Eleanor the Great

Posted on September 25, 2025 at 5:24 pm

B +

Lowest Recommended Age:	High School
MPAA Rating:	Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, some language and suggestive references
Profanity:	Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	None
Violence/ Scariness:	References to the Holocaust, sad death
Diversity Issues:	A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters:	September 26, 2025

Scarlett Johansson’s first film as a director shows the careful attention she has been paying as a performer, starting with the importance of casting. The irreplaceable June Squibb stars as the title character, an outspoken 94-year old who moves from her home in Florida to New York after the death of Bessie (Rita Zohar), her roommate and best friend.

The opening scenes show the ease, comfort, and support of that friendship, as they strap on their velcro-strap shoes, grab Eleanor’s cane, go for a walk and shop for groceries. Bessie collapses in the store, and we see them in the hospital, Eleanor making sure Bessie sees a doctor right away by telling the nurse Bessie is a member of the family who donated the money for a wing at the hospital, despite the fact that it is not true. She also lies to a nosy neighbor, just to annoy her. This comfort with deception appears at first to be harmless but it is an indication of the dangers ahead.

In New York, Eleanor reunites with her recently divorced daughter, Lisa (Jessica Hecht), and college student grandson, Max (Will Price). In contrast to her relationship with Bessie, her connection to her family is prickly, contrary, and sometimes judgmental. Lisa has signed Eleanor up for a singing group at the Jewish Community Center and encourages her to look at assisted living options. Eleanor is not interested. At the JCC, she wanders into a meeting, not realizing it is a support group for Holocaust survivors. When called upon to introduce herself, she uses one of Bessie’s stories. Sitting in on the meeting is a journalism student named Nina (a radiant Erin Kellyman), who is captivated by Eleanor’s story and wants to write about her.

Nina’s mother died six months earlier and her father, a television news reporter (Chiwetel Ejiofor as Roger) has been distant, dealing with his own grief. The dislocation and grief they share leads Nina and Eleanor to become close friends very quickly.

The chemistry between them is palpable, so we want that friendship to continue to be a source of connection and healing for them. But we know, as Eleanor realizes at some level, that the “stolen valor” lie at its foundation must detonate, causing great pain for both of them. What is unexpected is compassion and generosity of the way it is resolved, I suspect the reason Johansson and Squibb were drawn to the story.

Squibb is, as we saw in “Nebraska” and “Thelma,” a treasure and this role gives her a chance to play a character who is fully human, flawed, grieving, and still learning. The British Kellyman has an impeccable American accent and she is a gem, lighting up the screen with her vulnerability and the way she treasures and is reassured by her friendship with Eleanor. Johansson created a space for superb performances by everyone in the cast, including Jessica Hecht as Eleanor’s frustrated daughter and Zohar as Eleanor’s roommate and lifelong friend.

Sqiibb, Kellyman, Johansson, and first-time screenwriter Tory Kamen have made a film about loss, friendship, and compassion. Eleanor may not always be great, but this movie lets us see the parts of her that really are.

Parents should know that this movie includes some strong language, references to the Holocaust, and grief over the deaths of a wife and mother and a friend.

Family discussion: Why did Eleanor lie? Why was it hard for her to be as nice to her daughter as she was to Nina and Bessie? Were you surprised by Lisa’s response?

If you like this, try: “Thelma,” also starring June Squibb

Jurassic World: Rebirth

Posted on July 1, 2025 at 5:43 pm

Lowest Recommended Age:	Middle School
MPAA Rating:	Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references, language and a drug reference
Profanity:	Some mild language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Brief reference to marijuana
Violence/ Scariness:	Extended peril and violence with many jump scares and graphic and disturbing images, many characters killed including several eaten by dinosaurs
Diversity Issues:	Diverse characters
Date Released to Theaters:	July 3, 2025
Date Released to DVD:	August 13, 2025

There’s a cheeky moment at the beginning of “Jurassic World: Rebirth,” the latest in the series about dinosaurs brought back to life, originally based on the book by Michael Crichton. (I think it is very funny that the screenwriting credits say “based on characters created by Michael Crichton,” when the only “characters” in the movie based on his book are the dinosaurs.) We think we know where it’s going when we hear a roar and see the tops of the high trees rustling, then shaking.

We sit back, expecting a dinosaur. But no, it’s just a helicopter. And then there’s another wink at the audience, a close-up harking back to the first film, one of the greatest shots in film history. But this time, it’s not a dinosaur in the rearview mirror. It’s just a traffic jam. Caused by a dinosaur. But at this point, the stuck driver we zero in on not wonderstruck or terrified. He’s just annoyed, as he might be if he was just being blocked by construction.

All these years after the dino DNA was extracted from the amber, humans have acclimated to, even bored with the idea that prehistoric creatures are a part of 21st century life.

Most of them have died off. The scary ones are pretty much located in the equator, closest to their habitat 66 million years ago, before they went extinct. That area is now off limits to all humans.

But one thing we’ve learned from the previous films and from ancient Greek tragedies about hubris and from pretty much all of human history is that the greatest adaptive and the greatest self-destructive quality of human beings is that we just don’t like being told what we can’t do. And so, screenwriter David Koepp, who has been writing these films since the first one, faces his greatest challenge in trying to give the human characters a new reason to put themselves in danger by going back to the dinosaurs again, what Alfred Hitchcock called the MacGuffin (or Maguffin), the simplest possible explanation of what it is the heroes need to get or accomplish.

In this case, it’s….dino DNA. Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend), the representative of a pharma company, approaches adventurer/soldier of fortune Zora (always-game Scarlett Johansson), whose specialty is getting people and objects into and out of places they are not supposed to be. For money. He tells her his company can make a revolutionary new medication that can forestall heart disease, adding as much as 20 years to people’s lives, if they can get samples of DNA from three of the largest dinosaurs, found only in the forbidden equator territory. It has to be taken from no more than 10 meters from the three biggest and they have to be alive because blah blah biology blah blah we need a reason for our characters to get into risk getting eaten situations. See: MacGuffin

Martin brings along a paleontologist, Dr. Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey, as magnetic and charming as he was in “Wicked,” even with an American accent).

Zora brings Martin to her long-time friend and colleague, the dashing Duncan (Mahershala Ali). He is the boat captain who will transport them, with his crew. Meanwhile, Reuben (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) is out on his sailboat with two daughters and one’s boyfriend. Once we have had a chance to get to know them (cute little girl played by Audrina Miranda, useless teenage boyfriend played by David Iacono, for quasi comic relief and something of a redemption arc). The sailboat is toppled by a gigantic swimming dinosaur. Will our group in search of dino DNA take a detour to rescue them? Yes.

And then, what we came for: dinosaurs chasing (and eating) people. And, just to mix it up a bit, some people chasing dinosaurs. A sprinkle of humor (useless boyfriend), a touch of warmth (useless boyfriend becomes useful), a very brief detour into morality and some might say politics only because everything seems to be political these days, but mostly the aforementioned chasing. The actors do as well as possible to hold their own on screen opposite leviathans, benefitted by Ali’s rakish charm and core of integrity, Johansson’s toughness-with-a-heart portrayal of Zora as someone who has seen the worst of humanity and perhaps done some, too, but never became cynical, and Garcia-Rulfo as a wholeheartedly devoted to his daughters.

The dinosaurs are (still) hugely (in all senses of the word) impressive. The way they move, the weight that digital effects often fails to get right, the scale/size, all spectacular. The movie seems to lose track of the set-up at the beginning about a lab experimenting with cross-breeding and mutating dinosaurs, but so much is happening it is understandable. Perhaps they’re saving that for the next one. We’ll be there.

Parents should know that this is a very intense and scary movie with constant peril and some graphic and disturbing images. Characters, including a little girl, are in danger and many characters are eaten by dinosaurs. There are brief sexual references and a reference to weed.

Family discussion: If you knew you could cure a disease by taking a risk like this, would you do it? Do you agree with the decision made by Henry and Zora? What are the upsides and downsides?

If you like this, try: the previous “Jurassic” movies and Crichton’s book

The Phoenician Scheme

Posted on May 29, 2025 at 5:30 pm

Lowest Recommended Age:	High School
MPAA Rating:	PG-13 for violent content, bloody images, some sexual material, nude images, and smoking throughout
Profanity:	Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Drinking and smoking
Violence/ Scariness:	Graphic violence with disturbing images, characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues:	None
Date Released to Theaters:	May 30, 2025

You say you want to see a very smart, darkly comic film about the daughter of an unscrupulous businessman who before the story begins has joined a religious order but over the course of the story learns that she can do more to help people in his secular world and becomes drawn to a young professor? Then I suggest you watch the brilliant film “Major Barbara,” starring Wendy Hiller and a young Rex Harrison and with a very young Deborah Kerr, based on the classic play by George Bernard Shaw.

Or, if you would like to see a movie that skitters along the surface of some of those themes without having much to say about them but looks gorgeous, in fact so exquisite that if it starts to drag, which it does, we wish the actors would get out of the way so we could better absorb the beauty of the settings. In other words, we’re in the bento box movie world of Wes Anderson.

What bothers me third-most about Wes Anderson films is the way the characters speak the mildly arcane dialogue in constant near-robotic deadpan. What bothers me second-most is that the dialogue delivered in monotone is not just mildly arcane but pretentiously so, as though the twee-ness indicates both comic sensibility and deeper meaning. There can be humor in saying extreme things with a flat delivery, as though you’re politely asking to pass the butter, can be funny, but not always and not for a whole movie. What bothers me most is the way many people emperor’s-new-clothes the films, believing that the humor and deeper meaning they discern is somehow invisible to the less sophisticated instead of non-existent.

Benicio Del Toro plays Zsa-zsa Korda, a wealthy, powerful, and corrupt businessman, who says his two imperatives are “Who could lick who (or whom)?” (measuring success by beating the competition) and “If something gets in your way, flatten it” (the ends justify even scorched-earth means).

There are those who have similar guiding principles, or lack of principles, and therefore, as we see in the first scene, when an explosion on Korda’s airplane blows a big hole in the hull, and also in one of his aides, slicing his top half from his bottom half. Korda then goes into the cockpit and fires his pilot, in both senses of the word, dismissing him from employment and jettisoning him via ejector seat. Korda survives the crash landing with injuries. He knows more murder attempts are coming, and so he reaches out to his daughter Liesel (Mia Threapleton, daughter of Kate Winslet). She is about to take orders as a nun, and throughout the film she wears a snowy white habit, though as it goes on she also sports colorful eye shadow and bright red nail polish. Korda also has nine young sons, some adopted. His only interest in them is the thought that there are so many of them, odds are one will be brilliant.

Anderson’s two most recent films were episodic, like nested dolls. This one is slightly more linear, but still in chapters as Korda visits a series of characters in very different settings played by stars like Tom Hanks and Bryan Cranston (as American brothers in college sweatshirts), Scarlett Johansson as Korda’s second cousin and possible future wife, Jeffrey Wright as a ship captain, and Benedict Cumberbatch as Korda’s rival and half-brother. There are various murder attempts (the characters refer to them as assassination attempts, but that seems grandiose for a businessman, even one who is rich and powerful and has done evil things, because the term refers to the killing of an important person for political or religious reasons). And Korda and Liesel are accompanied by a character played by Michael Cera, introduced as a tutor brought on to teach them about insects (do not try to make this tie into anything except the overall anemic randomness that translates to “and then this character appears.” He plays a more important role as the story goes on and is the closest the movie comes to having a bright spot. It’s not that it has style and no substance. It has style and anti-substance.

Other than the settings, of course, which are fabulously imagined and entrancingly detailed. (As always with Anderson, look at the titles and covers of the books the characters read.) The movie might work better with no dialogue, just the visuals and the music.

Parents should know that this movie has a lot of peril and violence with some graphic and disturbing images. The movie includes guns, knives, bombs, fire, plane crashes, and quicksand. Characters are injured and killed, including references to a murdered parent. Characters are corrupt and murderous. they behave badly in business and with family, and they drink and smoke. Characters’ religious beliefs are not meaningful or sincere.

Family discussion: Why does Liesel stay with her father? What does she hope to achieve and how does that change? What do we learn from the names of Korda’s projects? From his mottos?

If you like this, try other Wes Anderson Films, especially “The Fantastic Mr. Fox.”

Transformers One

Posted on September 19, 2024 at 4:36 pm

B +

Lowest Recommended Age:	4th - 6th Grade
MPAA Rating:	Rated PG for sci-fi violence and animated action throughout, and language
Profanity:	Mild schoolyard language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	None
Violence/ Scariness:	Extended action/cartoon-style violence, characters injured and destroyed
Diversity Issues:	A theme of the movie
Date Released to Theaters:	September 20, 2024

“Transformers One” has just about transformed me into a fan. I know — based on a toy and a Saturday morning cartoon series and lots of movies already so it was hard to imagine that they could surprise me, but they did, with well-designed action scenes, an origin story drawing from classic sources, and A-list actors bringing their A-game as voice talent.

Quick recap: Transformers turn from robot-y creatures into car creatures. The good ones are the Autobots, led by Optimus Prime and they befriend humans. The goofy one is Bumblebee. The bad guys are Decepticons, led by Megatron. The bots we meet here will become these characters.

It takes place long before the Autobots come to earth. They are on their home planet, called Cybertron, where an arrogant ruler cruelly oppresses the worker bots. Cybertron is in dire distress following a brutal war with the Quintessons.

There is a sharp class distinction between the overlords, who have cogs in their chests that give them the power to transform, and the cog-less workers, who spend their days doing drudge work in the mines, looking for Energon, the once-plentiful substance that sustains them.

They are literally kept in the dark, spending their days in the mine and being lied to about who they are, the history of Cybertron, and what is really happening.

Orion Pax (Chris Hemsworth) and D-16 (Brian Tyree Henry) are best friends. Their support for one another is what keeps them going. They do not realize that the restrictions that constrain them keep them from noticing how different they are. Orion is more optimistic, willing to take some risks. D-16 does not want to get in trouble. “No bad things happen when you stay on protocol,” he says, as Orion is beginning to understand that protocol itself is the bad thing.

Orion enters himself and D-16 into a race reserved for bots with cogs. This challenging of the hierarchy brings the unwanted attention of the cog bots, who punish Orion and D-16 by reassigning them. That is where they meet a straight-laced supervisor named Elita-1 (Scarlett Johansson) and the goofy, motormouthed B-127 (a very funny Keegan-Michael Key, sneaking in a reference to his “Substitute Teacher” sketch).

The four bots end up on the planet’s surface, where they discover they have been lied to about pretty much everything. They were not created without cogs; their cogs were taken from them. Now be-cogged and able to transform, they discover their new powers as they learn about the lies they have been told by the forces holding their community down.

The closer they get to escaping oppression, the more the two friends find they see everything differently. Orion sees hope and opportunity. D-16 sees threats that can only be removed through power. This almost Shakespearean divide (Othello and Iago, Professor X and Magneto) adds weight and meaning and a deeper sense of transformation to the various actions scenes,.

What makes that work is the superb voice talent. Hemsworth shows us Orion’s shift from generalized naive good will to a more mature understanding of his opportunity as a leader, even as he sees the sacrifices it may require. And Brian Tyree Henry matches him, going from hesitation to hurt to anger. We are genuinely sad to see the end of their friendship even as we recognize its inevitability.

Parents should know that this PG-rated film has extended action sequences, mostly with machines battling each other. Some are injured and broken/killed and an animal is blown up. There is some mild schoolyard language, with “screwed” perhaps the strongest used.

Family discussion: Why do Orion and D-16 see the world differently? How does hope affect Orion’s thinking? How does fear and anger affect D-16’s?

If you like this, try: the original cartoons and the Michael Bay live-action films

Fly Me to the Moon

Posted on July 11, 2024 at 12:12 pm

A-

Lowest Recommended Age:	Middle School
MPAA Rating:	Rated PG-13 for some strong language and smoking
Profanity:	Some strong language
Alcohol/ Drugs:	Alcohol and smoking
Diversity Issues:	Issues of perception, expectations, and treatment of women
Date Released to Theaters:	July 12, 2024

Unless you care more about historical accuracy than a rollicking good story, I think you will really enjoy this movie, one of the most purely entertaining films of the year. And some of it is even true.

There are many places to get the real story of the moon landing. This has some of the story right, and some enhanced for dramatic, comedic, and romantic purposes, all of which are very well served.

Scarlett Johansson, who also produced, plays Kelly, an advertising executive who has the right combination for success in that field: she always understands her market/target/audience and she will say or do whatever it takes on its behalf. She can spin anything and that includes selling her own services.

She is approached by a mysterious man who says his name is Moe Berkus ( Woody Harrelson) and that he works for President Richard Nixon. John F. Kennedy promised an American man on the moon by the end of the decade and the end of the 60s is approaching. For the politicians, this is an essential achievement for the Cold War battle for supremacy of capitalism and democracy. If that sounds more like branding than public policy, you understand why, in the midst of some of the most divisive and troubled years of the 20th century, someone might decide that what NASA needed was an expert in marketing. After all, selling a product, whether breakfast cereal, car, or the space program, is about making the product real, immediate, personal, and aspirational. Kelly and her assistant arrive in Cocoa Beach, ready to sell the moon.

You could say the people in NASA were not happy about this, but perhaps a better term would be horrified. Their culture is about secrecy (national security), science, and control. The person in charge is Cole Davis (Channing Tatum) and he does his best to discourage Kelly. In other words, the ideal set-up for romantic sparks, and when it’s Tatum and Johansson, it’s more like fireworks. They are wonderful together.

The sharp, witty, and wise screenplay is by third-generation Hollywood writer Rose Gilroy (her grandfather was “The Subject Was Roses” screenwriter Frank Gilroy and her parents are Dan Gilroy of “Real Steel,” “Kong: Skull Island,” and “Nightcrawler” and Rene Russo). It skillfully balances the romantic comedy with the dramatic themes and the inherent tension in the goal everyone is working toward. Even if we know that indeed Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin will indeed walk on the moon the question of public support, we get caught up in the surprising challenges along the way. Who could guess that having astronauts sell watches, cars, and underwear — and, of course, Tang — would make them so relatable Americans would start to root for them? What will they have do and which Senators will they have to persuade to get the funding they need? Is there a way to sell space not as a distraction but as an unassailable story of American heroes and know-how?

Cole and Kelly have real differences that give this film a welcome depth. Both on the personal and professional level, the issue of what the truth is and how and when to tell it is presented thoughtfully and with the complexity it deserves, but it is never pedantic or preachy. Jim Rash plays a temperamental commercial director Moe insists join the team to make a back-up for the broadcast. The stunning technological innovations from a group of engineers with an average age of 26, working to solve the biggest jigsaw puzzle in the history of the world, in a building tall enough to enclose four Statues of Liberty on each other’s shoulders.

And there is a wonderful black cat. Plus Johansson’s husband, Colin Jost, in a brief, funny cameo. This movie is romantic, funny, exciting, and meaningful, filled with joy, honoring the heroes of the voyage to the moon for their dedication, innovation, and courage. And it has heartwarming compassion for the vulnerability of its characters that resonates with us long after the movie is over.

Parents should know that this film has some strong language, references to criminal behavior and a shooting in self-defense. For historical accuracy, there is a lot of smoking and a character talks about the impact on his health.

Family discussion: Who changes more, Cole or Kelly? Who is currently in the International Space Station today? Would you like to go to the moon? Visit the Smithsonian’s Air and Space Museum, where you can touch a real moon rock and see the NASA capsules.

If you like this, try: Other films about the Apollo 11 program, including “The Dish,” “Hidden Figures,” “First Man,” Tom Hanks’ excellent miniseries, “From the Earth to the Moon,” and the documentaries “Earthrise” and “Apollo 11”