Project Hail Mary

Project Hail Mary

Posted on March 18, 2026 at 10:12 am

A
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for some thematic material and suggestive references
Profanity: Mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: Intense sci-fi situations and peril, characters killed
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: March 20, 2026
Copyright 2026 Amazon MGM

“Project Hail Mary” is everything we hope for in a movie, filled with intelligence, humor, heart, and hope. It also has one of the rarest of qualities in a movie: genuine joy.

If we are going to spend much of the run-time with one actor, there couldn’t be a better choice than Ryan Gosling, who is a quintessential American boy-you-wish-lived-next-door hero, with self-deprecating humor, and the superpower of the scientist trifecta: boundless curiosity, problem-solving skill, and extensive knowledge of the physical properties and the organic world. Those three qualities overlap and enhance each other. If curiosity is your foundational mode of thought, there is no room for fear. And knowledge and not panicking help a lot with problem-solving.

Gosling plays an unassuming middle school science teacher named Ryland Grace. In a brief classroom scene we learn two things. First, he loves teaching and inspires his students. Second, as the students ask him questions about rumors and bits of news reports they’ve heard, there may be an existential threat in some changes to the sun. He does his best to answer honestly but reassuringly. And then, as he is about to ride home on his bicycle, he is quasi-Shanghaied by some mysterious but official-looking people. They are the ones monitoring the dimming of the sun and trying to figure out what is going on and how to stop it. The leader of this initiative is Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller), perhaps selected for this role because of her ability to move forward, eliminating every consideration except whatever it takes to keep the planet alive.

Hüller and Gosling play very well off of each other as the resolute Stratt and the amiably goofy Grace. The middle school math teacher has a degree in molecular biology and was tossed out of academia for a theory that was so far outside of conventional belief it was considered not scientifically valid.

It is his openness to think outside conventional belief that makes him immediately valuable to Stratt. And eventually we will learn how that led to his being sent on an interstellar mission to find out why just one star has not been affected or infected and what that means for saving our sun. A karaoke scene where Stratt sings Harry Styles’ “Sign of the Times” brings them together for a brief respite from the overwhelming existential threat; it is a pivot point at the heart of the story.

Information about the past is revealed to us as Grace remembers it in pieces. He has been in an induced coma as he traveled through space. The other members of the crew have died. But he is not alone for long. He meets an alien who is there for the same purpose. They find a way to communicate, and they work together to save the stars.

The alien, a sort of spider-looking creature who looks like he/she/it/they is/are made out of rocks and so nicknamed Rocky, is utterly endearing to Grace and to us. They manage to create a translation program so they can communicate but it helps a lot that for both of them their first language is science. Numbers and molecules and physics are the same in any language, even when the words for them are different. And, as Grace says, if his puny human brain does not understand what Rocky wants to say, Rocky uses his masterful construction skills to make little puppet figures to show Grace what he means.

They do have their adjustment problems. There is a scene that could be a sci-fi version of “The Odd Couple.” But the friendship that develops between them is immensely touching and the way they think through their challenges is hugely satisfying.

The production design by Charles Wood and special effects by a huge team are stunning. Directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller are the brains and heart behind some of the funniest, smartest and most joyfully buoyant animated films of the past two decades, including “Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs,” the “Spider-Verse” films, and “The LEGO Movie.” Their visual imaginations are witty, accessible, and thrilling. The score by Daniel Pemberton is excellent. And costume designers David Crossman and Glyn Dillon deserve a special award for Grace’s sweater, t-shirts, and glasses, which achieve the near-impossible in making Ryan Gosling look even more adorable and yet relatably human than we imagined.

Gosling contributes a lot to that as well, of course. He makes Grace just a little shrubby, but heroic in a way he does not realize. When he remembers something about his past near the end, when he is faced with a dire moral dilemma, when he finds a connection to Rocky that is more meaningful than any he has ever had before and realizes that connection is as important to saving both their planets as all the science and engineering they can draw on. Gosling does not just show us what Grace is feeling; he makes us feel it, too. His comic timing is impeccable, and he is just as good at the drama, the fear, and the adventure.

I do this job because in my heart I believe that movies are the culmination of every art form imagined by humans, the greatest story-telling mechanism ever developed. “Project Hail Mary” makes use of every part of that story-telling capacity, a film that makes us feel good about the characters, about the people who devoted all of their skill to making it, and about being human.

Parents should know that this movie is about a threat that could destroy all life on Earth. Characters are in peril and some are killed. There is some mild languages and references to bodies and characters drink alcohol.

Family discussion: If you woke up in a spaceship, what is the first thing you would do? If you met Rocky what questions would you ask?

If you like this, try; the book by Andy Weir and the book and movie of “The Martian

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Drama IMAX movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Science-Fiction
Reminders of Him

Reminders of Him

Posted on March 12, 2026 at 12:21 pm

B-
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 sexual content, strong language, drug content, some violent content, and brief partial nudity
Profanity: Some strong language including f-word
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol and drugs
Violence/ Scariness: Fatal car crash, brief scuffle with a couple of punches
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters: March 13, 2026
Copyright 2026 Universal Pictures

Before it was eclipsed by the superior guide to movies by Leonard Maltin, the late Steven H. Scheuer’s 1970s Movies on TV, dismissively referred to some romantic dramas as “for the ladies.” If he was still writing, the third firm based on a popular Colleen Hoover novel, this one co-written and co-produced by Hoover, would likely merit that description, along with “weepie” and possibly “syrupy.” It’s a story of redemption, reunion, healing, and romance, glossily filmed, with talented and attractive performers, which almost makes up for the fact that it may be watchable but it is not very good.

It stars Maika Monroe, more recently known for horror films like “Longlegs,” but worth checking out her earlier romantic drama, “After Everything,” opposite pre-“Bear” Jeremy Allen White. She plays Kenna, who returns to her home town after being released early for good behavior from a seven-year prison sentence. She asks the cab driver to stop at a. makeshift roadside memorial and takes the cross, telling us “Scotty hated memorials.”

She has returned home because she wants to see the daughter who was taken from her minutes after birth, now almost six years old and being raised by her grandparents, Grace (Lauren Graham) and Patrick (Bradley Whitford).

As Kenna starts from scratch, moving into a seedy apartment building. The landlord (“Schitt’s Creek’s Jocelyn, Jennifer Robertson), insists that Kenna take a kitten. No one wants to hire a felon. But a kind-hearted assistant manager at a grocery store played by country star Laney Wilson gives her a chance as a bagger.

Kenna stops by what used to be a bookstore/cafe that she loved. It is now a bar owned by Ledger (Tariq Withers). He is drawn to her but she is not ready to make a friend. And then it turns out there is a connection. Scotty, whose memorial Kenna destroyed, was Ledger’s lifelong best friend. He is a former NFL player, now living in his childhood home, across the street from Grace, Patrick, and the daughter Kenna is desperate to see, Diem (Zoe Kosovic). Ledger is devoted to Diem and she adores him.

When Ledger finds out that Kenna is the one who was convicted of vehicular manslaughter after the car accident that killed Scotty (played in flashbacks by Rudy Pankow, who even seen briefly is able to make us understand why everyone misses Scotty so much), he is furious, and he prevents her from seeing Diem. But he is still drawn to her. As he realizes how vulnerable and devastated she is, he offers her a part-time job at the bar. They begin to warm to each other.

It’s very soapy. As often happens with an adaptation of a book with an army of fans, there are details and characters that seem barely sketched in because a film script won’t have the time to develop them that an author has in a novel and a reader has the opportunity to fill in as she pictures the story in her mind. The situations and attempts at humor are contrived and the dialogue is clunky except when it is said by Diem or by Kenna’s neighbor and fellow bagger, a spunky young woman with Down syndrome named Lady Diana (the appealing Monika Myers), when it is just sugary. It ham-handedly signals Kenna’s increasing confidence by having her start combing her hair and go from tiny cut-offs to pants. The scene with Scotty and Ledger laughing when high as teenagers is not nearly as endearing as it tries to be. The story feels like Temu Nicholas Sparks. But Monroe and Withers give strong performances, doing much more than the script to make us feel the conflicts and chemistry of Kenna and Ledger. That plus the inherent belief in the themes of second chances make it watchable, if pleasantly forgettable.

Parents should know that this film includes mature material including a fatal car crash, a guilty plea to vehicular homicide while under the influence of drugs, custody issues, alcohol and drug use, sexual references and non-explicit situations, and some strong language.

Family discussion: Was Kenna’s sentence fair? What made Ledger change his mind about her?

If you like this, try: the book by Colleen Hoover as well as “The Lucky One,” “An Unfinished Life,” “Gifted,” and “What Maisie Knew”

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Drama movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Romance
“Wuthering Heights”

“Wuthering Heights”

Posted on February 11, 2026 at 2:40 pm

C
Lowest Recommended Age: Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating: ated R for sexual content, some violent content and language
Profanity: Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Drinking and drunkenness
Violence/ Scariness: Some peril and violence, a hanging, medical crisis, sad deaths
Diversity Issues: Class diversity
Date Released to Theaters: February 13, 2026

Emerald Fennell’s new film is more of a a sexy perfume commercial than a version of the classic Emily Bronte novel. The title and character names are from the book as are the windswept moors that act as setting and metaphor. But the book is not a romance; it is a story of obsession, repression, grief, and generational trauma. This version changes some of the relationships and, significantly, backstories to center the passionate love affair between Catherine Earnshaw (Margot Robbie) and Heathcliff (Jacob Elordi).

The movie begins with a crude joke. We hear what sounds like a sexual situation, with bedsprings squeaking and increasingly heavy breathing. And then we see that the source of the sounds is….the last strangled breaths of a man who is being hanged. The crowd is watching it as great entertainment. And a young girl (Charlotte Mellington as young Catherine) is mesmerized.

Catherine lives with her dissolute, brutish father (Martin Clunes) in an isolated, once-grand home. There are a few shabby servants and a between-classes woman named Nelly (Hong Chau), the out-of-wedlock daughter of a nobleman, who serves as Cathy’s caretaker. Mr. Earnshaw impulsively brings home a boy he rescued from being beaten. He has no name, so Catherine dubs him Heathcliff (Owen Cooper of “Adolescence” as young Heathcliff), after her late brother.

Catherine and Heathcliff have an instant, deep connection, but it is not entirely reciprocal. They are a lesser version of Buttercup and Wesley; she takes advantage of him and teases him, he is never anything but devoted and sincere, and they never have any kind of honest conversation about their feelings or prospects. She sulks and flounces. When she makes them late for dinner, he takes a beating from Mr. Earnshaw by lying that he was responsible.

Copyright Warner Brothers 2025

The tiny population of the home that gives the book and the movie its name is all the people in this isolated area of the moors until the wealthy Edgar Linton moves five miles away with his ward, Isabella. Fennell is always superb at giving us striking, spectacular images that tell us a great deal about the characters, and the Linton home is one of Production Designer Suzie Davies’ most stunning achievements. Catherine (now played by Robbie) looks almost feral as she goes through a garden wall to enter the Linton’s exquisitely civilized space.

Soon, Heathcliff leaves and Catherine is married to Edgar. She now has magnificent jewels and a series of fabulous gowns in gorgeous settings, a sharp contrast to the wildness of the moors. Just in case we don’t get the point, Isabella makes a doll version of herself and Catherine and puts them in a dollhouse version of the Linton mansion, which itself, like an infinite regression, has a miniature version so the dolls can play with their own dollhouse. Oh, and the Catherine doll has Catherine’s own hair, taken from her hairbrush.

Fennell has some wild details, including Edgar having Catherine’s bedroom painted the color of her complexion, down to her freckle, and Catherine peeking through the floorboards to watch her servants have sex in the stable, using the horse’s bridle as a sex toy. And, again, a departure from the book, when Heathcliff returns, years later, he and Catherine have an affair. Perhaps the most significant departure is eliminating several characters and the multi-generational elements of the story. Or maybe it is when characters in a sexual relationship of domination and humiliation, and the one who is dominated end up chained like a dog and forced to communicate by barking. There’s no reason to believe these people care about each other beyond the fact that there are literally no other people around.

Pretty people in beautiful settings yearning, hurting each other, having sex — eye candy, titillation, but very superficial. At least a perfume commercial is over quickly.

Parents should know that this movie has very explicit sexual situations and references including domination and bondage, an alcoholic and abusive parent, sad deaths, strong language, drinking and smoking.

Family discussion:

If you like this, try: the book and the other movie versions, especially the one starring Sir Laurence Olivier.

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Drama movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Remake Romance Tragedy
Wicked: For Good

Wicked: For Good

Posted on November 20, 2025 at 5:37 pm

B +
Lowest Recommended Age: Middle School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG action/violence, some suggestive material, and thematic material
Profanity: None
Alcohol/ Drugs: Brief alcohol
Violence/ Scariness: Fantasy peril and violence, character killed
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: November 21, 2025

I liked “Wicked: For Good” a lot. But before I tell you why, let me warn anyone out there who is hoping that part two of the movie based on the Broadway musical, based on the book, inspired by the classic L. Frank Baum story will be a lot like part one that the second half of the story is much darker and less hummable than the first. If you want to revisit the magical college for teenagers, gorgeous songs and dance numbers, and ode to opening your hearts to friendship with those who you might initially consider to be too different, then watch the first one again.

Copyright 2025 Universal

“Wicked: For Good” picks up 12 Ozian years later, long past the days of the dorms, classes, and parties at Shiz University. But Galinda, now known as Glinda (Ariana Grande), is finally something of a teacher’s pet, though in this case she is more of an operative for the powerful Madame Morrible (Michelle Yeoh), the top advisor for the Wizard (Jeff Goldblum). So, she’s less “pet” as in favorite as “pet” as in being a convenient (not asking questions) and attractive (yes, popular) spokesperson. As a student, Glinda was unable to get Madame Morrible to teach her. Indeed, she was blunt in telling her would-be apprentice that she had no talent for magic. As an adult, Madame Morrible found her to be an ideal focus of attention for the population, reassuring them that all was well.

Glinda loves being adored by the population and does not think too hard about the cruelty of the Wizard’s reign, even when her one-time friend Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) is now public enemy number one, with wanted posters all over Oz declaring her a threat. Fiero (Jonathan Bailey) is now an officer in the Wizard’s guard, feeling conflicted about Elphaba. But when Glinda announces to the crowd, that they are engaged, Madam Morrible’s idea as the latest entertaining distraction, Fiero goes along with it.

Nessarose (Narissa Bode) has now taken over the position of her late father and is governor of Munchkinland. She is still in love with Bob (Ethan Slater), not knowing that he only asked her to the school dance because Glinda told him to and he only stayed by her side after her father died because he still wanted to be a support for her. When he tells her he thinks it is time for him to leave, she impulsively imposes travel restrictions to keep him from going. Both Bok and Fiero do not want to let down the women who love them, though they long to be with someone else.

Glinda tries to get Elphaba to join the Wizard, and she almost agrees, after he promises to release the flying monkeys and allow the animals to return. When she learns he has not been honest, she resolves to become his enemy.

We know where this is going. While some of the details of the very familiar story are changed, including the origin stories of the Tin Woodman and Scarecrow, the little girl in the checked dress from Kansas and her dog arrive in a storm (the origin story of the storm is well handled) and most of the consequences for the characters remain the same. There are even touches from the MGM movie, for example, when Madame Morrible says a line Margaret Hamilton delivers so memorably about what “must be done delicately.”

Almost all of the now-iconic musical numbers are in the first movie. Despite the best efforts of two powerhouse singers, the songs from the play’s second act and a couple of new ones do not reach those soaring heights. Some reprises come as a relief. The new songs are less tied to defining character developments or crowds performing lively dances. The storyline nearly tips over into making unrequited love the motive for the main characters’ anger, hurt, and motivation for bad behavior, before remembering that the real heart of the story is about choosing trust, kindness, and inclusion over fear and grabs for power.

Production design by Nathan Crowley remains stunning, from the most intricate details to the grandest visions. The same goes for Paul Tazewell’s fabulous costumes. Erivo and Grande sing, never less than transcendently spectacular. Jonathan Bailey gives Fiyero a quiet smolder as he goes from dancing through life to thinking about choices to following his heart. It is subtle, not a term that comes to mind when considering the joyful maximalism of the “Wicked” film and therefore exceptionally moving. And, with credit to director John M. Chu and his outstanding cast, somewhere in all of the eye candy and bombast there are some meaningful comments on the path to power through spreading fear and making the population distrust one another. And there is a tender-hearted story of love and loss, of selfishness and the courage to oppose it, and of the people we love because they see our best selves even before we do.

Parents should know that this film has fantasy peril and violence, and a character is killed. There are brief references to paternity/adultery and a non-explicit sexual situation.

Family discussion: Pick a favorite story and see if you can imagine it from the point of view of one of the other characters. Why were Glinda and Elpheba friends? What did they learn from each other?

If you like this, try: “Wicked” and “The Wizard of Oz,” “The Wiz,” and the books by L. Frank Baum, and join the Oz Club!

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Based on a play Drama Fantasy movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews Musical
Nuremberg

Nuremberg

Posted on November 6, 2025 at 5:51 pm

A-
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for violent content related to the Holocaust, disturbing images, strong language, and themes including suicide, smoking, and brief drug use
Profanity: Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs: Alcohol, drugs, and smoking
Violence/ Scariness: Wartime and Holocaust references, archival scenes from concentration camps
Diversity Issues: A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters: November 7, 2025

Those who have studied 20th century history know that after WWII the Allies did something no governments had ever done after a surrender. They held a formal trial, not about Germany’s acts of war but about the “crimes against humanity” that tortured, imprisioned, stole from, and murdered its own people, and tried to eradicate citizens based on their religion, disability, and sexual orientation. They were known as the Nuremberg trials.

Copyright Sony Pictures Classics 2025

But even those who have studied that process may not know that the American military also assigned its own psychiatrists to interview the first 22 German officers and political leaders. It was not, as in an ordinary criminal trial, to determine their ability to understand the proceedings and in some cases their culpability for their decisions, but to try to understand what kinds of minds would create what we now call the Holocaust. Those questions have continued to confound us for 80 years, and continue to be explored by historians and filmmakers, including recent documentaries like “The Last Days,” “Shoah,” and “The Grey Zone” and narrative films like “The Zone of Interest” and “A Real Pain.”

“Nuremberg,” based in part on the book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack El-Hai, follows three intersecting stories, the efforts of Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson (Michael Shannon) to get the Allied countries together to agree on the trial, the charges, and its proceedings, the interviews military psychiatrist Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek) conducted with top Nazi official Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe), and Howie Triest (Leo Woodall) a young military officer assigned to Kelley as a translator.

Jackson’s plan seems impossible, “a logistical nightmare.” “What you’re talking about is trying them in some sort of legal limbo that doesn’t exist using laws that haven’t been written yet,” he is told, and reminded that Germany never attacked the US. He would have to get the involvement of all of the Allies to participate, including the USSR. He insists, “The world needs to know what these men did.”

There is an optimism behind it, an idea that if the top Nazis were both convicted and diagnosed, it would help make sure that nothing like the Holocaust would ever happen again.

The essence of the film is in the interviews/conversations between Kelley and Göring, and the two Oscar-winners and writer/director James Vanderbilt’s script make them among the most riveting screen moments of the year.

Vanderbilt is superb in revealing the complexity of the moral and legal issues. Kelley is trained to give therapy, with patient confidentiality. Jackson wants him to use his sessions to find Göring’s vulnerabilities, to help with the prosecution. General Eisenhower insists that there be no executions without a trial, giving the men the opportunity to defend themselves. The risk of failing to find them guilty is the risk of making them martyrs, allowing atrocities to happen again. Jackson and the military are also very aware that the humiliation Germany suffered at the end of WWI played a big part in Hitler’s rise. Göring tells Kelley why he followed Hitler: “Along came a man who said we could reclaim our former glory. Would you not follow such a man?”

Jackson reminds us that the war “started with laws,” and should end with them. They have to create a sense of fairness and justice without repeating the mistakes of the post WWI Paris Peace Conference that divided up German’s territories.

The movie is well paced, as a thriller, a courtroom drama, and an exploration of history and the human capacity for evil and for good. It is never didactic or heavy-handed. There are moments of humor and excellent performances by all.

Vanderbilt has a gift for telling details like Göring ripping the lace-edged hem of his wife’s slip to make a white flag of surrender as his car reaches the Americans, and then casually telling them to get his luggage, as though the American soldiers are baggage handlers.

When the military thinks Kelley is too sympathetic, they bring in another psychiatrist (Colin Hanks), who is clear that he is there to write a book about it. Kelley is disturbed by this unabashed acknowledgement of self-interest. The film lets us know that Kelley did himself write a book, though, 22 Cells in Nuremberg: A Psychiatrist Examines the Nazi Criminals. It is hard to find but well worth reading, especially its conclusion, calling for the same commitments we are still trying to achieve today. It is impossible to watch this film without being chilled by what happened in Germany. It is impossible not to think about the lessons we have failed to learn.

Parents should know that this film includes references to wartime violence and the Holocaust, with real archival footage of concentration camps. There is some strong language and characters drink, smoke, and use drugs.

Family discussion: Compare the Nuremberg trials to a later version, South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Which is better? When the current global conflicts are resolved, how should we treat those involved?

If you like this, try: “Judgment at Nuremberg.” a 1961 film about the later trials, with waning interest in pursuing the Nazi judges, exploring the issues of responsibility for those in lower-level roles. and the American Experience documentary, “The Nuremberg Trials

Related Tags:

 

Based on a book Based on a true story Drama Epic/Historical movie review Movies -- format Movies -- Reviews War
THE MOVIE MOM® is a registered trademark of Nell Minow. Use of the mark without express consent from Nell Minow constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws. All material © Nell Minow 1995-2026, all rights reserved, and no use or republication is permitted without explicit permission. This site hosts Nell Minow’s Movie Mom® archive, with material that originally appeared on Yahoo! Movies, Beliefnet, and other sources. Much of her new material can be found at Rogerebert.com, Huffington Post, and WheretoWatch. Her books include The Movie Mom’s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments, and she can be heard each week on radio stations across the country.

Website Designed by Max LaZebnik