neurologist daughter Jeri Williams’ love for her father is wonderfully touching.

And yes, that pool does get painted, and the final image is chef’s kiss.

Parents should know that this movie includes strong language and references to sex, drugs, and alcohol. There are references to sad deaths and family dysfunction.

Family discussion: Which of Swamp Dogg’s productions do you like the best and why? Would you like to live in a house of musicians?

If you like this, try: “Dolemite Is My Name” and “Muscle Shoals”

Related Tags:

 

Documentary movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2026, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik